Comparative study of analgesic effect of intrathecal nalbuphine and tramadol in patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy

Aparna Jayara, G. Bhandari, K. Shahi
{"title":"Comparative study of analgesic effect of intrathecal nalbuphine and tramadol in patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy","authors":"Aparna Jayara, G. Bhandari, K. Shahi","doi":"10.7439/IJBAR.V9I4.4697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To compare the analgesic effect and block characteristics of intrathecal nalbuphine and tramadol in patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy. Settings and design: Prospective, double-blind, randomized study on 80 patients of age 20-60 years, undergoing vaginal hysterectomy under spinal anaesthesia. Methods and Material: Random allocation in two groups, where group T and group N received 25 mg tramdol and 1 mg nalbuphine respectively along with 15 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacine through intrathecal route. Drugs were administered at the L3-4 interspace with the patient in the sitting position. Spinal block was assessed by pin prick and modified bromage scale. In postoperative period time of first request of analgesia, number of rescue analgesia, the duration of motor block from the time of drug administration to the time when patient was able to lift his leg and the adverse effects were recorded. Quantitative variables were compared using Unpaired t-test/Mann-Whitney Test. Qualitative variables were correlated using Chi-Square test /Fisher’s exact test. A p value of 0.05). Conclusion: In terms of sensory and motor block characteristics, nalbuphine provides faster onset, faster peak of analgesia than tramadol. In terms of postoperative analgesia nalbuphine and tramadol were statistically similar. Key message: This study establishes the efficacy of Nalbuphine (1mg) as an intrathecal adjuvant to 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for enhancing the intraoperative sensory block and better haemodynamic stability than Tramadol (25 mg) as an intrathecal adjuvant. In terms of postoperative analgesia and motor block characteristics both the drugs are comparable.","PeriodicalId":13848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"136-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBAR.V9I4.4697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To compare the analgesic effect and block characteristics of intrathecal nalbuphine and tramadol in patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy. Settings and design: Prospective, double-blind, randomized study on 80 patients of age 20-60 years, undergoing vaginal hysterectomy under spinal anaesthesia. Methods and Material: Random allocation in two groups, where group T and group N received 25 mg tramdol and 1 mg nalbuphine respectively along with 15 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacine through intrathecal route. Drugs were administered at the L3-4 interspace with the patient in the sitting position. Spinal block was assessed by pin prick and modified bromage scale. In postoperative period time of first request of analgesia, number of rescue analgesia, the duration of motor block from the time of drug administration to the time when patient was able to lift his leg and the adverse effects were recorded. Quantitative variables were compared using Unpaired t-test/Mann-Whitney Test. Qualitative variables were correlated using Chi-Square test /Fisher’s exact test. A p value of 0.05). Conclusion: In terms of sensory and motor block characteristics, nalbuphine provides faster onset, faster peak of analgesia than tramadol. In terms of postoperative analgesia nalbuphine and tramadol were statistically similar. Key message: This study establishes the efficacy of Nalbuphine (1mg) as an intrathecal adjuvant to 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for enhancing the intraoperative sensory block and better haemodynamic stability than Tramadol (25 mg) as an intrathecal adjuvant. In terms of postoperative analgesia and motor block characteristics both the drugs are comparable.
阴道子宫切除术患者鞘内注射纳布啡与曲马多镇痛效果的比较研究
目的:比较纳布啡和曲马多鞘内麻醉在阴道子宫切除术中的镇痛效果和阻滞特点。背景和设计:前瞻性、双盲、随机研究,80例年龄20-60岁,在脊髓麻醉下行阴道子宫切除术的患者。方法与材料:随机分为两组,T组和N组分别给予曲多25 mg、纳布啡1 mg及0.5%高压布比卡因15 mg经鞘内注射。在L3-4间隙给药,患者为坐位。脊髓阻滞采用针刺法和改良bromage评分法。记录术后首次请求镇痛时间、抢救镇痛次数、给药时间至患者能抬腿时间运动阻滞持续时间及不良反应。定量变量比较采用Unpaired t检验/Mann-Whitney检验。使用卡方检验/Fisher精确检验对定性变量进行相关性分析。p值为0.05)。结论:就感觉和运动阻滞特征而言,纳布啡比曲马多起效更快,镇痛峰更快。在术后镇痛方面,纳布啡和曲马多具有统计学上的相似。关键信息:本研究确定了纳布啡(1mg)作为鞘内佐剂与15mg 0.5%高压布比卡因相比,可以增强术中感觉阻滞,并且比曲马多(25mg)作为鞘内佐剂具有更好的血流动力学稳定性。在术后镇痛和运动阻滞方面,两种药物具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信