THE EFFECT OF PLATELET RICH FIBRIN ( PRF) VERSUS XENOGRAFT IN CLOSED SINUS LIFT WITH IMPLANT PLACEMENT ON IMPLANT STABILITY IN MAXILLARY POSTERIOR AREA Randomized Clinical Trial
{"title":"THE EFFECT OF PLATELET RICH FIBRIN ( PRF) VERSUS XENOGRAFT IN CLOSED SINUS LIFT WITH IMPLANT PLACEMENT ON IMPLANT STABILITY IN MAXILLARY POSTERIOR AREA Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"Mahmoud Shaaban, A. Fahmy, N. Sherin","doi":"10.21608/EDJ.2020.47906.1315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim of the study: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of PRF versus xenograft on implant primary stability after closed sinus elevation in the maxillary posterior area . MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were divided in to two equal groups: Group A: closed sinus lifting by Osteotome using PRF as grafting material with implant placement in 8 partially edentulous patients. Group B: Closed sinus lifting by osteotome using xenograft as a grafting material with implant placement in 8 partially edentulous patients. After implant placement, Smart peg was placed on implant and Ostell is used to record ISQ. Implant stability was measured intraoperative and at week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 for both groups. The collected results were tabulated and statistically analyzed. Results: The study results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between (PRF) and (Xenograft) groups in ISQ reading. Conclusion: Maxillary sinus elevation by osteotome technique and using PRF or xenograft as a grafting material is a predictable and effective procedure for correcting limited bone resorption in posterior areas of the maxilla.","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":"47 1","pages":"625-634"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/EDJ.2020.47906.1315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim of the study: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of PRF versus xenograft on implant primary stability after closed sinus elevation in the maxillary posterior area . MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were divided in to two equal groups: Group A: closed sinus lifting by Osteotome using PRF as grafting material with implant placement in 8 partially edentulous patients. Group B: Closed sinus lifting by osteotome using xenograft as a grafting material with implant placement in 8 partially edentulous patients. After implant placement, Smart peg was placed on implant and Ostell is used to record ISQ. Implant stability was measured intraoperative and at week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 for both groups. The collected results were tabulated and statistically analyzed. Results: The study results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between (PRF) and (Xenograft) groups in ISQ reading. Conclusion: Maxillary sinus elevation by osteotome technique and using PRF or xenograft as a grafting material is a predictable and effective procedure for correcting limited bone resorption in posterior areas of the maxilla.