Non Vitamin k Antagonist Oral Anticoagulation Assessment in Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Using Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography

Mohamed Ahmed Zaki, Hamouda Abdel Khalek El-Bahnasy
{"title":"Non Vitamin k Antagonist Oral Anticoagulation Assessment in Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Using Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography","authors":"Mohamed Ahmed Zaki, Hamouda Abdel Khalek El-Bahnasy","doi":"10.11648/j.cnn.20230701.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Background : Warfarin with optimized international normalization ratio (INR); is significantly affect the Micro embolic signals (MES), in many studies. Non vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are recently approved for stroke prevention in non valvular AF. In contrast to Warfarin; effect of NOACs on MES is not yet fully researched. Aim : To determine the effect of NOACs on MES, in comparison to warfarin in non valvular AF, to reflect the potential embolization risk. Methods : The incidence and number of MES was studied in patients with non valvular AF. Two groups in the current study; the first, patients were put on warfarin with INR levels were optimized to (2-3), and considered as a control group. The second; patients were put on NOAC (rivaroxaban, 15 mg /day). Study patients were recruited from cardiology outpatient clinics and departments (Al-Azhar University hospitals; Cairo and New Damietta, Egypt). Patients of the both groups were subjected to MES detection and counting by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) monitoring. Results : MES did not detected in 22.5% in study groups; no statistically significant differences between study groups. The incidence and number of MES; within the warfarin group; MES were detected in (30 patients, 75%), while within the rivaroxaban group (32 patients, 80%). The average number of MES; in group one were (11.65 ±7.20), and in group two (11.50 ±7.20), with no significant statistical difference also. Conclusion : The effect of warfarin and NOAC use is not statistically different and Rivaroxaban is not inferior to warfarin.","PeriodicalId":93199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical neurology and neuroscience","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical neurology and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cnn.20230701.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Background : Warfarin with optimized international normalization ratio (INR); is significantly affect the Micro embolic signals (MES), in many studies. Non vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are recently approved for stroke prevention in non valvular AF. In contrast to Warfarin; effect of NOACs on MES is not yet fully researched. Aim : To determine the effect of NOACs on MES, in comparison to warfarin in non valvular AF, to reflect the potential embolization risk. Methods : The incidence and number of MES was studied in patients with non valvular AF. Two groups in the current study; the first, patients were put on warfarin with INR levels were optimized to (2-3), and considered as a control group. The second; patients were put on NOAC (rivaroxaban, 15 mg /day). Study patients were recruited from cardiology outpatient clinics and departments (Al-Azhar University hospitals; Cairo and New Damietta, Egypt). Patients of the both groups were subjected to MES detection and counting by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) monitoring. Results : MES did not detected in 22.5% in study groups; no statistically significant differences between study groups. The incidence and number of MES; within the warfarin group; MES were detected in (30 patients, 75%), while within the rivaroxaban group (32 patients, 80%). The average number of MES; in group one were (11.65 ±7.20), and in group two (11.50 ±7.20), with no significant statistical difference also. Conclusion : The effect of warfarin and NOAC use is not statistically different and Rivaroxaban is not inferior to warfarin.
非维生素k拮抗剂口服抗凝治疗非瓣膜性房颤的经颅多普勒超声评价
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信