Evaluation of the ATRIA and CHA2DS2-VASc Scores and Their Performance on Predicting Mortality in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ozge Ozcan Abacioglu, A. Yıldırım, M. Karadeniz, Ferhat Dindaş, S. Abacioglu, N. Y. Koyunsever, Mustafa Doğduş
{"title":"Evaluation of the ATRIA and CHA2DS2-VASc Scores and Their Performance on Predicting Mortality in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism","authors":"Ozge Ozcan Abacioglu, A. Yıldırım, M. Karadeniz, Ferhat Dindaş, S. Abacioglu, N. Y. Koyunsever, Mustafa Doğduş","doi":"10.4274/haseki.galenos.2022.7783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a condition caused by thrombosis and is a common cause of death. Although there are studies of PE with CHA2DS2-VASc (C: congestive heart failure or left ventricular systolic dysfunction, H: hypertension, A: age of ≥ 75 years, D: diabetes mellitus, S: previous stroke, V: vascular disease, A: age between 65 and 74 years, Sc: female gender) and PE severity index (PESI) scores, there is no data on Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) score in PE or comparison of CHA2DS2-VASc and ATRIA scores in PE. We investigated whether ATRIA and CHA2DS2-VASc scores can predict PE and mortality in cases of PE. Methods: One hundred ninety-eight patients with PE and two hundred eighty controls between July 2017 and July 2021 were included in this retrospective study. Patients’ data was provided from the hospital’s digital system. Patients’ PESI, ATRIA, and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were calculated, and in-hospital mortality was determined as the primary end-point. Results: The mean age of the patients was 63.9±13.1 years. The frequency of male patients in the PE group was higher (p=0.04), but this difference was invalid in patients with PE who developed primary end-point (p=0.177). ATRIA and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were higher in the PE group (p<0.01 and p=0.02, respectively) and in patients who reached end-point (p=0.001 and p=0.004, respectively). A moderate-high correlation was found between the PESI score and the ATRIA and CHA2DS2-VASc scores (r=0.664, p<0.001, and r=0.484, p<0.001) in the PE group. Pairwise comparison of ROC curve analysis revealed that PESI, ATRIA, and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were not superior to each other in predicting mortality. Conclusion: Both ATRIA and CHA2DS2-VASc scores are simple, easily calculated risk scores as an alternative to the PESI score in predicting mortality in PE.","PeriodicalId":42416,"journal":{"name":"Haseki TIp Bulteni-Medical Bulletin of Haseki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haseki TIp Bulteni-Medical Bulletin of Haseki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/haseki.galenos.2022.7783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a condition caused by thrombosis and is a common cause of death. Although there are studies of PE with CHA2DS2-VASc (C: congestive heart failure or left ventricular systolic dysfunction, H: hypertension, A: age of ≥ 75 years, D: diabetes mellitus, S: previous stroke, V: vascular disease, A: age between 65 and 74 years, Sc: female gender) and PE severity index (PESI) scores, there is no data on Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) score in PE or comparison of CHA2DS2-VASc and ATRIA scores in PE. We investigated whether ATRIA and CHA2DS2-VASc scores can predict PE and mortality in cases of PE. Methods: One hundred ninety-eight patients with PE and two hundred eighty controls between July 2017 and July 2021 were included in this retrospective study. Patients’ data was provided from the hospital’s digital system. Patients’ PESI, ATRIA, and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were calculated, and in-hospital mortality was determined as the primary end-point. Results: The mean age of the patients was 63.9±13.1 years. The frequency of male patients in the PE group was higher (p=0.04), but this difference was invalid in patients with PE who developed primary end-point (p=0.177). ATRIA and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were higher in the PE group (p<0.01 and p=0.02, respectively) and in patients who reached end-point (p=0.001 and p=0.004, respectively). A moderate-high correlation was found between the PESI score and the ATRIA and CHA2DS2-VASc scores (r=0.664, p<0.001, and r=0.484, p<0.001) in the PE group. Pairwise comparison of ROC curve analysis revealed that PESI, ATRIA, and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were not superior to each other in predicting mortality. Conclusion: Both ATRIA and CHA2DS2-VASc scores are simple, easily calculated risk scores as an alternative to the PESI score in predicting mortality in PE.
急性肺栓塞患者心房和CHA2DS2-VASc评分的评价及其预测死亡率的作用
目的:肺栓塞(PE)是一种由血栓形成引起的疾病,是常见的死亡原因。虽然有关于PE合并CHA2DS2-VASc (C:充血性心力衰竭或左心室收缩功能障碍,H:高血压,A:年龄≥75岁,D:糖尿病,S:既往卒中,V:血管疾病,A:年龄在65 - 74岁之间,Sc:女性)和PE严重程度指数(PESI)评分的研究,但没有关于PE中房颤(ATRIA)评分的抗凝血和危险因素的数据,也没有关于PE中CHA2DS2-VASc和心房评分的比较数据。我们研究了ATRIA和CHA2DS2-VASc评分是否可以预测PE和PE病例的死亡率。方法:2017年7月至2021年7月期间,198例PE患者和280例对照组纳入本回顾性研究。病人的数据来自医院的数字系统。计算患者的PESI、ATRIA和CHA2DS2-VASc评分,并确定住院死亡率作为主要终点。结果:患者平均年龄63.9±13.1岁。PE组中男性患者的发生率较高(p=0.04),但这种差异在出现主要终点的PE患者中无效(p=0.177)。PE组患者ATRIA和CHA2DS2-VASc评分较高(分别为p<0.01和p=0.02),达到终点的患者评分较高(分别为p=0.001和p=0.004)。PE组PESI评分与ATRIA、CHA2DS2-VASc评分呈中高相关性(r=0.664, p<0.001, r=0.484, p<0.001)。ROC曲线两两比较分析显示,PESI、ATRIA和CHA2DS2-VASc评分在预测死亡率方面并不具有优势。结论:ATRIA和CHA2DS2-VASc评分都是简单、易于计算的风险评分,可替代PESI评分预测PE的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Haseki TIp Bulteni-Medical Bulletin of Haseki
Haseki TIp Bulteni-Medical Bulletin of Haseki MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信