NEURODEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOMES AFTER ANTI-VEGF TREATMENT FOR RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Nizma Permaisuari, Julie D. Barliana
{"title":"NEURODEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOMES AFTER ANTI-VEGF TREATMENT FOR RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS","authors":"Nizma Permaisuari, Julie D. Barliana","doi":"10.35479/ijretina.2023.vol006.iss001.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The objective of this study was to assess the neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants who have undergone intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), either as monotherapy or in combination with laser therapy, for treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Secondary, efficacy of anti-VEGF was also evaluated. \nMethods: Literature search was conducted using 7 online databases (CENTRAL, PubMed, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, EBSCO, ProQuest, and JSTOR). Studies were selected based on the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary outcomes were neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI), severe NDI (sNDI), neurodevelopmental scores, and cerebral palsy (CP) incidence. Secondary outcomes included impairment and severe impairment of each domain (motor, cognitive, and language) and retreatment of ROP. \nResult: Seventeen studies were included. Random-effects model meta-analysis showed no differences were observed between anti-VEGF compared to control group in NDI (unadjusted odds ratio (uOR) 1.28; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 1.94), sNDI (uOR 1.33; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.93), and CP outcomes . Meta-analysis showed insignificant result with lower overall scores, motor, cognitive, and language domains associated with anti-VEGF treatment. Secondary outcomes showed inferior cognitive impairment (OR 1.41; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.92) and higher retreatment rate (OR 47.55; 95% CI: 12.35 to 183.09) in anti-VEGF group. \nConclusion: There were no differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes between anti-VEGF and control group. Despite not causing any adverse neurodevelopmental effect, clinicians should carefully weigh the benefits and risks of anti-VEGF injection for treating infants with ROP, since it has higher retreatment rate.","PeriodicalId":33128,"journal":{"name":"IJRETINA International Journal of Retina","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJRETINA International Journal of Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35479/ijretina.2023.vol006.iss001.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to assess the neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants who have undergone intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), either as monotherapy or in combination with laser therapy, for treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Secondary, efficacy of anti-VEGF was also evaluated. Methods: Literature search was conducted using 7 online databases (CENTRAL, PubMed, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, EBSCO, ProQuest, and JSTOR). Studies were selected based on the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary outcomes were neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI), severe NDI (sNDI), neurodevelopmental scores, and cerebral palsy (CP) incidence. Secondary outcomes included impairment and severe impairment of each domain (motor, cognitive, and language) and retreatment of ROP. Result: Seventeen studies were included. Random-effects model meta-analysis showed no differences were observed between anti-VEGF compared to control group in NDI (unadjusted odds ratio (uOR) 1.28; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 1.94), sNDI (uOR 1.33; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.93), and CP outcomes . Meta-analysis showed insignificant result with lower overall scores, motor, cognitive, and language domains associated with anti-VEGF treatment. Secondary outcomes showed inferior cognitive impairment (OR 1.41; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.92) and higher retreatment rate (OR 47.55; 95% CI: 12.35 to 183.09) in anti-VEGF group. Conclusion: There were no differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes between anti-VEGF and control group. Despite not causing any adverse neurodevelopmental effect, clinicians should carefully weigh the benefits and risks of anti-VEGF injection for treating infants with ROP, since it has higher retreatment rate.
抗vegf治疗早产儿视网膜病变后的神经发育结局:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
前言:本研究的目的是评估接受玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)治疗的早产儿的神经发育结果,无论是单一治疗还是联合激光治疗,用于治疗早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)。其次,还评估了抗vegf的疗效。方法:采用CENTRAL、PubMed、ScienceDirect、SCOPUS、EBSCO、ProQuest、JSTOR等7个在线数据库进行文献检索。根据既定的纳入和排除标准选择研究。主要结局为神经发育障碍(NDI)、严重NDI (sNDI)、神经发育评分和脑瘫(CP)发生率。次要结果包括各领域(运动、认知和语言)的损伤和严重损伤以及ROP的再治疗。结果:纳入17项研究。随机效应模型荟萃分析显示,与对照组相比,抗vegf组在NDI中没有差异(未校正优势比(uOR) 1.28;95%置信区间(CI) 0.85 ~ 1.94), sNDI (uOR 1.33;95% CI 0.92 ~ 1.93)和CP结局。荟萃分析显示,抗vegf治疗与较低的总分、运动、认知和语言领域相关,结果不显著。次要结局显示认知障碍(OR 1.41;95% CI: 1.03 ~ 1.92)和更高的再处理率(OR 47.55;95% CI: 12.35 ~ 183.09)。结论:抗vegf组与对照组在神经发育方面无明显差异。尽管不会造成任何不良的神经发育影响,但临床医生应仔细权衡抗vegf注射治疗婴儿ROP的益处和风险,因为它有更高的复治率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信