Innovative Train Technologies Energy Comparison on One Non Electrified Railway

C. Depature, T. Letrouvé
{"title":"Innovative Train Technologies Energy Comparison on One Non Electrified Railway","authors":"C. Depature, T. Letrouvé","doi":"10.1109/VPPC49601.2020.9330938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compare the energy performance of several railway traction technologies. After validating the powertrain model of a regional diesel train with experimental measurements, an energy comparison of different green technologies is carried out: hybrid diesel train, battery train and fuel cell train. This initial analysis shows that hybridization, for example, allows energy savings of up to 20% on the nonelectrified track studied, while battery traction alone saves up to 70%. This study is a first step in choosing the use of a green technology, which must be carried out in accordance with a territorial context. The economic aspects, the infrastructure needed and the operating requirements of the railway equipment will have to be integrated in a future study.","PeriodicalId":6851,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC)","volume":"26 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC49601.2020.9330938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper compare the energy performance of several railway traction technologies. After validating the powertrain model of a regional diesel train with experimental measurements, an energy comparison of different green technologies is carried out: hybrid diesel train, battery train and fuel cell train. This initial analysis shows that hybridization, for example, allows energy savings of up to 20% on the nonelectrified track studied, while battery traction alone saves up to 70%. This study is a first step in choosing the use of a green technology, which must be carried out in accordance with a territorial context. The economic aspects, the infrastructure needed and the operating requirements of the railway equipment will have to be integrated in a future study.
某非电气化铁路创新列车技术能耗比较
本文比较了几种铁路牵引技术的能源性能。在对某区域柴油列车动力系统模型进行实验验证的基础上,对混合动力柴油列车、蓄电池列车和燃料电池列车三种绿色技术进行了能量比较。例如,初步分析表明,在非电气化轨道上,混合动力可以节省高达20%的能源,而单独使用电池牵引可以节省高达70%的能源。这项研究是选择使用绿色技术的第一步,必须根据地域情况进行。经济方面、所需的基础设施和铁路设备的操作要求将在今后的研究中综合考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信