Sellar Floor Reconstruction with and without Intrasellar Fat Packing after Endoscopic Resection of Large Pituitary Macroadenomas with Evident Intraoperative CSF Leak

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY
M. Darwish, Walid Nanous, Khalaf Hamead, M. Ismail
{"title":"Sellar Floor Reconstruction with and without Intrasellar Fat Packing after Endoscopic Resection of Large Pituitary Macroadenomas with Evident Intraoperative CSF Leak","authors":"M. Darwish, Walid Nanous, Khalaf Hamead, M. Ismail","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1742475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background  Intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak is not uncommon with endoscopic transsphenoidal surgical excision of pituitary macroadenomas. How to seal the defect and prevent postoperative leak is still a matter of debate. Objectives  In patients with CSF leak, we tried to figure out which is more important in preventing postoperative leak, is it the sellar fat packing, is it tight repair of the sellar floor, or do we need to combine them both? Patients and Methods  Over 5 years, in patients with evident intraoperative CSF leak, with growing experience supported by positive postoperative results, we shifted gradually from intrasellar packing using combined fat graft and bioabsorbable materials (SURGICEL FIBRILLAR/Gelfoam) (group A, n =15) to only bioabsorbable materials (group B, n  = 18), either of which is followed by tight repair of the sellar floor. Results  Postoperative clinical assessment did not differ significantly between both groups at early, midterm, and long-term follow-up intervals. We did not have any patients with delayed postoperative CSF leak or symptomatic empty sella syndrome (ESS). Conclusion  There is no difference in the incidence of postoperative CSF leak and clinical ESS among both groups, indicating that tight sellar floor repair is more important than packing the sellar cavity with or without fat graft.","PeriodicalId":53938,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":"13 1","pages":"047 - 050"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background  Intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak is not uncommon with endoscopic transsphenoidal surgical excision of pituitary macroadenomas. How to seal the defect and prevent postoperative leak is still a matter of debate. Objectives  In patients with CSF leak, we tried to figure out which is more important in preventing postoperative leak, is it the sellar fat packing, is it tight repair of the sellar floor, or do we need to combine them both? Patients and Methods  Over 5 years, in patients with evident intraoperative CSF leak, with growing experience supported by positive postoperative results, we shifted gradually from intrasellar packing using combined fat graft and bioabsorbable materials (SURGICEL FIBRILLAR/Gelfoam) (group A, n =15) to only bioabsorbable materials (group B, n  = 18), either of which is followed by tight repair of the sellar floor. Results  Postoperative clinical assessment did not differ significantly between both groups at early, midterm, and long-term follow-up intervals. We did not have any patients with delayed postoperative CSF leak or symptomatic empty sella syndrome (ESS). Conclusion  There is no difference in the incidence of postoperative CSF leak and clinical ESS among both groups, indicating that tight sellar floor repair is more important than packing the sellar cavity with or without fat graft.
术中有明显脑脊液漏的垂体大腺瘤内镜切除术后鞍底重建
背景在经蝶腔内镜切除垂体大腺瘤时,术中脑脊液(CSF)泄漏并不少见。如何封堵缺损,防止术后渗漏仍是一个有争议的问题。目的在脑脊液漏患者中,我们试图找出预防术后漏的更重要的因素,是鞍底脂肪填充,还是鞍底的紧密修复,还是我们需要将两者结合起来?5年来,在术中有明显脑脊液泄漏的患者中,随着术后积极结果的支持,我们逐渐从使用联合脂肪移植和生物可吸收材料(SURGICEL fibrar /Gelfoam) (A组,n =15)的鞍内填充转变为仅使用生物可吸收材料(B组,n = 18),这两种方法都是对鞍底进行紧密修复。结果两组在早期、中期和长期随访期间的术后临床评价无显著差异。我们没有任何患者出现迟发性术后脑脊液漏或症状性空蝶鞍综合征(ESS)。结论两组患者术后脑脊液漏及ESS发生率无显著差异,提示紧密鞍底修复比采用或不采用脂肪填充鞍腔更为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信