Personal and Institutional Timelines for Hurricane Preparedness, Recovery and Mitigation

Alessandra Jerolleman, Jerry V. Graves
{"title":"Personal and Institutional Timelines for Hurricane Preparedness, Recovery and Mitigation","authors":"Alessandra Jerolleman, Jerry V. Graves","doi":"10.1177/028072702003800105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Institutional and personal timelines are constantly placed in tension by hurricanes, from decisions regarding preparedness and evacuation, to recovery and hazard mitigation decisions. Government timelines for evacuation, for example, must allow sufficient time for the large scale movement of a population; but, individually, evacuation timelines are impacted by a myriad of personal decisions including caregiving concerns and employment concerns, both of which tend to push the decision making window further out. Another example is in recovery, where institutional timelines for recovery assistance, spread out across several agencies and timescales, do not readily align with personal and family decision-making timelines in which returning to a sense of normalcy is prioritized highest. These varying timelines result in complications with the marrying of various sources of assistance and lead to both unnecessary confusion and also missed opportunities to maximize recovery assistance. In hazard mitigation, the fact that the majority of funds are available after damages have occurred already creates an inverted timeline in which preventative actions are taken after the fact, but the delays inherent to the management of the programs also create extensive delays to family recovery timelines.","PeriodicalId":84928,"journal":{"name":"International journal of mass emergencies and disasters","volume":"12 1","pages":"77 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of mass emergencies and disasters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/028072702003800105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Institutional and personal timelines are constantly placed in tension by hurricanes, from decisions regarding preparedness and evacuation, to recovery and hazard mitigation decisions. Government timelines for evacuation, for example, must allow sufficient time for the large scale movement of a population; but, individually, evacuation timelines are impacted by a myriad of personal decisions including caregiving concerns and employment concerns, both of which tend to push the decision making window further out. Another example is in recovery, where institutional timelines for recovery assistance, spread out across several agencies and timescales, do not readily align with personal and family decision-making timelines in which returning to a sense of normalcy is prioritized highest. These varying timelines result in complications with the marrying of various sources of assistance and lead to both unnecessary confusion and also missed opportunities to maximize recovery assistance. In hazard mitigation, the fact that the majority of funds are available after damages have occurred already creates an inverted timeline in which preventative actions are taken after the fact, but the delays inherent to the management of the programs also create extensive delays to family recovery timelines.
个人和机构的飓风防备、恢复和减灾时间表
从有关准备和疏散的决策,到恢复和减轻危害的决策,机构和个人的时间表不断受到飓风的影响。例如,政府的疏散时间表必须为人口的大规模迁移留出足够的时间;但是,就个人而言,撤离时间表受到无数个人决定的影响,包括照顾问题和就业问题,这两者都倾向于将决策窗口进一步推后。另一个例子是在恢复方面,恢复援助的机构时间表分散在几个机构和时间表上,不容易与个人和家庭决策时间表保持一致,在这些时间表中,恢复正常的感觉是最优先考虑的。这些不同的时间表导致各种援助来源的结合复杂化,导致不必要的混乱,也错过了最大限度地恢复援助的机会。在减轻灾害方面,大部分资金是在损失发生后才到位的事实,已经造成了一个颠倒的时间轴,在这个时间轴中,预防措施是在事后采取的,但项目管理固有的延误也造成了家庭恢复时间轴的广泛延误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信