No Simple Dwelling: Design, Politics, and the Mid-Twentieth-Century American Economy House

Pub Date : 2019-07-16 DOI:10.5749/buildland.26.1.0073
E. Stiles
{"title":"No Simple Dwelling: Design, Politics, and the Mid-Twentieth-Century American Economy House","authors":"E. Stiles","doi":"10.5749/buildland.26.1.0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:In the 1940s and early 1950s, the American home-building industry embarked on a period of intensive design and planning experimentation as they endeavored to produce faster, cheaper, and better-quality homes for lower income segments of the housing market than it had ever served before. Builders across the country engaged in robust design discourse, networks of design exchange, and campaigns of informal design research to produce what they termed “economy houses,” or homes within the financial reach of the nation’s lower-middle-class or working-class wage earners. Period builders experimented with modern and modular design, streamlined production processes, and cooperative building to create increasingly efficient and inexpensive economy houses. The results of their efforts reflect the building community’s design acumen as well as the complex political economy of period housing development that guided builders’ product development and design thinking. Joint examination of builders’ products and industry design discourse reveal how the home-building industry’s experimentation with economy housing simultaneously advanced the modernization of the building industry and reinforced its arguments in support of free markets, unfettered housing production, and private-sector building as the best answer to America’s housing needs.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/buildland.26.1.0073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT:In the 1940s and early 1950s, the American home-building industry embarked on a period of intensive design and planning experimentation as they endeavored to produce faster, cheaper, and better-quality homes for lower income segments of the housing market than it had ever served before. Builders across the country engaged in robust design discourse, networks of design exchange, and campaigns of informal design research to produce what they termed “economy houses,” or homes within the financial reach of the nation’s lower-middle-class or working-class wage earners. Period builders experimented with modern and modular design, streamlined production processes, and cooperative building to create increasingly efficient and inexpensive economy houses. The results of their efforts reflect the building community’s design acumen as well as the complex political economy of period housing development that guided builders’ product development and design thinking. Joint examination of builders’ products and industry design discourse reveal how the home-building industry’s experimentation with economy housing simultaneously advanced the modernization of the building industry and reinforced its arguments in support of free markets, unfettered housing production, and private-sector building as the best answer to America’s housing needs.
分享
查看原文
不简单的住宅:设计、政治和二十世纪中期美国经济住宅
摘要:在20世纪40年代和50年代初,美国住宅建筑行业开始了密集的设计和规划实验时期,他们努力为住房市场的低收入群体提供更快、更便宜和更高质量的住房。全国各地的建筑商积极参与设计讨论、设计交流网络和非正式设计研究活动,以建造他们所谓的“经济型住宅”,即在全国中下阶层或工薪阶层的经济能力范围内的住宅。建筑师们尝试了现代和模块化的设计,简化的生产过程,以及合作建筑,以创造越来越高效和廉价的经济住宅。他们的努力结果反映了建筑界的设计敏锐度,以及指导建筑商产品开发和设计思维的时期住房开发的复杂政治经济。对建筑商产品和工业设计话语的联合考察揭示了住宅建筑行业对经济型住房的实验如何同时推进了建筑行业的现代化,并加强了其支持自由市场、不受约束的住房生产和私营部门建筑作为美国住房需求的最佳答案的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信