How Competence of Production, Attention, Retention, Motivation, and Innovation can Improve Students’ Scientific Writing Skills

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
I. Mulyaningsih, W. Rahmat, D. Maknun, Winci Firdaus
{"title":"How Competence of Production, Attention, Retention, Motivation, and Innovation can Improve Students’ Scientific Writing Skills","authors":"I. Mulyaningsih, W. Rahmat, D. Maknun, Winci Firdaus","doi":"10.26858/ijole.v6i4.34360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to prove the role of production, attention, retention, motivation, and innovation in students’ scientific writing skills at the Islamic Study College (PTAI) in Cirebon. This experimental research used a quasi-experimental design and a nonequivalent control group design. The experiment was conducted in two groups, experiment and control groups. The research samples included Lecturers from a public Islamic University. The experiment group samples were 38 students of the Philosophy of Religion Department. The control group consisted of 33 Islamic Guidance and Counseling Department students. The collection technique used was tested, comprised of a pretest and posttest. The two groups were given the same tests (pretest and posttest), and the results were compared. The instrument used in this research was a test. Validity determination for the scientific writing ability variable was not measured statistically but through construct validity. The reliability test resulted in a reliability coefficient from an assessor of 0.82, while all assessors' average rating reliability coefficient was 0.93. The normality test results on scientific writing ability data with the control class show Lo = 0.106 < Lt = 0.154. Meanwhile, the normality test on the experiment class’s scientific writing ability data results in a maximum Lo of 0.106 and Lt = 0.144. The balance test results show the score of tcount = 1.51 < ttable = 1.67. The data analysis with t independent test resulted in the score of tcount > ttable (10.45 > 1.65). This shows that the competence of production, attention, retention, motivation, and innovation can improve students’ scientific writing skills.","PeriodicalId":40801,"journal":{"name":"IJoLE-International Journal of Language Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJoLE-International Journal of Language Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i4.34360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This research aimed to prove the role of production, attention, retention, motivation, and innovation in students’ scientific writing skills at the Islamic Study College (PTAI) in Cirebon. This experimental research used a quasi-experimental design and a nonequivalent control group design. The experiment was conducted in two groups, experiment and control groups. The research samples included Lecturers from a public Islamic University. The experiment group samples were 38 students of the Philosophy of Religion Department. The control group consisted of 33 Islamic Guidance and Counseling Department students. The collection technique used was tested, comprised of a pretest and posttest. The two groups were given the same tests (pretest and posttest), and the results were compared. The instrument used in this research was a test. Validity determination for the scientific writing ability variable was not measured statistically but through construct validity. The reliability test resulted in a reliability coefficient from an assessor of 0.82, while all assessors' average rating reliability coefficient was 0.93. The normality test results on scientific writing ability data with the control class show Lo = 0.106 < Lt = 0.154. Meanwhile, the normality test on the experiment class’s scientific writing ability data results in a maximum Lo of 0.106 and Lt = 0.144. The balance test results show the score of tcount = 1.51 < ttable = 1.67. The data analysis with t independent test resulted in the score of tcount > ttable (10.45 > 1.65). This shows that the competence of production, attention, retention, motivation, and innovation can improve students’ scientific writing skills.
产生能力、注意能力、保留能力、动机能力和创新能力如何提高学生的科学写作技能
本研究旨在证明生产、注意力、保留、动机和创新在西里本伊斯兰研究学院(PTAI)学生科学写作技能中的作用。本实验研究采用准实验设计和非等效对照组设计。试验分为试验组和对照组。研究样本包括一所公立伊斯兰大学的讲师。实验组样本为宗教哲学系38名学生。对照组为33名伊斯兰指导与咨询系学生。对所使用的收集技术进行了测试,包括前测和后测。两组进行相同的测试(前测和后测),并比较结果。在这项研究中使用的仪器是一个测试。科学写作能力变量的效度决定不是通过统计测量,而是通过结构效度。信度测试结果显示,评核员的信度系数为0.82,而所有评核员的平均评核信度系数为0.93。对照班科学写作能力数据的正态性检验结果为Lo = 0.106 < Lt = 0.154。同时,对实验班科学写作能力数据进行正态性检验,最大Lo为0.106,Lt = 0.144。balance test结果显示tcount = 1.51 < ttable = 1.67。采用t独立检验进行数据分析,tcount评分> table(10.45 > 1.65)。由此可见,产生能力、注意能力、保留能力、动机能力和创新能力能够提高学生的科技写作能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信