{"title":"Peasant proprietors, social mobility and risk aversion in the early Middle Ages: an Iberian case study","authors":"Robert Portass","doi":"10.1080/03071022.2023.2179742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article investigates an important but neglected question concerning the social and economic dynamics of village communities in early medieval north-western Iberia: why did ‘medium owners’ – that is, peasants who accumulated significant landed holdings – assemble portfolios of property large enough to produce significant surpluses in an age in which the institutional infrastructure needed to marketise such surpluses was rudimentary? The pursuit of upward social mobility is most commonly posed as the answer to this question; but how exactly did medium owners stand to gain? After all, north-western Iberia in the early Middle Ages was a scarcely monetised society in which would-be medium owners could not expect to be paid in coin for the sale of their surplus and consequently see their options as buyers increase. Why, then, assume the risks involved in expanding one’s farming operation? Certainly, the acquisition of landed wealth brought with it clear advantages, including symbolic prestige and an expanded client network. Yet this article suggests that we can better understand why socially mobile peasants sought to own landed resources capable of producing significant surpluses only if we are prepared to re-examine important historiographical motifs, including peasant risk aversion, and the culturally constituted nature of the subsistence minimum.","PeriodicalId":21866,"journal":{"name":"Social History","volume":"87 1","pages":"185 - 213"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03071022.2023.2179742","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article investigates an important but neglected question concerning the social and economic dynamics of village communities in early medieval north-western Iberia: why did ‘medium owners’ – that is, peasants who accumulated significant landed holdings – assemble portfolios of property large enough to produce significant surpluses in an age in which the institutional infrastructure needed to marketise such surpluses was rudimentary? The pursuit of upward social mobility is most commonly posed as the answer to this question; but how exactly did medium owners stand to gain? After all, north-western Iberia in the early Middle Ages was a scarcely monetised society in which would-be medium owners could not expect to be paid in coin for the sale of their surplus and consequently see their options as buyers increase. Why, then, assume the risks involved in expanding one’s farming operation? Certainly, the acquisition of landed wealth brought with it clear advantages, including symbolic prestige and an expanded client network. Yet this article suggests that we can better understand why socially mobile peasants sought to own landed resources capable of producing significant surpluses only if we are prepared to re-examine important historiographical motifs, including peasant risk aversion, and the culturally constituted nature of the subsistence minimum.
期刊介绍:
For more than thirty years, Social History has published scholarly work of consistently high quality, without restrictions of period or geography. Social History is now minded to develop further the scope of the journal in content and to seek further experiment in terms of format. The editorial object remains unchanged - to enable discussion, to provoke argument, and to create space for criticism and scholarship. In recent years the content of Social History has expanded to include a good deal more European and American work as well as, increasingly, work from and about Africa, South Asia and Latin America.