Robust Radiomic Feature Selection in Digital Mammography: Understanding the Effect of Imaging Acquisition Physics Using Phantom and Clinical Data Analysis.

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Teaching Theology and Religion Pub Date : 2020-02-01 Epub Date: 2020-03-16 DOI:10.1117/12.2549163
Raymond J Acciavatti, Eric A Cohen, Omid Haji Maghsoudi, Aimilia Gastounioti, Lauren Pantalone, Meng-Kang Hsieh, Emily F Conant, Christopher G Scott, Stacey J Winham, Karla Kerlikowske, Celine Vachon, Andrew D A Maidment, Despina Kontos
{"title":"Robust Radiomic Feature Selection in Digital Mammography: Understanding the Effect of Imaging Acquisition Physics Using Phantom and Clinical Data Analysis.","authors":"Raymond J Acciavatti, Eric A Cohen, Omid Haji Maghsoudi, Aimilia Gastounioti, Lauren Pantalone, Meng-Kang Hsieh, Emily F Conant, Christopher G Scott, Stacey J Winham, Karla Kerlikowske, Celine Vachon, Andrew D A Maidment, Despina Kontos","doi":"10.1117/12.2549163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies have shown that combining calculations of radiomic features with estimates of mammographic density results in an even better assessment of breast cancer risk than density alone. However, to ensure that risk assessment calculations are consistent across different imaging acquisition settings, it is important to identify features that are not overly sensitive to changes in these settings. In this study, digital mammography (DM) images of an anthropomorphic phantom (\"Rachel\", Gammex 169, Madison, WI) were acquired at various technique settings. We varied kV and mAs, which control contrast and noise, respectively. DM images in women with negative screening exams were also analyzed. Radiomic features were calculated in the raw (\"FOR PROCESSING\") DM images; i.e., grey-level histogram, co-occurrence, run length, fractal dimension, Gabor Wavelet, local binary pattern, Laws, and co-occurrence Laws features. For each feature, the range of variation across technique settings in phantom images was calculated. This range was scaled against the range of variation in the clinical distribution (specifically, the range corresponding to the middle 90% of the distribution). In order for a radiomic feature to be considered robust, this metric of imaging acquisition variation (IAV) should be as small as possible (approaching zero). An IAV threshold of 0.25 was proposed for the purpose of this study. Out of 341 features, 284 features (83%) met the threshold IAV ≤ 0.25. In conclusion, we have developed a method to identify robust radiomic features in DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":43110,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Theology and Religion","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10655898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Theology and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2549163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have shown that combining calculations of radiomic features with estimates of mammographic density results in an even better assessment of breast cancer risk than density alone. However, to ensure that risk assessment calculations are consistent across different imaging acquisition settings, it is important to identify features that are not overly sensitive to changes in these settings. In this study, digital mammography (DM) images of an anthropomorphic phantom ("Rachel", Gammex 169, Madison, WI) were acquired at various technique settings. We varied kV and mAs, which control contrast and noise, respectively. DM images in women with negative screening exams were also analyzed. Radiomic features were calculated in the raw ("FOR PROCESSING") DM images; i.e., grey-level histogram, co-occurrence, run length, fractal dimension, Gabor Wavelet, local binary pattern, Laws, and co-occurrence Laws features. For each feature, the range of variation across technique settings in phantom images was calculated. This range was scaled against the range of variation in the clinical distribution (specifically, the range corresponding to the middle 90% of the distribution). In order for a radiomic feature to be considered robust, this metric of imaging acquisition variation (IAV) should be as small as possible (approaching zero). An IAV threshold of 0.25 was proposed for the purpose of this study. Out of 341 features, 284 features (83%) met the threshold IAV ≤ 0.25. In conclusion, we have developed a method to identify robust radiomic features in DM.

数字乳房x线照相术中健壮的放射学特征选择:利用幻影和临床数据分析了解成像采集物理的影响。
研究表明,将放射学特征的计算与乳房x线摄影密度的估计相结合,可以更好地评估乳腺癌的风险,而不仅仅是密度。然而,为了确保风险评估计算在不同的成像采集设置中是一致的,识别对这些设置的变化不过于敏感的特征是很重要的。在这项研究中,在不同的技术设置下获得了拟人幻影(“Rachel”,Gammex 169, Madison, WI)的数字乳房x线摄影(DM)图像。我们改变kV和ma,分别控制对比度和噪声。对筛查阴性的女性的糖尿病影像也进行了分析。在原始(“FOR PROCESSING”)DM图像中计算放射学特征;即灰度直方图、共现、行程长度、分形维数、Gabor小波、局部二值模式、规律、共现规律等特征。对于每个特征,计算了不同技术设置在幻影图像中的变化范围。这个范围是根据临床分布的变化范围(具体来说,是与分布中间90%对应的范围)进行缩放的。为了使放射学特征具有鲁棒性,成像获取变化(IAV)的度量应该尽可能小(接近于零)。本研究建议IAV阈值为0.25。在341个特征中,284个特征(83%)满足阈值IAV≤0.25。总之,我们已经开发了一种方法来识别糖尿病的稳健放射学特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信