Prevalence of Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp from Chicken Meat Samples of Bharatpur, Chitwan

R. Thapa, D. B. Thapa, A. Chapagain
{"title":"Prevalence of Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp from Chicken Meat Samples of Bharatpur, Chitwan","authors":"R. Thapa, D. B. Thapa, A. Chapagain","doi":"10.3126/jiaas.v36i1.48428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bacterial contamination and high antibiotic resistance properties of broiler chicken meat are of major risk to public consumers and poultry farming. With the major objective to determine the prevalence rate of E. coli and Salmonella and their antibiotic resistance properties we conducted this cross-sectional study for the period of three months (April- July, 2018) at National Avian Disease Investigation Laboratory, Bharatpur, Chitwan. A total of 100 samples were collected in sterile/dry plastic bags from different shops located in the vicinity of Bharatpur, and transported to the laboratory for further processing following standard microbiological techniques. Samples  were crushed in mortar pestle followed by streaking on EMB agar and XLD agar for isolation of E. coli and Salmonella. Isolates were identified by determining their colony characters, gram staining and biochemical results. Major isolates in our study was E. coli (n=56/100; 56%) and isolation rate was higher from the fresh meat sample (n=51/70; 72.8%) and which was washed by ground water (n=63/88; 71.5%). Isolation rate of E. coli and Salmonella was not significantly associated with the areas from where the samples were collected in urban areas (for E. coli; p=0.68 and for Salmonella; p=0.50 respectively) however higher rate of isolation was seen form shop located in urban area. Antibiotic sensitivity testing revealed that Ciprofloxacin was most effective against E. coli (n=45/56; 80.3%) and Azithromycin was effective against Salmonella, (n=9/10; 90.0%) however, both isolates showed maximum resistance over Nalidixic Acid. This study is strongly indicative of improper sanitary practices for chicken meat handling and suggests for performing antibiotics susceptibility testing against the bacteria before prescribing any antibiotics.","PeriodicalId":89696,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jiaas.v36i1.48428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bacterial contamination and high antibiotic resistance properties of broiler chicken meat are of major risk to public consumers and poultry farming. With the major objective to determine the prevalence rate of E. coli and Salmonella and their antibiotic resistance properties we conducted this cross-sectional study for the period of three months (April- July, 2018) at National Avian Disease Investigation Laboratory, Bharatpur, Chitwan. A total of 100 samples were collected in sterile/dry plastic bags from different shops located in the vicinity of Bharatpur, and transported to the laboratory for further processing following standard microbiological techniques. Samples  were crushed in mortar pestle followed by streaking on EMB agar and XLD agar for isolation of E. coli and Salmonella. Isolates were identified by determining their colony characters, gram staining and biochemical results. Major isolates in our study was E. coli (n=56/100; 56%) and isolation rate was higher from the fresh meat sample (n=51/70; 72.8%) and which was washed by ground water (n=63/88; 71.5%). Isolation rate of E. coli and Salmonella was not significantly associated with the areas from where the samples were collected in urban areas (for E. coli; p=0.68 and for Salmonella; p=0.50 respectively) however higher rate of isolation was seen form shop located in urban area. Antibiotic sensitivity testing revealed that Ciprofloxacin was most effective against E. coli (n=45/56; 80.3%) and Azithromycin was effective against Salmonella, (n=9/10; 90.0%) however, both isolates showed maximum resistance over Nalidixic Acid. This study is strongly indicative of improper sanitary practices for chicken meat handling and suggests for performing antibiotics susceptibility testing against the bacteria before prescribing any antibiotics.
Chitwan巴拉特普尔市鸡肉样本中大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌的流行情况
肉鸡肉类的细菌污染和高抗生素耐药性是公众消费者和家禽养殖业面临的主要风险。为了确定大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌的患病率及其抗生素耐药性,我们在Chitwan巴拉特普尔国家禽病调查实验室进行了为期三个月(2018年4月至7月)的横断面研究。从巴拉特普尔附近的不同商店收集了100个样本,装在无菌/干塑料袋中,并运送到实验室,按照标准微生物技术进行进一步处理。用研钵将样品粉碎,然后在EMB琼脂和XLD琼脂上划线,分离大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌。通过菌落特征、革兰氏染色和生化结果对分离菌株进行鉴定。本研究的主要分离株为大肠杆菌(n=56/100;56%),鲜肉样品的分离率较高(n=51/70;72.8%),被地下水冲刷(n=63/88;71.5%)。在城市地区,大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌的分离率与样本采集地点没有显著相关性(大肠杆菌;p=0.68,沙门氏菌;P =0.50),但城区店铺的隔离率较高。抗生素敏感性试验显示环丙沙星对大肠杆菌最有效(n=45/56;80.3%)和阿奇霉素对沙门氏菌有效(n=9/10;90.0%),但两株菌株对萘啶酸均表现出最大的耐药性。这项研究强烈表明,处理鸡肉的卫生措施不当,并建议在开任何抗生素处方之前对细菌进行抗生素敏感性测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书