COVID-19 and health care worker exposure at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital

Sara Glatt, L. Winchow, Merika Tsitsi, E. Musenge, C. Menezes
{"title":"COVID-19 and health care worker exposure at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital","authors":"Sara Glatt, L. Winchow, Merika Tsitsi, E. Musenge, C. Menezes","doi":"10.18772/26180197.2023.v5n2a3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Health care workers (HCWs) are at increased risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Appropriate risk assessments and testing are essential to reduce transmission and avoid workforce depletion. Objective: To investigate the risk of COVID-19 infection among HCWs who fulfil the person under investigation case definition or had exposure to a confirmed COVID-19 contact. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of HCWs who were exposed to and/or tested for COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic. Data collected included demographics, exposure type, risk level, and COVID-19 test result. Frequency distribution tables, bivariate analyses, univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. Results: Among the 1111 HCWs reviewed, 643 were tested with 35.6% positive results. PUI's accounted for 62.4% of positive cases. Symptomatic HCWs with no known contact were at a greater risk of infection than those with a patient exposure (p═0.001). The risk of testing positive was higher after a patient exposure (p═0.000) compared to a co-worker contact. Patient-facing designations had a higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection than non-clinical designations (p═0.013). The exception to this was security personnel who were 28 times more likely to test positive than any other designation (p═0.000). Conclusion: There is a higher positivity rate among HCWs than the general population. The presence of symptoms warrants testing. Nosocomial transmission was derived from patients more than co-worker contacts. Precautions in the workplace need to be reinforced to protect the health and safety of HCWs during this pandemic. These findings should assist with preparedness for future pandemics.","PeriodicalId":75326,"journal":{"name":"Wits journal of clinical medicine","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wits journal of clinical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18772/26180197.2023.v5n2a3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health care workers (HCWs) are at increased risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Appropriate risk assessments and testing are essential to reduce transmission and avoid workforce depletion. Objective: To investigate the risk of COVID-19 infection among HCWs who fulfil the person under investigation case definition or had exposure to a confirmed COVID-19 contact. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of HCWs who were exposed to and/or tested for COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic. Data collected included demographics, exposure type, risk level, and COVID-19 test result. Frequency distribution tables, bivariate analyses, univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. Results: Among the 1111 HCWs reviewed, 643 were tested with 35.6% positive results. PUI's accounted for 62.4% of positive cases. Symptomatic HCWs with no known contact were at a greater risk of infection than those with a patient exposure (p═0.001). The risk of testing positive was higher after a patient exposure (p═0.000) compared to a co-worker contact. Patient-facing designations had a higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection than non-clinical designations (p═0.013). The exception to this was security personnel who were 28 times more likely to test positive than any other designation (p═0.000). Conclusion: There is a higher positivity rate among HCWs than the general population. The presence of symptoms warrants testing. Nosocomial transmission was derived from patients more than co-worker contacts. Precautions in the workplace need to be reinforced to protect the health and safety of HCWs during this pandemic. These findings should assist with preparedness for future pandemics.
克里斯·哈尼·巴拉格瓦纳特学术医院的COVID-19和医护人员暴露
背景:卫生保健工作者(HCWs)感染2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的风险增加。适当的风险评估和检测对于减少传播和避免人力消耗至关重要。目的:调查符合被调查人员病例定义或与确诊的COVID-19接触者有过接触的卫生保健人员感染COVID-19的风险。方法:我们对在第一波大流行期间暴露于COVID-19和/或进行COVID-19检测的医护人员进行了回顾性审查。收集的数据包括人口统计、暴露类型、风险水平和COVID-19检测结果。进行了频率分布表、双变量分析、单变量分析和多变量分析。结果:1111名卫生保健工作者中,643名接受检测,阳性率为35.6%。PUI阳性病例占62.4%。没有已知接触者的有症状的医护人员比有患者接触者有更大的感染风险(p = 0.001)。与同事接触相比,患者接触后检测呈阳性的风险更高(p = 0.000)。面向患者的指定比非临床指定有更高的SARS-CoV-2感染风险(p = 0.013)。唯一的例外是安检人员,他们的检测结果呈阳性的可能性是其他人员的28倍(p = 0.000)。结论:卫生保健工作者的乙肝病毒阳性率高于一般人群。症状的存在值得检验。医院传播主要来自患者而非同事接触。需要加强工作场所的预防措施,以在本次大流行期间保护卫生工作者的健康和安全。这些发现应有助于为未来的大流行做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信