A review on conventional psychoacoustic evaluation tools, methods and algorithms

Alexander Stojanow, Judith Liebetrau
{"title":"A review on conventional psychoacoustic evaluation tools, methods and algorithms","authors":"Alexander Stojanow, Judith Liebetrau","doi":"10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, psychoacoustic analysis of a sound is often applied for quick quantification of its auditory perception. Such hearing-related quantities also referred to as psychoacoustic parameters are meant to be a good representation of the human auditory perception. Predictive models are available to estimate the perception of these quantities. However, calculated psychoacoustic parameters show a lack of accuracy when compared with subjective listening test results for complex and authentic sounds. This paper shows some deficiencies and strengths of conventional algorithms and offers a few ideas for improvement.","PeriodicalId":6645,"journal":{"name":"2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","volume":"172 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Nowadays, psychoacoustic analysis of a sound is often applied for quick quantification of its auditory perception. Such hearing-related quantities also referred to as psychoacoustic parameters are meant to be a good representation of the human auditory perception. Predictive models are available to estimate the perception of these quantities. However, calculated psychoacoustic parameters show a lack of accuracy when compared with subjective listening test results for complex and authentic sounds. This paper shows some deficiencies and strengths of conventional algorithms and offers a few ideas for improvement.
传统心理声学评价工具、方法和算法的综述
目前,声音的心理声学分析常用于快速量化其听觉感知。这种与听觉相关的数量也被称为心理声学参数,旨在很好地代表人类的听觉感知。预测模型可用于估计对这些量的感知。然而,与主观听力测试结果相比,计算出的心理声学参数在复杂和真实的声音中缺乏准确性。本文分析了传统算法的不足和优点,并提出了一些改进思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信