KH. Faqih Maskumambang's Thought Regarding the Prohibition of the Use of Kentongan as a Marker of Prayer Time: A Prophetic Hadith Perspective

Aziz Miftahus Surur, Roibin Roibin, Umi Abidah, Aris Anwaril Muttaqin, Faridhotun Nisa’
{"title":"KH. Faqih Maskumambang's Thought Regarding the Prohibition of the Use of Kentongan as a Marker of Prayer Time: A Prophetic Hadith Perspective","authors":"Aziz Miftahus Surur, Roibin Roibin, Umi Abidah, Aris Anwaril Muttaqin, Faridhotun Nisa’","doi":"10.33367/tribakti.v34i2.3701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on the analysis of KH. Faqih Maskumambang's thoughts on the prohibition of using the Kentongan as a prayer time marker from the perspective of the prophet's hadith needs to be conducted. The aim is to describe the understanding of hadith in the classical and contemporary eras. Kentongan is a tool commonly used by some people as a sign of prayer. The use of this tool is a part of the characteristics of Islam in the archipelago. Along with the development of knowledge, traditions have drawn the attention of many circles. The main reason for criticism and refutation is because the use of these tools is considered an act of bid'ah and resembles non-Muslim worship. Even the founding figure of the NU and KH. Hasyim Asy'ari was among those who opposed traditions. In this study, the author used a descriptive-qualitative method with a contextual approach. The primary source used the book Sharh Hazzu al-Ru'us fi Radd al-Jasus 'an Tahrim al-Naqus by KH. Faqih Maskumambang. The result of this study is that, according to KH. Faqih Maskumambang, the hadith used as the basis for the prohibition of the use of the horn is not valid. In fact, another Hadith refutes Hadith, which is more valid. In explaining this, Kyai Faqih took explanations from the Qur'an and Hadith, which have similar topics of discussion. He also takes the opinions of scholars and the methods of fiqh and logic as reinforcements.","PeriodicalId":34623,"journal":{"name":"Tribakti Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tribakti Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v34i2.3701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on the analysis of KH. Faqih Maskumambang's thoughts on the prohibition of using the Kentongan as a prayer time marker from the perspective of the prophet's hadith needs to be conducted. The aim is to describe the understanding of hadith in the classical and contemporary eras. Kentongan is a tool commonly used by some people as a sign of prayer. The use of this tool is a part of the characteristics of Islam in the archipelago. Along with the development of knowledge, traditions have drawn the attention of many circles. The main reason for criticism and refutation is because the use of these tools is considered an act of bid'ah and resembles non-Muslim worship. Even the founding figure of the NU and KH. Hasyim Asy'ari was among those who opposed traditions. In this study, the author used a descriptive-qualitative method with a contextual approach. The primary source used the book Sharh Hazzu al-Ru'us fi Radd al-Jasus 'an Tahrim al-Naqus by KH. Faqih Maskumambang. The result of this study is that, according to KH. Faqih Maskumambang, the hadith used as the basis for the prohibition of the use of the horn is not valid. In fact, another Hadith refutes Hadith, which is more valid. In explaining this, Kyai Faqih took explanations from the Qur'an and Hadith, which have similar topics of discussion. He also takes the opinions of scholars and the methods of fiqh and logic as reinforcements.
KH。法齐赫·马库曼邦关于禁止使用Kentongan作为祈祷时间标记的思考:一个先知圣训的视角
KH分析研究。从先知圣训的角度,Faqih Maskumambang对禁止使用Kentongan作为祈祷时间标记的思考需要进行。目的是描述在古典和当代时代对圣训的理解。kentonan是一些人常用的一种工具,作为祈祷的标志。这种工具的使用是群岛伊斯兰教特征的一部分。随着知识的发展,传统已经引起了许多领域的关注。批评和反驳的主要原因是,这些工具的使用被认为是一种“bid'ah”行为,类似于非穆斯林的崇拜。甚至是NU和KH的创始人。Hasyim Asy'ari是反对传统的人之一。在本研究中,作者采用了描述-定性的方法与上下文的方法。主要资料来源是KH的《Sharh Hazzu al-Ru'us fi Radd al-Jasus 'an Tahrim al-Naqus》一书。人间蒸发Maskumambang。这项研究的结果是,根据KH。Faqih Maskumambang,作为禁止使用角的基础的圣训是无效的。事实上,另一个圣训反驳圣训,这是更有效的。在解释这一点时,Kyai Faqih从古兰经和圣训中得到了解释,它们有类似的讨论主题。他还以学者们的观点和法、逻辑的方法作为补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书