Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury: Single-Center Experience in a Developing Country

IF 0.2 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Nabil A Al-zoubi, Tagleb S. Mazahreh, Qusai Aljarrah, N. Shatnawi, S. Hamouri, E. Hijazi, Nizar R. Alwaqfi, Mamoon H Al-Omari, Mowafaq Heis
{"title":"Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury: Single-Center Experience in a Developing Country","authors":"Nabil A Al-zoubi, Tagleb S. Mazahreh, Qusai Aljarrah, N. Shatnawi, S. Hamouri, E. Hijazi, Nizar R. Alwaqfi, Mamoon H Al-Omari, Mowafaq Heis","doi":"10.30491/TM.2021.276341.1256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) is a lethal condition. The most common intervention is no longer open aortic repair (OAR), it has been almost entirely replaced by thoracic aortic endovascular repair (TEVAR). Objectives: In the present study, we aimed to share our experience in emergency TEVAR and address some difficulties that have been encountered. Methods: In this retrospective study, all patients with blunt chest trauma between July 2014 and April 2020 were identified. Only patients with BTAI who were treated by emergency TEVAR were included. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed. Results:A total of 657 cases of blunt chest trauma were identified. Only 7 cases were found to have BTAI who underwent emergency TEVAR; six patients (85.7%) were males, with a mean age (±SD) of 29.5±8.5 years and one as a 39-year-old female. Motor vehicle accident (MVA) was the mechanism of injury (100%). Two patients (27.6%) had grade-II, 4 patients (57.1%) had grade-III, and 1 patient (14.2%) had grade IV aortic injuries. Technical success was achieved in all cases (100%). No peri-procedural-related mortality and morbidity. No graft-related complications or re-interventions during the average follow-up of 23.3±8.6 months. Conclusions: Despite our lack of experience in OAR for BTAI, TEVAR has provided us with an alternative treatment option for this life-threatening condition. Considering the challenges that may be encountered in developing countries, our results were similar to what has been reported in the literature.","PeriodicalId":23249,"journal":{"name":"Trauma monthly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma monthly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30491/TM.2021.276341.1256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) is a lethal condition. The most common intervention is no longer open aortic repair (OAR), it has been almost entirely replaced by thoracic aortic endovascular repair (TEVAR). Objectives: In the present study, we aimed to share our experience in emergency TEVAR and address some difficulties that have been encountered. Methods: In this retrospective study, all patients with blunt chest trauma between July 2014 and April 2020 were identified. Only patients with BTAI who were treated by emergency TEVAR were included. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed. Results:A total of 657 cases of blunt chest trauma were identified. Only 7 cases were found to have BTAI who underwent emergency TEVAR; six patients (85.7%) were males, with a mean age (±SD) of 29.5±8.5 years and one as a 39-year-old female. Motor vehicle accident (MVA) was the mechanism of injury (100%). Two patients (27.6%) had grade-II, 4 patients (57.1%) had grade-III, and 1 patient (14.2%) had grade IV aortic injuries. Technical success was achieved in all cases (100%). No peri-procedural-related mortality and morbidity. No graft-related complications or re-interventions during the average follow-up of 23.3±8.6 months. Conclusions: Despite our lack of experience in OAR for BTAI, TEVAR has provided us with an alternative treatment option for this life-threatening condition. Considering the challenges that may be encountered in developing countries, our results were similar to what has been reported in the literature.
胸主动脉钝性损伤的血管内修复:发展中国家的单中心经验
背景:钝性胸主动脉损伤(BTAI)是一种致命疾病。最常见的干预不再是开放主动脉修复(OAR),它几乎完全被胸主动脉血管内修复(TEVAR)所取代。目的:在本研究中,我们旨在分享我们在紧急TEVAR中的经验,并解决遇到的一些困难。方法:回顾性分析2014年7月至2020年4月期间所有钝性胸外伤患者。仅纳入急诊TEVAR治疗的BTAI患者。收集和分析人口统计学和临床资料。结果:共鉴定出657例钝性胸外伤。经急诊TEVAR治疗后发现BTAI仅7例;男性6例(85.7%),平均年龄(±SD) 29.5±8.5岁,女性1例,39岁。机动车事故(MVA)是损伤机制(100%)。2例(27.6%)为ii级,4例(57.1%)为iii级,1例(14.2%)为IV级主动脉损伤。所有病例均取得了技术上的成功(100%)。无围手术期相关的死亡率和发病率。平均随访23.3±8.6个月,无移植物相关并发症及再干预。结论:尽管我们缺乏治疗BTAI的经验,TEVAR为这种危及生命的疾病提供了另一种治疗选择。考虑到发展中国家可能遇到的挑战,我们的结果与文献中报道的结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trauma monthly
Trauma monthly EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信