Principles of Stacktivism

IF 0.8 Q3 COMMUNICATION
G. Lovink
{"title":"Principles of Stacktivism","authors":"G. Lovink","doi":"10.31269/triplec.v18i2.1231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Those that define internet standards shape our thinking and hold the key to our freedom of communication — no trivial task. Yet tech policy is seen as boring: delegated to engineers, lawyers that represent corporations, research universities and ministries. In the now-past age of globalization internet governance and the machines that decide over regulations, protocols and the use of patents was outsourced to technocrats with a few ‘global civil society’ NGOs agitating on the margins. However, in this age of 5G and TikTok conflicts, driven by calls for ‘techno sovereignty’, there is no more consensus (and running code). In short, we demand protocols, not platforms.[1] But who’s going to get us there? Meet the stacktivists.[2]","PeriodicalId":45788,"journal":{"name":"TRIPLEC-Communication Capitalism & Critique","volume":"1 1","pages":"716-724"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TRIPLEC-Communication Capitalism & Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v18i2.1231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Those that define internet standards shape our thinking and hold the key to our freedom of communication — no trivial task. Yet tech policy is seen as boring: delegated to engineers, lawyers that represent corporations, research universities and ministries. In the now-past age of globalization internet governance and the machines that decide over regulations, protocols and the use of patents was outsourced to technocrats with a few ‘global civil society’ NGOs agitating on the margins. However, in this age of 5G and TikTok conflicts, driven by calls for ‘techno sovereignty’, there is no more consensus (and running code). In short, we demand protocols, not platforms.[1] But who’s going to get us there? Meet the stacktivists.[2]
堆叠主义原则
那些定义互联网标准的标准塑造了我们的思维,掌握着我们通信自由的关键——这不是一项微不足道的任务。然而,科技政策被认为是无聊的:被委派给工程师、代表企业的律师、研究型大学和部委。在过去的全球化时代,互联网治理和决定法规、协议和专利使用的机器被外包给技术官僚,少数“全球公民社会”非政府组织在边缘鼓动。然而,在这个5G和抖音冲突的时代,在“技术主权”的呼吁推动下,没有更多的共识(和运行代码)。简而言之,我们需要协议,而不是平台。[1]但谁能把我们送到那里呢?来见见堆栈主义者吧。[2]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
14
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信