Differences between official and non-official matches in worst-case scenarios in elite futsal players

IF 0.7 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
Konstantinos Spyrou, Tomás T. Freitas, E. Marín-Cascales, Rubén Herrero-Carrasco, P. Alcaraz
{"title":"Differences between official and non-official matches in worst-case scenarios in elite futsal players","authors":"Konstantinos Spyrou, Tomás T. Freitas, E. Marín-Cascales, Rubén Herrero-Carrasco, P. Alcaraz","doi":"10.29359/bjhpa.13.4.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: ‪This study aimed to compare the worst-case scenarios (WCS) between official (OFF) and non-official (Non-OFF) matches, in different time-periods in an elite futsal team. Material and methods: Twenty-six games were divided into OFF (n = 13) and Non-OFF (n = 13). The WCS were calculated using: two methods, rolling averages (ROLL) and fixed-periods (FIX); four-length epochs (30-s, 1-, 3-, and 5-min); and player load per minute (PL·min-1). Results: Considering ROLL, significant and small differences were found in PL·min-1, with higher intensity in 30-s (p = 0.001; ES = -0.53) and 1-min (p = 0.001; ES = -0.47) in OFF when compared to Non-OFF, but non-significant and small to trivial changes in 3-min (p = 0.060; ES = -0.23) and 5-min (p = 0.605; ES = -0.06) were observed. Regarding FIX, significant and small changes were obtained, with higher intensity in OFF in all time-periods when compared to Non-OFF. Significant differences were found between the two methods (ROLL vs FIX) in 30-s, 1- and 3-min, but not in 5-min. Significant differences, with lower PL·min-1, were observed with increasing time-windows from both methods (p = 0.001). Conclusions: ‪In summary, OFF matches present higher WCS than Non-OFF ones when considering short time-periods, and the FIX method could underestimate the “actual intensity” of the match compared to ROLL.","PeriodicalId":43798,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29359/bjhpa.13.4.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: ‪This study aimed to compare the worst-case scenarios (WCS) between official (OFF) and non-official (Non-OFF) matches, in different time-periods in an elite futsal team. Material and methods: Twenty-six games were divided into OFF (n = 13) and Non-OFF (n = 13). The WCS were calculated using: two methods, rolling averages (ROLL) and fixed-periods (FIX); four-length epochs (30-s, 1-, 3-, and 5-min); and player load per minute (PL·min-1). Results: Considering ROLL, significant and small differences were found in PL·min-1, with higher intensity in 30-s (p = 0.001; ES = -0.53) and 1-min (p = 0.001; ES = -0.47) in OFF when compared to Non-OFF, but non-significant and small to trivial changes in 3-min (p = 0.060; ES = -0.23) and 5-min (p = 0.605; ES = -0.06) were observed. Regarding FIX, significant and small changes were obtained, with higher intensity in OFF in all time-periods when compared to Non-OFF. Significant differences were found between the two methods (ROLL vs FIX) in 30-s, 1- and 3-min, but not in 5-min. Significant differences, with lower PL·min-1, were observed with increasing time-windows from both methods (p = 0.001). Conclusions: ‪In summary, OFF matches present higher WCS than Non-OFF ones when considering short time-periods, and the FIX method could underestimate the “actual intensity” of the match compared to ROLL.
精英五人制足球运动员最坏情况下官方与非官方比赛的差异
背景:本研究旨在比较官方(OFF)和非官方(Non-OFF)比赛在不同时间段内精英五人制球队的最坏情况(WCS)。材料与方法:将26个游戏分为OFF (n = 13)和Non-OFF (n = 13)两组。采用滚动平均(ROLL)和固定周期(FIX)两种方法计算WCS;四段时间(30-s, 1-, 3-, 5-min);和玩家每分钟加载(PL·min-1)。结果:考虑ROLL, PL·min-1的差异有统计学意义且较小,且在30 s时强度更高(p = 0.001;ES = -0.53)和1分钟(p = 0.001;与非OFF相比,OFF的ES = -0.47),但在3分钟内变化不显著且小到微不足道(p = 0.060;ES = -0.23)和5分钟(p = 0.605;ES = -0.06)。对于FIX,获得了显著而微小的变化,在所有时间段内,与Non-OFF相比,OFF的强度更高。两种方法(ROLL vs FIX)在30-s、1- min和3-min有显著差异,但在5-min无显著差异。随着时间窗的增加,两种方法观察到显著差异,PL·min-1较低(p = 0.001)。综上所述,在短时间内,OFF比赛的WCS高于Non-OFF比赛,而FIX方法与ROLL相比可能低估了比赛的“实际强度”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信