Reconstructing the Debt Restructuring Mechanism in the Indonesian Law on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations

IF 0.6 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Krista Yitawati, A. Sulistiyono, Pujiyono Pujiyono
{"title":"Reconstructing the Debt Restructuring Mechanism in the Indonesian Law on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations","authors":"Krista Yitawati, A. Sulistiyono, Pujiyono Pujiyono","doi":"10.37394/232032.2023.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (SDPO) is to prevent a debtor who is in trouble for whatever reason, lacks money, or finds it difficult to obtain credit, from being declared bankrupt. The current Indonesian Bankruptcy Law lacks a debt restructuring mechanism. There need to be improvements to ensure quality, transparency of objectivity and implementation mechanisms, honesty and legal certainty. This study aims to reconstruct the debt restructuring mechanism through the SDPO in the Indonesian Bankruptcy Law to provide legal certainty and benefit for all parties. This research has an Indonesian national scope. This is normative legal research that applies the statute and comparative approaches. Results show that Law Number 37 of 2004 still does not provide a legal framework for an effective corporate reorganization or debt restructuring. This law should be a system created to prepare agreements between creditors and debtors to negotiate based on an analysis of future events. Debtors often fail to postpone their obligation to pay debts not because the debtor did not submit a reconciliation plan, but because an agreement was not reached in the reconciliation process. As Law Number 37 of 2004 does not regulate the form of debt restructuring and company reorganization (including the payment process, payment period, and interest rate reduction) to save the debtor’s company, it is still difficult for the debtor’s company to pay off its debts.","PeriodicalId":54088,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Financial Engineering","volume":"187 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Financial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37394/232032.2023.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (SDPO) is to prevent a debtor who is in trouble for whatever reason, lacks money, or finds it difficult to obtain credit, from being declared bankrupt. The current Indonesian Bankruptcy Law lacks a debt restructuring mechanism. There need to be improvements to ensure quality, transparency of objectivity and implementation mechanisms, honesty and legal certainty. This study aims to reconstruct the debt restructuring mechanism through the SDPO in the Indonesian Bankruptcy Law to provide legal certainty and benefit for all parties. This research has an Indonesian national scope. This is normative legal research that applies the statute and comparative approaches. Results show that Law Number 37 of 2004 still does not provide a legal framework for an effective corporate reorganization or debt restructuring. This law should be a system created to prepare agreements between creditors and debtors to negotiate based on an analysis of future events. Debtors often fail to postpone their obligation to pay debts not because the debtor did not submit a reconciliation plan, but because an agreement was not reached in the reconciliation process. As Law Number 37 of 2004 does not regulate the form of debt restructuring and company reorganization (including the payment process, payment period, and interest rate reduction) to save the debtor’s company, it is still difficult for the debtor’s company to pay off its debts.
印尼破产与暂缓偿债法中的债务重组机制重构
暂停偿还债务的目的是为了防止因各种原因陷入困境、缺乏资金或难以获得信贷的债务人被宣布破产。目前的印尼破产法缺乏债务重组机制。需要改进,以确保质量、客观性和执行机制的透明度、诚实和法律确定性。本研究旨在通过印尼破产法中的SDPO重组债务重组机制,为各方提供法律确定性和利益。本研究具有印尼国家范围。这是运用成文法和比较法的规范性法律研究。结果表明,2004年第37号法律仍然没有为有效的公司重组或债务重组提供法律框架。这项法律应该是一种制度,为债权人和债务人之间准备协议,以便根据对未来事件的分析进行谈判。债务人往往不能推迟偿还债务的义务,不是因为债务人没有提交和解计划,而是因为在和解过程中没有达成协议。由于2004年第37号法没有对债务重组和公司重组的形式(包括支付流程、支付期限和降低利率)进行规范,以拯救债务人公司,因此债务人公司仍然难以偿还债务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信