The Educative Role of Social Reintegration Programs on Desistance from Crime

Laura-Julia Koblicska
{"title":"The Educative Role of Social Reintegration Programs on Desistance from Crime","authors":"Laura-Julia Koblicska","doi":"10.56177/red.7.2022.art.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social reintegration programs carried out within probation services are an important factor contributing to desistance from crime. A large number of people in the records of these services have the obligation to participate in at least one such program. It is known that the programs carried out by the probation officers have a significant educational component on the supervised persons, as they include many of the elements of an effective correctional treatment. It was also observed that delinquents participating in these programs develop thinking techniques that help them carefully evaluate the consequences of their own decisions and actions. The topic of this paper represents a real interest for probation practitioners, since the development of the supervision process, the preparation of educational reintegration programs in the activity of assistance and counselling, require interactions with the beneficiaries of the Probation Services. Therefore, the emergence of some situations may inherently present professional ethical dilemmas. ​​This paper highlights the need to explore and analyse the nature of these dilemmas, their frequency, the way counsellors manifest themselves in the face of an ethical ambiguity, the highlighting of optimal answers and reactions from a deontological and ethical point of view, and finally, the creation of some good practices. Although the chosen subject is an extremely challenging one, in this paper I will focus on the counsellor-beneficiary relationship, being aware of the multitude of issues that can be discussed with colleagues from different services. I will mention general aspects related to the notions of ethics, morals, and deontology in educational reintegration programs. I will also highlight certain relevant aspects in the Romanian legislation and in the European recommendations in the matter of probation. The present study was carried out at the national level, namely at the level of the Probation Services between 15.10.2022 and 14.11.2022. The research was built on the basis of the sociological survey method and as an investigation tool we used questionnaires. Which included both closed and open questions. Also, to obtain information, I used other techniques, such as the study of documents (probation files) and open-ended discussions. The data were collected by completing the questionnaires to the probation counsellors through remote communication means, and personally by colleagues from the Bistrița-Năsăud Probation Service. Thus, a number of 50 colleagues from most services in the country agreed to complete the questionnaire. In the last part of the paper, as a result of the research undertaken, I aimed to present the way in which we analyse and manage a variety of professional ethical dilemmas encountered in everyday practice. In addition, the relevant legislative benchmarks are discussed, optimized response strategies are presented, and finally the conclusions represent an opportunity for reflection and learning that can provide professionals with greater self-confidence, and a sense of safety and control over these situations.","PeriodicalId":31063,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advocacy Research and Education","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advocacy Research and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56177/red.7.2022.art.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social reintegration programs carried out within probation services are an important factor contributing to desistance from crime. A large number of people in the records of these services have the obligation to participate in at least one such program. It is known that the programs carried out by the probation officers have a significant educational component on the supervised persons, as they include many of the elements of an effective correctional treatment. It was also observed that delinquents participating in these programs develop thinking techniques that help them carefully evaluate the consequences of their own decisions and actions. The topic of this paper represents a real interest for probation practitioners, since the development of the supervision process, the preparation of educational reintegration programs in the activity of assistance and counselling, require interactions with the beneficiaries of the Probation Services. Therefore, the emergence of some situations may inherently present professional ethical dilemmas. ​​This paper highlights the need to explore and analyse the nature of these dilemmas, their frequency, the way counsellors manifest themselves in the face of an ethical ambiguity, the highlighting of optimal answers and reactions from a deontological and ethical point of view, and finally, the creation of some good practices. Although the chosen subject is an extremely challenging one, in this paper I will focus on the counsellor-beneficiary relationship, being aware of the multitude of issues that can be discussed with colleagues from different services. I will mention general aspects related to the notions of ethics, morals, and deontology in educational reintegration programs. I will also highlight certain relevant aspects in the Romanian legislation and in the European recommendations in the matter of probation. The present study was carried out at the national level, namely at the level of the Probation Services between 15.10.2022 and 14.11.2022. The research was built on the basis of the sociological survey method and as an investigation tool we used questionnaires. Which included both closed and open questions. Also, to obtain information, I used other techniques, such as the study of documents (probation files) and open-ended discussions. The data were collected by completing the questionnaires to the probation counsellors through remote communication means, and personally by colleagues from the Bistrița-Năsăud Probation Service. Thus, a number of 50 colleagues from most services in the country agreed to complete the questionnaire. In the last part of the paper, as a result of the research undertaken, I aimed to present the way in which we analyse and manage a variety of professional ethical dilemmas encountered in everyday practice. In addition, the relevant legislative benchmarks are discussed, optimized response strategies are presented, and finally the conclusions represent an opportunity for reflection and learning that can provide professionals with greater self-confidence, and a sense of safety and control over these situations.
社会重返社会项目对制止犯罪的教育作用
在缓刑服务范围内实施的重返社会方案是有助于制止犯罪的一个重要因素。这些服务的记录中有大量的人有义务参加至少一个这样的计划。众所周知,由缓刑官员执行的项目对被监督的人有重要的教育成分,因为它们包括许多有效的矫正治疗的要素。我们还观察到,参与这些项目的违法者发展了思维技巧,帮助他们仔细评估自己的决定和行为的后果。本文的主题代表了缓刑从业人员的真正兴趣,因为监督过程的发展,在援助和咨询活动中准备教育重返社会计划,需要与缓刑服务的受益者进行互动。因此,某些情况的出现可能固有地呈现出职业道德困境。本文强调需要探索和分析这些困境的本质,它们的频率,辅导员在面对道德模糊时表现自己的方式,从义务论和道德的角度突出最佳答案和反应,最后,创造一些良好的做法。虽然选择的主题是一个极具挑战性的,在本文中,我将重点关注咨询师-受益人关系,意识到可以与来自不同服务部门的同事讨论的众多问题。我将提到与伦理、道德和义务论概念有关的教育重返社会计划的一般方面。我还将强调罗马尼亚立法和欧洲关于缓刑问题的建议中的某些有关方面。本研究是在国家一级,即在2022年10月15日至2022年11月14日期间在缓刑服务一级进行的。本研究以社会学调查法为基础,采用问卷调查作为调查工具。包括封闭式和开放式问题。此外,为了获取信息,我还使用了其他技术,例如研究文件(试用文件)和开放式讨论。通过远程沟通方式向缓刑辅导员填写问卷,并由Bistrița-Năsăud缓刑服务中心的同事亲自收集数据。因此,来自该国大多数部门的50名同事同意填写调查表。在论文的最后一部分,作为研究的结果,我的目的是提出我们分析和管理日常实践中遇到的各种职业道德困境的方式。此外,还讨论了相关的立法基准,提出了优化的应对策略,最后得出的结论为专业人员提供了一个反思和学习的机会,可以让他们在这些情况下更有自信,更有安全感和控制感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信