Therapeutic use of alpha lipoic acid in burning mouth syndrome: A meta-analysis

Shubhabrata Roy, D. Raj, Jayanta Bhattacharyya, Samiran Das, Preeti Goel
{"title":"Therapeutic use of alpha lipoic acid in burning mouth syndrome: A meta-analysis","authors":"Shubhabrata Roy, D. Raj, Jayanta Bhattacharyya, Samiran Das, Preeti Goel","doi":"10.4103/sjos.sjoralsci_69_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic pain disorder of the oral cavity without any apparent local or systemic etiologic factor. There is no specific therapy for primary BMS and treatment is basically supportive or symptomatic. There are many pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches reported by different studies to alleviate pain in primary BMS. Alpha lipoic acid (ALA) has also been used as a therapeutic agent in BMS by many clinicians and researchers. Aims: The aim of this review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the double-blinded placebo controlled randomized clinical trials of ALA to determine its efficacy and potential as therapeutic agent in primary BMS. Six studies were selected for the systematic review after a thorough manual and electronic searching of the databases. Methods: Five out of the 6 selected studies were used for quantitative data synthesis. Results and discussion: The ALA therapy for 2 months provided symptomatic relief to more people in the study groups than in the placebo groups (risk ratio 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.71–3.19). The mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores of the test groups improved (decreased) after 2 months of ALA therapy (standardised mean difference [SMD] 0.72, 95% CI 0.20–1.24). When compared with placebo therapy, mean VAS scores improved (decreased) more with placebo than with ALA after 2 months of treatment (SMD −0.23, 95% CI: −0.70–0.24). The positive responders in the ALA groups presented less incidence of deterioration than the positive responders in placebo groups during the follow-up period. Conclusion: It was concluded from this meta-analysis that ALA could be used as a potential therapeutic agent in primary BMS. It should be administered in proper therapeutic doses and for sufficient time to elicit positive outcome. ALA can be used for a long time without any severe side effect and very few recipients complained about worsening of the situation. It certainly improves pain symptoms in a considerable number of patients when compared with placebo therapy.","PeriodicalId":32335,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"30 1","pages":"59 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjos.sjoralsci_69_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic pain disorder of the oral cavity without any apparent local or systemic etiologic factor. There is no specific therapy for primary BMS and treatment is basically supportive or symptomatic. There are many pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches reported by different studies to alleviate pain in primary BMS. Alpha lipoic acid (ALA) has also been used as a therapeutic agent in BMS by many clinicians and researchers. Aims: The aim of this review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the double-blinded placebo controlled randomized clinical trials of ALA to determine its efficacy and potential as therapeutic agent in primary BMS. Six studies were selected for the systematic review after a thorough manual and electronic searching of the databases. Methods: Five out of the 6 selected studies were used for quantitative data synthesis. Results and discussion: The ALA therapy for 2 months provided symptomatic relief to more people in the study groups than in the placebo groups (risk ratio 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.71–3.19). The mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores of the test groups improved (decreased) after 2 months of ALA therapy (standardised mean difference [SMD] 0.72, 95% CI 0.20–1.24). When compared with placebo therapy, mean VAS scores improved (decreased) more with placebo than with ALA after 2 months of treatment (SMD −0.23, 95% CI: −0.70–0.24). The positive responders in the ALA groups presented less incidence of deterioration than the positive responders in placebo groups during the follow-up period. Conclusion: It was concluded from this meta-analysis that ALA could be used as a potential therapeutic agent in primary BMS. It should be administered in proper therapeutic doses and for sufficient time to elicit positive outcome. ALA can be used for a long time without any severe side effect and very few recipients complained about worsening of the situation. It certainly improves pain symptoms in a considerable number of patients when compared with placebo therapy.
α硫辛酸治疗灼口综合征:荟萃分析
简介:原发性灼口综合征(BMS)是一种慢性口腔疼痛疾病,没有明显的局部或全身病因。对于原发性BMS没有特定的治疗方法,治疗基本上是支持性的或对症的。不同的研究报告了许多药物和非药物方法来减轻原发性BMS的疼痛。α硫辛酸(ALA)也被许多临床医生和研究人员用作BMS的治疗剂。目的:本综述和荟萃分析的目的是评估ALA的双盲安慰剂对照随机临床试验,以确定其作为原发性BMS治疗药物的疗效和潜力。在对数据库进行彻底的人工和电子检索后,选择了6项研究进行系统评价。方法:选取6项研究中的5项进行定量资料综合。结果和讨论:与安慰剂组相比,实验组中接受2个月ALA治疗的患者症状得到缓解的人数更多(风险比2.34,95%可信区间[CI]: 1.71-3.19)。ALA治疗2个月后,试验组的平均视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分改善(降低)(标准化平均差[SMD] 0.72, 95% CI 0.20-1.24)。与安慰剂治疗相比,治疗2个月后,安慰剂组的平均VAS评分比ALA组改善(降低)更多(SMD: - 0.23, 95% CI: - 0.70-0.24)。在随访期间,ALA组的阳性反应者出现的恶化发生率低于安慰剂组的阳性反应者。结论:本荟萃分析表明ALA可作为原发性BMS的潜在治疗药物。应给予适当的治疗剂量和足够的时间,以产生积极的结果。ALA可以长期使用,没有严重的副作用,很少有接受者抱怨情况恶化。与安慰剂疗法相比,它确实改善了相当一部分患者的疼痛症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信