COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL STRESS IN THE JOINT ZONE OF TOWER PIER UNDER DIFFERENT SYSTEMS OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE

Long Liu, Y. Bi
{"title":"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL STRESS IN THE JOINT ZONE OF TOWER PIER UNDER DIFFERENT SYSTEMS OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE","authors":"Long Liu, Y. Bi","doi":"10.14311/cej.2021.03.0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To explore the stress of the tower-beam-pier joint zone of a cable-stayed bridge under different systems, the submodel method in the finite element software ABAQUS was used to establish the local model of the tower-beam-pier joint zone of the bridge. At the same time, Midas/Civil was used to establish the rod system finite element model of the whole bridge. The correctness of the local model was verified by comparing the results of the finite element model and the local model. Then, by changing the combination mode of tower beam pier, the stress comparison analysis of the joint zone of the tower-beam-pier under different systems was carried out. The results showed the stress distribution of the semi-floating system was more reasonable than that of the rigid frame system and the consolidation system. In the use of the three different systems, there was concentrated tensile stress at the chamfer of the web and the bottom plate, where the steel bars should be added. In the rigid frame system, the deflection of the main beam under the load was the smallest, and the maximum displacement occurred at the boundary section, with the value of only 2.668mm.","PeriodicalId":21974,"journal":{"name":"Stavební obzor - Civil Engineering Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stavební obzor - Civil Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14311/cej.2021.03.0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To explore the stress of the tower-beam-pier joint zone of a cable-stayed bridge under different systems, the submodel method in the finite element software ABAQUS was used to establish the local model of the tower-beam-pier joint zone of the bridge. At the same time, Midas/Civil was used to establish the rod system finite element model of the whole bridge. The correctness of the local model was verified by comparing the results of the finite element model and the local model. Then, by changing the combination mode of tower beam pier, the stress comparison analysis of the joint zone of the tower-beam-pier under different systems was carried out. The results showed the stress distribution of the semi-floating system was more reasonable than that of the rigid frame system and the consolidation system. In the use of the three different systems, there was concentrated tensile stress at the chamfer of the web and the bottom plate, where the steel bars should be added. In the rigid frame system, the deflection of the main beam under the load was the smallest, and the maximum displacement occurred at the boundary section, with the value of only 2.668mm.
不同斜拉桥体系下塔墩接合区空间应力对比分析
为探讨不同体系下斜拉桥塔梁-墩节点区的受力情况,采用有限元软件ABAQUS中的子模型法建立了该桥塔梁-墩节点区的局部模型。同时利用Midas/Civil软件建立了全桥杆系有限元模型。通过比较有限元模型和局部模型的计算结果,验证了局部模型的正确性。然后,通过改变塔梁墩的组合方式,对不同体系下的塔梁墩接合区进行应力对比分析。结果表明:半浮式体系的应力分布比刚架体系和固结体系更为合理;在三种不同体系的使用中,腹板倒角和底板的拉应力集中,应在此添加钢筋。在刚架体系中,主梁在荷载作用下的挠度最小,最大位移发生在边界截面,仅为2.668mm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信