Trauma Outcomes in Methamphetamine-positive Patients vs Matched Methamphetamine-negative Controls in a Central Valley California Trauma Center

Jacob Kirkorowicz, N. Atherton, Yueqi Yan
{"title":"Trauma Outcomes in Methamphetamine-positive Patients vs Matched Methamphetamine-negative Controls in a Central Valley California Trauma Center","authors":"Jacob Kirkorowicz, N. Atherton, Yueqi Yan","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim and objective: Our objective was to determine whether patients presenting as activated traumas to a trauma center serving a high methamphetamine (meth) prevalence region differed in outcomes based on whether they tested positive vs negative for methamphetamine at the time of presentation. Materials and methods: A case-control design was used to examine the trauma outcomes among patients who tested meth-positive vs matched controls. The trauma outcomes evaluated were needed for laparotomy, rate of inpatient admission, rate of ICU admission, hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, ventilation status, ventilation time, injury severity score, and mortality. Propensity score matching was used to match meth-positive cases and comparison cases on sex, age (in years), race, primary financial resources to pay for the visit, presentation time, and the county where s/he lived at the time of presentation. Results: Meth-positive patients and matched comparison cases did not differ in the need for laparotomy. Meth-positive patients experienced a longer hospital stay ( p = 0.011), longer duration of ventilator use ( p = 0.05), and a higher injury severity score ( p < 0.001). Positive cases were more likely than matched comparison cases to be admitted to the ICU ( p < 0.001) and to be placed on mechanical ventilation ( p < 0.001). Meth- positive patients had a marginally significantly higher rate of inpatient admission ( p = 0.066). No significant difference was found between the two groups in mortality rate at discharge and length of ICU stays. Conclusion: Meth positivity is notably associated with an increased injury severity score on presentation. If meth use is known or suspected before arrival, trauma resources should be mobilized appropriately to prepare for a severe traumatic injury. The fact that meth positivity increases the likelihood of ICU admission and ventilator use, with increased hospital length of stay and increased ventilator time, indicates that meth positivity in trauma patients places a large burden on hospital staffing and resources.","PeriodicalId":74395,"journal":{"name":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim and objective: Our objective was to determine whether patients presenting as activated traumas to a trauma center serving a high methamphetamine (meth) prevalence region differed in outcomes based on whether they tested positive vs negative for methamphetamine at the time of presentation. Materials and methods: A case-control design was used to examine the trauma outcomes among patients who tested meth-positive vs matched controls. The trauma outcomes evaluated were needed for laparotomy, rate of inpatient admission, rate of ICU admission, hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, ventilation status, ventilation time, injury severity score, and mortality. Propensity score matching was used to match meth-positive cases and comparison cases on sex, age (in years), race, primary financial resources to pay for the visit, presentation time, and the county where s/he lived at the time of presentation. Results: Meth-positive patients and matched comparison cases did not differ in the need for laparotomy. Meth-positive patients experienced a longer hospital stay ( p = 0.011), longer duration of ventilator use ( p = 0.05), and a higher injury severity score ( p < 0.001). Positive cases were more likely than matched comparison cases to be admitted to the ICU ( p < 0.001) and to be placed on mechanical ventilation ( p < 0.001). Meth- positive patients had a marginally significantly higher rate of inpatient admission ( p = 0.066). No significant difference was found between the two groups in mortality rate at discharge and length of ICU stays. Conclusion: Meth positivity is notably associated with an increased injury severity score on presentation. If meth use is known or suspected before arrival, trauma resources should be mobilized appropriately to prepare for a severe traumatic injury. The fact that meth positivity increases the likelihood of ICU admission and ventilator use, with increased hospital length of stay and increased ventilator time, indicates that meth positivity in trauma patients places a large burden on hospital staffing and resources.
加利福尼亚中央山谷创伤中心甲基苯丙胺阳性患者与匹配的甲基苯丙胺阴性对照的创伤结局
目的和目的:我们的目的是确定在甲基苯丙胺(冰毒)高流行地区的创伤中心就诊的活动性创伤患者是否会因就诊时甲基苯丙胺检测呈阳性或阴性而产生不同的结果。材料和方法:采用病例对照设计来检查甲基苯丙胺阳性患者与匹配对照组的创伤结果。评估开腹手术、住院率、ICU住院率、住院时间、ICU住院时间、通气状态、通气时间、损伤严重程度评分和死亡率所需的创伤结局。使用倾向评分匹配方法对冰毒阳性病例和对照病例在性别、年龄(以年龄为单位)、种族、支付就诊费用的主要经济来源、就诊时间和就诊时居住的县等方面进行匹配。结果:甲基苯丙胺阳性患者和匹配的对照病例在剖腹手术的必要性上没有差异。甲基苯丙胺阳性患者住院时间较长(p = 0.011),呼吸机使用时间较长(p = 0.05),损伤严重程度评分较高(p < 0.001)。阳性病例比匹配对照病例更有可能入住ICU (p < 0.001),并接受机械通气(p < 0.001)。甲基苯丙胺阳性患者的住院率略高于对照组(p = 0.066)。两组患者出院死亡率和ICU住院时间差异无统计学意义。结论:甲基苯丙胺阳性与出现时损伤严重程度评分增加显著相关。如果在到达之前知道或怀疑使用冰毒,应适当调动创伤资源,为严重的创伤性损伤做好准备。冰毒阳性增加了ICU住院和使用呼吸机的可能性,增加了住院时间和呼吸机时间,这一事实表明,创伤患者的冰毒阳性给医院的人员配备和资源带来了很大的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信