Managing Complex Crises through the Lens of Intuitive Expertise: A Naturalistic Decision-Making Perspective

J. Okoli, A. Hatami-Marbini
{"title":"Managing Complex Crises through the Lens of Intuitive Expertise: A Naturalistic Decision-Making Perspective","authors":"J. Okoli, A. Hatami-Marbini","doi":"10.1177/028072702103900304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This theoretical paper draws extensively on the extant literature to examine the role of expert intuition in the management of non-routine crises within a volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) environment. It follows a theoretically driven inductive design to explore the construct of intuitive expertise, with a specific focus on high-risk domains. Methodically, the paper builds on the naturalistic decision-making (NDM) theory to explore how experienced crisis managers perform complex tasks with the aid of their tacit and intuitive knowledge. Evidence suggests that experienced decision-makers are more likely to solve time-pressured tasks using their intuitive mode as the default strategy, only switching to a deliberative mode when the proposed course(s) of action require some form of justification or where pattern recognition has proven insufficient. The paper also develops a four-dimensional framework that describes both individual and situational factors that generally influence decision-making dynamics in a VUCA crisis environment. A synthesis of the literature results in the emergence of four theoretical propositions, with implications discussed for crisis and emergency practice. A key recommendation is to integrate the NDM sub-discipline into the field of crisis management, with suggestions that such integration may lead to significant improvements in crisis response effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":84928,"journal":{"name":"International journal of mass emergencies and disasters","volume":"49 1","pages":"394 - 416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of mass emergencies and disasters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/028072702103900304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This theoretical paper draws extensively on the extant literature to examine the role of expert intuition in the management of non-routine crises within a volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) environment. It follows a theoretically driven inductive design to explore the construct of intuitive expertise, with a specific focus on high-risk domains. Methodically, the paper builds on the naturalistic decision-making (NDM) theory to explore how experienced crisis managers perform complex tasks with the aid of their tacit and intuitive knowledge. Evidence suggests that experienced decision-makers are more likely to solve time-pressured tasks using their intuitive mode as the default strategy, only switching to a deliberative mode when the proposed course(s) of action require some form of justification or where pattern recognition has proven insufficient. The paper also develops a four-dimensional framework that describes both individual and situational factors that generally influence decision-making dynamics in a VUCA crisis environment. A synthesis of the literature results in the emergence of four theoretical propositions, with implications discussed for crisis and emergency practice. A key recommendation is to integrate the NDM sub-discipline into the field of crisis management, with suggestions that such integration may lead to significant improvements in crisis response effectiveness.
通过直觉专业知识的镜头管理复杂的危机:一个自然主义的决策视角
这篇理论论文广泛借鉴了现有文献,以研究专家直觉在不稳定、不确定、复杂和模糊(VUCA)环境中管理非常规危机中的作用。它遵循理论驱动的归纳设计来探索直觉专业知识的构建,特别关注高风险领域。系统地,本文建立在自然决策(NDM)理论的基础上,探讨经验丰富的危机管理者如何借助他们的隐性和直觉知识来执行复杂的任务。有证据表明,经验丰富的决策者更有可能将他们的直觉模式作为默认策略来解决时间紧迫的任务,只有当提议的行动过程需要某种形式的理由或模式识别被证明不足时,才会切换到审议模式。本文还开发了一个四维框架,描述了在VUCA危机环境中通常影响决策动态的个人和情境因素。综合文献产生了四个理论命题,并讨论了对危机和应急实践的影响。一项关键建议是将国家发展机制的子学科纳入危机管理领域,并建议这种整合可能会显著提高危机应对的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信