Pizza and Poop: Using Playful Probes to Investigate Community in Semi-Public Restrooms on a University Campus

E. Sanders, N. Murteza, M. Sabatelli
{"title":"Pizza and Poop: Using Playful Probes to Investigate Community in Semi-Public Restrooms on a University Campus","authors":"E. Sanders, N. Murteza, M. Sabatelli","doi":"10.3390/architecture2010006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This exploratory paper aims to discuss how community is fostered in semi-public restrooms on a college campus. While previous research has been undertaken in similar semi-private environments, this paper differs by simultaneously offering the researchers’ reflective insights in tandem with participants’ input on the research question. We begin by unpacking the challenges around Participatory Design (PD) activities that are undertaken in sensitive and private interior environments. Gathering perceptions of these sensitive spaces required methods that allowed for both anonymity and a communal approach through the use of provocative and evocative probes such as comment boxes and graffiti wall posters. This paper not only catalogues the findings of this research but also documents the difficulties in utilizing a participant-led approach, gaining access to sites and participants, and countering our own biases throughout the study’s construction. Through researcher accounts and participatory data analysis, the researchers offer a focused reflection on a possible new frontier for advancing PD methods in sensitive environments through playful probes. The contribution of this paper offers six lessons on the efficacy of using probes in semi-private environments, with playfulness as a primary driver of engaging participants.","PeriodicalId":79561,"journal":{"name":"Architecture (Washington, D.C.)","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture2010006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This exploratory paper aims to discuss how community is fostered in semi-public restrooms on a college campus. While previous research has been undertaken in similar semi-private environments, this paper differs by simultaneously offering the researchers’ reflective insights in tandem with participants’ input on the research question. We begin by unpacking the challenges around Participatory Design (PD) activities that are undertaken in sensitive and private interior environments. Gathering perceptions of these sensitive spaces required methods that allowed for both anonymity and a communal approach through the use of provocative and evocative probes such as comment boxes and graffiti wall posters. This paper not only catalogues the findings of this research but also documents the difficulties in utilizing a participant-led approach, gaining access to sites and participants, and countering our own biases throughout the study’s construction. Through researcher accounts and participatory data analysis, the researchers offer a focused reflection on a possible new frontier for advancing PD methods in sensitive environments through playful probes. The contribution of this paper offers six lessons on the efficacy of using probes in semi-private environments, with playfulness as a primary driver of engaging participants.
披萨和便便:用好玩的探针调查大学校园半公共厕所里的社区
这篇探索性论文旨在探讨如何在大学校园的半公共厕所中培养社区。虽然以前的研究是在类似的半私人环境中进行的,但本文的不同之处在于,它同时提供了研究人员与参与者对研究问题的输入相结合的反思见解。我们首先揭示了在敏感和私人室内环境中进行的参与式设计(PD)活动所面临的挑战。收集这些敏感空间的感知需要通过使用煽动性和唤起性的探针(如评论框和涂鸦墙海报)来允许匿名和公共方法。本文不仅对本研究的发现进行了分类,而且还记录了在利用参与者主导的方法、获取网站和参与者的访问权限以及在整个研究构建过程中克服我们自己的偏见方面的困难。通过研究人员的描述和参与式数据分析,研究人员通过有趣的探针,为在敏感环境中推进PD方法提供了一个可能的新前沿。本文的贡献提供了关于在半私密环境中使用探针的有效性的六个经验教训,其中玩乐是吸引参与者的主要驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信