Job role and stress influence student movement during postpartum haemorrhage simulation: an exploratory study.

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning Pub Date : 2020-11-13 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000646
Rachel Bican, Jill C Heathcock, Flora Jedryszek, Veronique Debarge, Julien DeJonckheere, M C Cybalski, Sandy Hanssens
{"title":"Job role and stress influence student movement during postpartum haemorrhage simulation: an exploratory study.","authors":"Rachel Bican, Jill C Heathcock, Flora Jedryszek, Veronique Debarge, Julien DeJonckheere, M C Cybalski, Sandy Hanssens","doi":"10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postpartum haemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal death. Healthcare simulations are an educational tool to prepare students for infrequent high-risk emergencies without risking patient safety. Efficiency of movement in the simulation environment is important to minimize the risk of medical error. The purpose of this study was to quantify the movement behaviours of the participants in the simulation and evaluate the relationship between perceived stress and movement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>N=30 students participated in 10 high-fidelity medical simulations using an adult patient simulator experiencing a postpartum haemorrhage. The participants completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory prior to the simulation to measure perceived stress. Physical movement behaviours included walking around the simulation, time spent at bedside, arm movements, movements without purpose, looking at charts/vitals and total movement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Midwife (MW) students spent significantly more time walking (p=0.004) and looking at charts/vitals (p=<0.001) and significantly less time at bedside (p=<0.001) compared to obstetric (OB) students. The MW students demonstrated significantly more total movements compared to the OB students (p=<0.001). There was a significant, moderate, positive relationship between perceived stress and total movement during the simulation for the MW group (r=0.50, p=0.05). There was a trend for a moderate, positive relationship between perceived stress and total movement during the simulation for the OB group (r=0.46, p=0.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physical movement during a simulation varies by job role and is influenced by perceived stress. Improved understanding of physical movement in the simulation environment can improve feedback, training and environmental set-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Postpartum haemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal death. Healthcare simulations are an educational tool to prepare students for infrequent high-risk emergencies without risking patient safety. Efficiency of movement in the simulation environment is important to minimize the risk of medical error. The purpose of this study was to quantify the movement behaviours of the participants in the simulation and evaluate the relationship between perceived stress and movement.

Methods: N=30 students participated in 10 high-fidelity medical simulations using an adult patient simulator experiencing a postpartum haemorrhage. The participants completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory prior to the simulation to measure perceived stress. Physical movement behaviours included walking around the simulation, time spent at bedside, arm movements, movements without purpose, looking at charts/vitals and total movement.

Results: Midwife (MW) students spent significantly more time walking (p=0.004) and looking at charts/vitals (p=<0.001) and significantly less time at bedside (p=<0.001) compared to obstetric (OB) students. The MW students demonstrated significantly more total movements compared to the OB students (p=<0.001). There was a significant, moderate, positive relationship between perceived stress and total movement during the simulation for the MW group (r=0.50, p=0.05). There was a trend for a moderate, positive relationship between perceived stress and total movement during the simulation for the OB group (r=0.46, p=0.10).

Conclusions: Physical movement during a simulation varies by job role and is influenced by perceived stress. Improved understanding of physical movement in the simulation environment can improve feedback, training and environmental set-up.

工作角色和压力对模拟产后大出血过程中学生动作的影响:一项探索性研究。
引言产后大出血是产妇死亡的主要原因。医疗模拟是一种教育工具,可在不危及患者安全的情况下,让学生为不常见的高风险紧急情况做好准备。模拟环境中的移动效率对于最大限度地降低医疗失误风险非常重要。本研究的目的是量化参与者在模拟环境中的动作行为,并评估感知压力与动作之间的关系:方法:30 名学生参加了 10 次高保真医疗模拟,使用的是成人患者产后大出血模拟人。参与者在模拟前填写了状态-特质焦虑量表,以测量感知压力。身体运动行为包括在模拟环境中走动、在床边停留的时间、手臂运动、无目的运动、查看病历/生命体征和总运动:结果:助产士(MW)学生花在走路(p=0.004)和看病历/病历(p=0.004)上的时间明显较多:模拟过程中的身体运动因工作角色而异,并受感知压力的影响。更好地了解模拟环境中的身体运动可以改善反馈、培训和环境设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信