Preface by Editor-in-Chief

IF 0.4 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
I. Baranauskienė
{"title":"Preface by Editor-in-Chief","authors":"I. Baranauskienė","doi":"10.21277/sw.v1i10.568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear authors, members of the editorial board, and readers of the scientific interdisciplinary journal Social Welfare: Interdisciplinary Approach. We present to you one more issue of the journal. As in previous issues, in the present issue, an interdisciplinary approach to social welfare in a national and intercultural context is important to us. In this issue, we present to your attention the works of scientists from three countries in one way or another related to social welfare, the concept of which is constructed and presented in three chapters: Social Challenges, The Development of Professional Competences and Disability Studies. Going deeper into the presented scientific works, it can be seen that in many of them we can name social justice as the main idea. This scientific concept and the starting point of the formation of the concept of life has reached us from ancient times. All of us know Plato, Socrates’ disciple, and his ontological concept of justice related to a virtue of the soul. Justice for Plato is one of the major virtues that encompasses both state governance and human life in general. It can be argued that he saw the benefits of justice in the life of the state and the individual, including the idea that justice unites society (Plato, 2000[1]). Aristotle gives justice the meaning of redistribution and sharing. On the other hand, although Aristotle’s justice is restricted to Greek citizens, in any case, the idea of sharing, redistributing, offsetting was spread thanks to Aristotle (Aristotle, 1990[2]). Thomas Aquinas not only linked the Christian tradition to the teaching of Aristotle, but also further developed the idea of justice and emphasized the importance of transposing the idea into law (Aquinas, 2015[3]). Immanuel Kant developed a moral theory which, in the context of our days, is, in my view, an important duty as the strongest pillar of morality (Kant, 1987[4]). Without going into polemic about how much Immanuel Kant’s philosophy influenced John Rawls’ theory of social justice, I will quote the principles of justice defined by him: “a) each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive scheme of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar scheme of liberties for others; and in this scheme the equal political liberties, and only those liberties, are to be guaranteed their fair value. b) Social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both: (a) to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged, consistent with the just savings principle, and (b) attached to offices and positions open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity” (Rawls, 2002, p. 61[5]). It can be said that Rawls’ idea that we will not achieve social welfare in the state until justice, including social justice, is ensured, has laid the foundations for a modern understanding of social justice. The dialectic of the concept of justice is also reflected in the works of our authors as the emphasis on justice as a value (Arūnas Acus, Liutauras Kraniauskas; Ilona Dobrovolskytė), the disclosure of the meaning of sharing (Jurgita Lenkauskaitė; Olga Kuprieieva, Tetiana Traverse, Liudmyla Serdiuk, Olena Chykhantsova, Oleksandr Shamych), the construct of the concept of law (Daiva Malinauskienė, Aistė Igorytė; Ingrida Baranauskienė, Alla Kovalenko, Inna Leonova), the understanding of a theory of civic morality, a duty that is a pillar of morality (Svitlana Kravchuk; Elena Kuftyak; Asta Volbikienė, Remigijus Bubnys; Simas Garbenis, Renata Geležinienė, Greta Šiaučiulytė). And it does not matter at all whether this is analyzed in the context of social challenges, disability studies or professional competences. It can be stated that the idea of social justice is the driving force behind the scientific works of this journal.Wishing everyone to stay healthy, both physically and spiritually, I place social justice as a fundamental value in these turbulent times of a global pandemic. But life does not stand still, so we look forward to your new research works. There will be no us without you.","PeriodicalId":41093,"journal":{"name":"Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21277/sw.v1i10.568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dear authors, members of the editorial board, and readers of the scientific interdisciplinary journal Social Welfare: Interdisciplinary Approach. We present to you one more issue of the journal. As in previous issues, in the present issue, an interdisciplinary approach to social welfare in a national and intercultural context is important to us. In this issue, we present to your attention the works of scientists from three countries in one way or another related to social welfare, the concept of which is constructed and presented in three chapters: Social Challenges, The Development of Professional Competences and Disability Studies. Going deeper into the presented scientific works, it can be seen that in many of them we can name social justice as the main idea. This scientific concept and the starting point of the formation of the concept of life has reached us from ancient times. All of us know Plato, Socrates’ disciple, and his ontological concept of justice related to a virtue of the soul. Justice for Plato is one of the major virtues that encompasses both state governance and human life in general. It can be argued that he saw the benefits of justice in the life of the state and the individual, including the idea that justice unites society (Plato, 2000[1]). Aristotle gives justice the meaning of redistribution and sharing. On the other hand, although Aristotle’s justice is restricted to Greek citizens, in any case, the idea of sharing, redistributing, offsetting was spread thanks to Aristotle (Aristotle, 1990[2]). Thomas Aquinas not only linked the Christian tradition to the teaching of Aristotle, but also further developed the idea of justice and emphasized the importance of transposing the idea into law (Aquinas, 2015[3]). Immanuel Kant developed a moral theory which, in the context of our days, is, in my view, an important duty as the strongest pillar of morality (Kant, 1987[4]). Without going into polemic about how much Immanuel Kant’s philosophy influenced John Rawls’ theory of social justice, I will quote the principles of justice defined by him: “a) each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive scheme of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar scheme of liberties for others; and in this scheme the equal political liberties, and only those liberties, are to be guaranteed their fair value. b) Social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both: (a) to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged, consistent with the just savings principle, and (b) attached to offices and positions open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity” (Rawls, 2002, p. 61[5]). It can be said that Rawls’ idea that we will not achieve social welfare in the state until justice, including social justice, is ensured, has laid the foundations for a modern understanding of social justice. The dialectic of the concept of justice is also reflected in the works of our authors as the emphasis on justice as a value (Arūnas Acus, Liutauras Kraniauskas; Ilona Dobrovolskytė), the disclosure of the meaning of sharing (Jurgita Lenkauskaitė; Olga Kuprieieva, Tetiana Traverse, Liudmyla Serdiuk, Olena Chykhantsova, Oleksandr Shamych), the construct of the concept of law (Daiva Malinauskienė, Aistė Igorytė; Ingrida Baranauskienė, Alla Kovalenko, Inna Leonova), the understanding of a theory of civic morality, a duty that is a pillar of morality (Svitlana Kravchuk; Elena Kuftyak; Asta Volbikienė, Remigijus Bubnys; Simas Garbenis, Renata Geležinienė, Greta Šiaučiulytė). And it does not matter at all whether this is analyzed in the context of social challenges, disability studies or professional competences. It can be stated that the idea of social justice is the driving force behind the scientific works of this journal.Wishing everyone to stay healthy, both physically and spiritually, I place social justice as a fundamental value in these turbulent times of a global pandemic. But life does not stand still, so we look forward to your new research works. There will be no us without you.
总编辑序
亲爱的《社会福利:跨学科方法》杂志的作者、编委会成员和读者们。我们再向您展示一期杂志。与前几期一样,在本期中,在国家和文化背景下对社会福利采取跨学科的方法对我们很重要。本期,我们将向您介绍来自三个国家的科学家在社会福利方面的工作,这些工作以不同的方式与社会福利有关,社会福利的概念被构建并呈现在三个章节中:社会挑战、专业能力的发展和残疾研究。深入研究所呈现的科学作品,可以看出,在其中许多作品中,我们可以将社会正义作为主要思想。这种科学观和生命观念形成的起点,从远古时代就已到达我们身边。我们都知道苏格拉底的弟子柏拉图,以及他关于正义的本体论概念与灵魂的美德有关。对柏拉图来说,正义是一种主要的美德,涵盖了国家治理和一般的人类生活。可以说,他在国家和个人的生活中看到了正义的好处,包括正义团结社会的观点(柏拉图,2000[1])。亚里士多德赋予正义再分配和分享的意义。另一方面,虽然亚里士多德的正义只局限于希腊公民,但无论如何,分享、再分配、抵消的理念因为亚里士多德而得以传播(亚里士多德,1990[2])。托马斯·阿奎那不仅将基督教传统与亚里士多德的教导联系起来,而且进一步发展了正义观念,并强调了将正义观念转化为法律的重要性(阿奎那,2015[3])。伊曼努尔·康德发展了一种道德理论,在我们这个时代的背景下,在我看来,这是作为道德最强大支柱的重要责任(康德,1987年[4])。在不讨论康德哲学对罗尔斯社会正义理论的影响的情况下,我将引用他所定义的正义原则:“a)每个人都有平等的权利享有最广泛的平等基本自由与他人的类似自由相适应;在这个方案中,平等的政治自由,也只有这些自由,才能保证它们的公平价值。b)社会和经济不平等的安排,使它们都:(a)最弱势群体的最大利益,符合公正储蓄原则,(b)在公平的机会平等的条件下,附属于对所有人开放的职位和职位”(罗尔斯,2002,p. 61[5])。可以说,罗尔斯关于只有确保了包括社会正义在内的正义,我们才能在国家中实现社会福利的思想,为现代社会正义的理解奠定了基础。正义观念的辩证性也体现在我国作家的作品中,表现为对正义作为一种价值的强调(Arūnas Acus, Liutauras Kraniauskas;伊洛娜·多布罗沃斯基特(Ilona dobrovolsky),分享的意义的揭示(Jurgita lenkauskaitje;Olga kupriieeva, Tetiana Traverse, Liudmyla Serdiuk, Olena Chykhantsova, Oleksandr Shamych),法律概念的构建(Daiva malinauskien立陶宛,aisst立陶宛igoryt立陶宛;Ingrida baranauskienvila, Alla Kovalenko, Inna Leonova),对公民道德理论的理解,责任是道德的支柱(Svitlana Kravchuk;埃琳娜Kuftyak;Asta volbikienvili, Remigijus Bubnys;Simas Garbenis, Renata Geležinienė, Greta Šiaučiulytė)。无论这是在社会挑战、残疾研究还是专业能力的背景下分析的,都无关紧要。可以说,社会正义的理念是本刊科学工作背后的驱动力。我希望每个人在身体和精神上都保持健康,在全球大流行的动荡时期,我将社会正义作为一项基本价值。但生活不会停滞不前,所以我们期待你新的研究作品。没有你就没有我们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信