Avian guild structure and habitat associations in suburban bird communities

Richard M. DeGraaf , James M. Wentworth
{"title":"Avian guild structure and habitat associations in suburban bird communities","authors":"Richard M. DeGraaf ,&nbsp;James M. Wentworth","doi":"10.1016/0304-4009(86)90012-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Breeding bird communities were compared in three suburbs: a 70-year-old area of larhe houses along streets shaded by mature trees (MT), primarily oaks (<em>Quercus</em>) and elms (<em>Ulmus</em>); a 15-year-old area built upon open agricultural land with young maple (<em>Acer</em>) street trees (YT); and a 15-year-old area on which houses were built in small clearings within a second-growth oak-pine (<em>Quercus-Pinus</em>) woodland (OP). Bird censuses each year for 5 years revealed that YT supported the lowest total avian density of the three suburbs; OP supported the greatest variety and total density of insectivores, and the lowest number of ground-gleaning omnivores; and MT supported the highest total avian density, comprised primarily of ground-foraging seed eaters and omnivores. Among nesting guilds, OP contained the fewest ground/herb nesters, and MT the most. Also, OP had the fewest shrub nesters, and MT the most. Tree cavity and twig nesters were significantly more numerous in OP, and tree branch nesters fewer in YT than in either OP or MT. Analyses of habitat structure revealed that shrub maturity is more important than numbers of shrubs, and that planted trees, no matter how mature or abundant, do not replace natural forest stands as habitat for most insectivorous species.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101265,"journal":{"name":"Urban Ecology","volume":"9 3","pages":"Pages 399-412"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-4009(86)90012-4","citationCount":"106","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304400986900124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 106

Abstract

Breeding bird communities were compared in three suburbs: a 70-year-old area of larhe houses along streets shaded by mature trees (MT), primarily oaks (Quercus) and elms (Ulmus); a 15-year-old area built upon open agricultural land with young maple (Acer) street trees (YT); and a 15-year-old area on which houses were built in small clearings within a second-growth oak-pine (Quercus-Pinus) woodland (OP). Bird censuses each year for 5 years revealed that YT supported the lowest total avian density of the three suburbs; OP supported the greatest variety and total density of insectivores, and the lowest number of ground-gleaning omnivores; and MT supported the highest total avian density, comprised primarily of ground-foraging seed eaters and omnivores. Among nesting guilds, OP contained the fewest ground/herb nesters, and MT the most. Also, OP had the fewest shrub nesters, and MT the most. Tree cavity and twig nesters were significantly more numerous in OP, and tree branch nesters fewer in YT than in either OP or MT. Analyses of habitat structure revealed that shrub maturity is more important than numbers of shrubs, and that planted trees, no matter how mature or abundant, do not replace natural forest stands as habitat for most insectivorous species.

郊区鸟类群落的鸟类行会结构与栖息地关联
在三个郊区比较了繁殖鸟类群落:一个有70年历史的大型房屋区域,沿着被成熟树木(MT)遮蔽的街道,主要是橡树(栎)和榆树(榆);一个15年的区域,建在开放的农业用地上,有年轻的枫树(槭)行道树(YT);还有一个15年的区域,房屋建在次生型橡树松林(OP)的小空地上。每年5年的鸟类普查结果表明,YT是3个郊区鸟类总密度最低的;OP支持食虫动物种类和总密度最大,杂食动物数量最少;MT支持最高的鸟类总密度,主要由地面觅食的食籽动物和杂食动物组成。在筑巢行会中,OP拥有最少的地面/药草筑巢者,MT拥有最多。此外,OP的灌木筑巢者最少,MT的最多。与OP和MT相比,OP的树腔巢和树枝巢数量显著增加,而YT的树枝巢数量明显减少。栖息地结构分析表明,灌木成熟度比灌木数量更重要,而且人工种植的树木无论多成熟或多丰富,都不能取代天然林分作为大多数食虫物种的栖息地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信