Direct-to-Consumer Testing: The Business With Lifestyle Tests

M. Orth
{"title":"Direct-to-Consumer Testing: The Business With Lifestyle Tests","authors":"M. Orth","doi":"10.1097/POC.0000000000000144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Medical treatment by a physician consists of diagnosing the disease of a patient and choosing the right treatment for the disease. In most cases, medical diagnosing uses laboratory testing, and in most countries, laboratory testing is regarded as an integral part of health care. Certain country-specific regulations even restrict the access only to physicians such as for the test kits or prohibit to addressing the patient directly with the laboratory report. The idea behind these regulations originates from patient safety issues with the special situation in health care with, for example, the asymmetric situation between highly trained health care professionals and the medically illiterate patient who needs a particular protection such as by sophisticated legal restrictions. Direct-to-consumer testing (DTCT) challenges these restrictions. The idea behind DTCT is the direct access of the “consumer” (the former “patient”) to medical test results and the concept to self-empower the “consumer” (with the concept of “4P-medicine”). In many cases, Internet technologies are used both to offer convenience to the “consumer” and to circumvent national legal restrictions in health care. Without doubt, some DTCT such as glucose self-testing are medically necessary and beneficial for the patients. However, in many other cases, DTCTs are even a severe threat to patients’ safety and aimed to maximize the profits of the vendors only. A particular challenge is the nearly unlimited number of tests available and the blurred nonmedical interpretation of the DCTC laboratory tests performed.","PeriodicalId":20262,"journal":{"name":"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology","volume":"83 1","pages":"124–127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Medical treatment by a physician consists of diagnosing the disease of a patient and choosing the right treatment for the disease. In most cases, medical diagnosing uses laboratory testing, and in most countries, laboratory testing is regarded as an integral part of health care. Certain country-specific regulations even restrict the access only to physicians such as for the test kits or prohibit to addressing the patient directly with the laboratory report. The idea behind these regulations originates from patient safety issues with the special situation in health care with, for example, the asymmetric situation between highly trained health care professionals and the medically illiterate patient who needs a particular protection such as by sophisticated legal restrictions. Direct-to-consumer testing (DTCT) challenges these restrictions. The idea behind DTCT is the direct access of the “consumer” (the former “patient”) to medical test results and the concept to self-empower the “consumer” (with the concept of “4P-medicine”). In many cases, Internet technologies are used both to offer convenience to the “consumer” and to circumvent national legal restrictions in health care. Without doubt, some DTCT such as glucose self-testing are medically necessary and beneficial for the patients. However, in many other cases, DTCTs are even a severe threat to patients’ safety and aimed to maximize the profits of the vendors only. A particular challenge is the nearly unlimited number of tests available and the blurred nonmedical interpretation of the DCTC laboratory tests performed.
直接面向消费者的测试:生活方式测试的业务
医生的医疗包括诊断病人的疾病和选择正确的治疗方法。在大多数情况下,医学诊断使用实验室检测,在大多数国家,实验室检测被视为卫生保健的一个组成部分。某些国家的特定法规甚至限制仅向医生提供检测试剂盒,或禁止在实验室报告中直接向患者发表意见。这些条例背后的想法源于医疗保健领域特殊情况下的患者安全问题,例如,训练有素的医疗保健专业人员与医学文盲患者之间的不对称情况,他们需要通过复杂的法律限制等特殊保护。直接面向消费者的测试(DTCT)挑战了这些限制。DTCT背后的理念是“消费者”(以前的“病人”)直接获得医学测试结果和“消费者”自我授权的概念(“4p医学”的概念)。在许多情况下,互联网技术既被用来为"消费者"提供便利,又被用来规避卫生保健方面的国家法律限制。毫无疑问,一些DTCT如葡萄糖自测在医学上是必要的,对患者是有益的。然而,在许多其他情况下,dtc甚至对患者的安全构成严重威胁,其目的只是为了使供应商的利润最大化。一个特别的挑战是,可用的检测几乎是无限的,而且对DCTC实验室进行的检测的非医学解释模糊不清。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信