Comparison study of the agricultural subsidy policy applied by Ecuador and Hungary in the last 10 years

Ordonez Maria Lourdes, K. Kovács
{"title":"Comparison study of the agricultural subsidy policy applied by Ecuador and Hungary in the last 10 years","authors":"Ordonez Maria Lourdes, K. Kovács","doi":"10.19041/apstract/2022/1/9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agricultural subsidies have long been a consistent concern of government policies; they influence the use of resources for pursuing different goals in this sector. In this research, we are making a comparison study of the agricultural subsidy policies of Ecuador and Hungary in the last ten years by a comparative analysis applied for empirical generalization to explain and get a better understanding of the subsidies used in the two countries. The results show an enormous advantage for Hungary compared to Ecuador regarding the agricultural subsidies. Since they are part of the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union, Hungary's subsidies are institutionalized and planned in the long term within a series of programs financed by the EU and national funds. While in Ecuador, agricultural policies exist as a general framework, and the governing body manages the subsidies through programs and projects that do not remain over time and depend on the current political situation in the country. In the same way, the data collected reflects that although the share of the agricultural sector in Ecuador's GDP is higher than in Hungary, the subsidy amounts for this sector are 36% lower than in Hungary.\n \nJEL CODE: Q13","PeriodicalId":32569,"journal":{"name":"Apstract Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apstract Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19041/apstract/2022/1/9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural subsidies have long been a consistent concern of government policies; they influence the use of resources for pursuing different goals in this sector. In this research, we are making a comparison study of the agricultural subsidy policies of Ecuador and Hungary in the last ten years by a comparative analysis applied for empirical generalization to explain and get a better understanding of the subsidies used in the two countries. The results show an enormous advantage for Hungary compared to Ecuador regarding the agricultural subsidies. Since they are part of the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union, Hungary's subsidies are institutionalized and planned in the long term within a series of programs financed by the EU and national funds. While in Ecuador, agricultural policies exist as a general framework, and the governing body manages the subsidies through programs and projects that do not remain over time and depend on the current political situation in the country. In the same way, the data collected reflects that although the share of the agricultural sector in Ecuador's GDP is higher than in Hungary, the subsidy amounts for this sector are 36% lower than in Hungary.   JEL CODE: Q13
厄瓜多尔与匈牙利近10年农业补贴政策比较研究
农业补贴长期以来一直是政府政策关注的焦点;它们影响资源的使用,以实现本部门的不同目标。在本研究中,我们对厄瓜多尔和匈牙利近十年的农业补贴政策进行了比较研究,采用比较分析的方法进行实证推广,以更好地解释和理解两国的补贴政策。结果显示匈牙利在农业补贴方面比厄瓜多尔有巨大的优势。由于它们是欧盟共同农业政策的一部分,匈牙利的补贴是制度化的,并在欧盟和国家基金资助的一系列方案中长期规划。而在厄瓜多尔,农业政策作为一个总体框架存在,管理机构通过计划和项目管理补贴,这些计划和项目不会随着时间的推移而持续,并取决于该国当前的政治局势。同样,收集的数据表明,尽管厄瓜多尔农业部门在国内生产总值中所占的份额高于匈牙利,但该部门的补贴金额比匈牙利低36%。Jel代码:q13
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信