Hospital-based ambulatory clinic adoption of video and telephone visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a convergent mixed-methods study

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
V. Stamenova, Suman Budhwani, C. Soobiah, J. Fujioka, Rumaisa Khan, Rebecca Liu, Ilana Halperin, R. Bhatia, L. Desveaux
{"title":"Hospital-based ambulatory clinic adoption of video and telephone visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a convergent mixed-methods study","authors":"V. Stamenova, Suman Budhwani, C. Soobiah, J. Fujioka, Rumaisa Khan, Rebecca Liu, Ilana Halperin, R. Bhatia, L. Desveaux","doi":"10.1108/jica-01-2022-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this study is to understand virtual care use (e.g. telephone and video visits) during the COVID-19 pandemic across three hospital-based ambulatory clinics (i.e. mental health, renal and respiratory care) and to describe associated patient and provider experiences.Design/methodology/approachA mixed-methods convergent study was conducted including quantitative electronic medical records data on virtual care use, electronic surveys assessing domains of experience (e.g. satisfaction, acceptance and technology use) among patient and providers and semi-structured interviews exploring the associated barriers and facilitators of virtual care adoption.FindingsVirtual care adoption rates and relative modality use (telephone vs video) varied across specialty clinics. Mental health clinics) showed the greatest use of virtual care and greater use of video over telephone, as compared to renal and respiratory care, where telephone was used almost exclusively. Patients and providers reported an overall good satisfaction and acceptance of virtual care (60–72%) across clinics, but commonly observed barriers (technical problems, behavioral adaptations needed and inequity) persisted. Good value propositions, tech support and the presence of early adopters who can support others in workflow re-design and highlight value propositions of virtual care were listed as adoption facilitators.Originality/valueThe study provides a unique opportunity to compare the rate of virtual care adoption before and during the COVID-19 pandemic across distinct specialties that operate within the same organizational and political setting. This study showed that the nature of the condition (e.g. mental health conditions) and the characteristics of the users (e.g. younger patients) may drive models of care with higher rate of video use. Focusing on removing common barriers, like providing tech support and ensuring equitable access to patients, continues to be important even in the context of high virtual care adoption rates during the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":51837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jica-01-2022-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to understand virtual care use (e.g. telephone and video visits) during the COVID-19 pandemic across three hospital-based ambulatory clinics (i.e. mental health, renal and respiratory care) and to describe associated patient and provider experiences.Design/methodology/approachA mixed-methods convergent study was conducted including quantitative electronic medical records data on virtual care use, electronic surveys assessing domains of experience (e.g. satisfaction, acceptance and technology use) among patient and providers and semi-structured interviews exploring the associated barriers and facilitators of virtual care adoption.FindingsVirtual care adoption rates and relative modality use (telephone vs video) varied across specialty clinics. Mental health clinics) showed the greatest use of virtual care and greater use of video over telephone, as compared to renal and respiratory care, where telephone was used almost exclusively. Patients and providers reported an overall good satisfaction and acceptance of virtual care (60–72%) across clinics, but commonly observed barriers (technical problems, behavioral adaptations needed and inequity) persisted. Good value propositions, tech support and the presence of early adopters who can support others in workflow re-design and highlight value propositions of virtual care were listed as adoption facilitators.Originality/valueThe study provides a unique opportunity to compare the rate of virtual care adoption before and during the COVID-19 pandemic across distinct specialties that operate within the same organizational and political setting. This study showed that the nature of the condition (e.g. mental health conditions) and the characteristics of the users (e.g. younger patients) may drive models of care with higher rate of video use. Focusing on removing common barriers, like providing tech support and ensuring equitable access to patients, continues to be important even in the context of high virtual care adoption rates during the pandemic.
在COVID-19大流行之前和期间,医院门诊采用视频和电话就诊:一项融合混合方法研究
本研究的目的是了解COVID-19大流行期间三家医院门诊(即精神卫生、肾脏和呼吸保健)的虚拟护理使用情况(例如电话和视频访问),并描述相关的患者和提供者体验。设计/方法/方法进行了一项混合方法融合研究,包括使用虚拟护理的定量电子病历数据、评估患者和提供者的经验领域(例如满意度、接受度和技术使用)的电子调查,以及探索采用虚拟护理的相关障碍和促进因素的半结构化访谈。各专科诊所的虚拟医疗采用率和相对使用方式(电话和视频)各不相同。与几乎完全使用电话的肾脏和呼吸系统护理相比,心理健康诊所(精神健康诊所)最大程度地使用虚拟护理和更多地使用电话视频。患者和提供者报告了整个诊所对虚拟护理的总体满意度和接受度(60-72%),但普遍观察到的障碍(技术问题,需要的行为适应和不公平)仍然存在。良好的价值主张、技术支持和早期采用者的存在,这些采用者可以在工作流程重新设计中支持其他人,并突出虚拟护理的价值主张,这些都被列为采用促进因素。独创性/价值该研究提供了一个独特的机会,可以比较在同一组织和政治环境下运作的不同专业在COVID-19大流行之前和期间的虚拟护理采用率。这项研究表明,疾病的性质(如精神健康状况)和使用者的特征(如年轻患者)可能会推动视频使用率更高的护理模式。即使在大流行期间虚拟医疗采用率很高的背景下,注重消除共同障碍,如提供技术支持和确保公平获得患者服务,仍然很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Integrated Care
Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信