Algorithms for stable and perturbation-resilient problems

Haris Angelidakis, K. Makarychev, Yury Makarychev
{"title":"Algorithms for stable and perturbation-resilient problems","authors":"Haris Angelidakis, K. Makarychev, Yury Makarychev","doi":"10.1145/3055399.3055487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the notion of stability and perturbation resilience introduced by Bilu and Linial (2010) and Awasthi, Blum, and Sheffet (2012). A combinatorial optimization problem is α-stable or α-perturbation-resilient if the optimal solution does not change when we perturb all parameters of the problem by a factor of at most α. In this paper, we give improved algorithms for stable instances of various clustering and combinatorial optimization problems. We also prove several hardness results. We first give an exact algorithm for 2-perturbation resilient instances of clustering problems with natural center-based objectives. The class of clustering problems with natural center-based objectives includes such problems as k-means, k-median, and k-center. Our result improves upon the result of Balcan and Liang (2016), who gave an algorithm for clustering 1+√≈2.41 perturbation-resilient instances. Our result is tight in the sense that no polynomial-time algorithm can solve (2ε)-perturbation resilient instances of k-center unless NP = RP, as was shown by Balcan, Haghtalab, and White (2016). We then give an exact algorithm for (2-2/k)-stable instances of Minimum Multiway Cut with k terminals, improving the previous result of Makarychev, Makarychev, and Vijayaraghavan (2014), who gave an algorithm for 4-stable instances. We also give an algorithm for (2-2/k+ς)-weakly stable instances of Minimum Multiway Cut. Finally, we show that there are no robust polynomial-time algorithms for n1-ε-stable instances of Set Cover, Minimum Vertex Cover, and Min 2-Horn Deletion (unless P = NP).","PeriodicalId":20615,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3055399.3055487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

We study the notion of stability and perturbation resilience introduced by Bilu and Linial (2010) and Awasthi, Blum, and Sheffet (2012). A combinatorial optimization problem is α-stable or α-perturbation-resilient if the optimal solution does not change when we perturb all parameters of the problem by a factor of at most α. In this paper, we give improved algorithms for stable instances of various clustering and combinatorial optimization problems. We also prove several hardness results. We first give an exact algorithm for 2-perturbation resilient instances of clustering problems with natural center-based objectives. The class of clustering problems with natural center-based objectives includes such problems as k-means, k-median, and k-center. Our result improves upon the result of Balcan and Liang (2016), who gave an algorithm for clustering 1+√≈2.41 perturbation-resilient instances. Our result is tight in the sense that no polynomial-time algorithm can solve (2ε)-perturbation resilient instances of k-center unless NP = RP, as was shown by Balcan, Haghtalab, and White (2016). We then give an exact algorithm for (2-2/k)-stable instances of Minimum Multiway Cut with k terminals, improving the previous result of Makarychev, Makarychev, and Vijayaraghavan (2014), who gave an algorithm for 4-stable instances. We also give an algorithm for (2-2/k+ς)-weakly stable instances of Minimum Multiway Cut. Finally, we show that there are no robust polynomial-time algorithms for n1-ε-stable instances of Set Cover, Minimum Vertex Cover, and Min 2-Horn Deletion (unless P = NP).
稳定和扰动弹性问题的算法
我们研究了Bilu and Linial(2010)和Awasthi, Blum, and Sheffet(2012)引入的稳定性和扰动弹性的概念。当对组合优化问题的所有参数进行不超过α的扰动时,其最优解不发生变化,则该组合优化问题为α-稳定或α-扰动弹性问题。本文给出了各种聚类和组合优化问题稳定实例的改进算法。我们还证明了几个硬度结果。我们首先给出了具有自然中心目标的聚类问题的2摄动弹性实例的精确算法。具有自然中心目标的聚类问题包括k-means、k-median和k-center等问题。我们的结果改进了Balcan和Liang(2016)的结果,他们给出了1+√≈2.41个扰动弹性实例聚类的算法。我们的结果在某种意义上是紧密的,除非NP = RP,否则没有多项式时间算法可以解决k中心的(2ε)-扰动弹性实例,如Balcan, Haghtalab和White(2016)所示。然后,我们给出了具有k个终端的最小多路切割(2-2/k)稳定实例的精确算法,改进了Makarychev, Makarychev和Vijayaraghavan(2014)的先前结果,他们给出了4个稳定实例的算法。我们还给出了(2-2/k+ς)-最小多路切割的弱稳定实例的算法。最后,我们证明了对于集覆盖、最小顶点覆盖和最小2角删除(除非P = NP)的n1-ε-稳定实例没有鲁棒的多项式时间算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信