Comparison of Total Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Surgery for Inguinal Hernia Repair between Elderly and Non-Elderly Patients

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
O. Altın, S. Kaya
{"title":"Comparison of Total Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Surgery for Inguinal Hernia Repair between Elderly and Non-Elderly Patients","authors":"O. Altın, S. Kaya","doi":"10.6890/IJGE.202005_14(2).0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: With the increase in global life expectancy, more elderly patients are being treated in outpatient clinics of hospitals. Morbidity and mortality rates are higher in elderly patients than in non-elderly patients after laparoscopic surgery because of the high incidence of comorbidities, such as cardiac, pulmonary and renal disease, and decreased performance. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of total extraperitoneal laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair between elderly and non-elderly patients. Materials and Methods: Between March 2012 and January 2019, 210 patients underwent laparoscopy for inguinal hernia repair. Patients were categorised into two groups based on age: group 1 (< 65 years) and group 2 (≥ 65 years). Demographic data and surgical outcomes of patients were retrospectively analysed from hospital records. Results: In total, 108 (51.4%) patients in group 1 and 102 (48.6%) patients in group 2 with mean ages of 46.5 and 70.8 years, respectively, underwent surgery. Thirty six patients in group 1 and 102 patients in group 2 had comorbidities. The incidences of postoperative complications were eight (7.4%) and three (2.9%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 28.4 and 26.7 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Although three cases of recurring hernia were identified in group 1, one was reported in group 2. Conclusion: Although morbidity and mortality are higher in elderly patients, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair can be performed safely.","PeriodicalId":50321,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gerontology","volume":"57 1","pages":"115-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6890/IJGE.202005_14(2).0005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: With the increase in global life expectancy, more elderly patients are being treated in outpatient clinics of hospitals. Morbidity and mortality rates are higher in elderly patients than in non-elderly patients after laparoscopic surgery because of the high incidence of comorbidities, such as cardiac, pulmonary and renal disease, and decreased performance. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of total extraperitoneal laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair between elderly and non-elderly patients. Materials and Methods: Between March 2012 and January 2019, 210 patients underwent laparoscopy for inguinal hernia repair. Patients were categorised into two groups based on age: group 1 (< 65 years) and group 2 (≥ 65 years). Demographic data and surgical outcomes of patients were retrospectively analysed from hospital records. Results: In total, 108 (51.4%) patients in group 1 and 102 (48.6%) patients in group 2 with mean ages of 46.5 and 70.8 years, respectively, underwent surgery. Thirty six patients in group 1 and 102 patients in group 2 had comorbidities. The incidences of postoperative complications were eight (7.4%) and three (2.9%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 28.4 and 26.7 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Although three cases of recurring hernia were identified in group 1, one was reported in group 2. Conclusion: Although morbidity and mortality are higher in elderly patients, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair can be performed safely.
老年与非老年患者腹股沟疝全腹腔镜修补术的比较
导读:随着全球预期寿命的增加,越来越多的老年患者在医院的门诊接受治疗。老年患者在腹腔镜手术后的发病率和死亡率高于非老年患者,这是因为老年患者的合并症发生率高,如心脏、肺部和肾脏疾病,以及表现下降。本研究的目的是比较老年和非老年患者腹股沟疝全腹腔镜手术修复的结果。材料与方法:2012年3月至2019年1月,210例患者行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术。患者根据年龄分为两组:1组(< 65岁)和2组(≥65岁)。从医院记录中回顾性分析患者的人口统计资料和手术结果。结果:1组共手术108例(51.4%),2组共手术102例(48.6%),平均年龄分别为46.5岁和70.8岁。第1组36例,第2组102例存在合并症。术后并发症发生率1组为8例(7.4%),2组为3例(2.9%)。1组和2组的平均随访时间分别为28.4和26.7个月。虽然在组1中发现了3例复发性疝,但在组2中报告了1例。结论:虽然老年患者的发病率和死亡率较高,但腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术可以安全进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal aims to publish original research and review papers on all fields of geriatrics and gerontology, including those dealing with critical care and emergency medicine. The IJGE aims to explore and clarify the medical science and philosophy in all fields of geriatrics and gerontology, including those in the emergency and critical care medicine. The IJGE is determined not only to be a professional journal in gerontology, but also a leading source of information for the developing field of geriatric emergency and critical care medicine. It is a pioneer in Asia. Topics in the IJGE cover the advancement of diagnosis and management in urgent, serious and chronic intractable diseases in later life, preventive medicine, long-term care of disability, ethical issues in the diseased elderly and biochemistry, cell biology, endocrinology, molecular biology, pharmacology, physiology and protein chemistry involving diseases associated with age. We did not limit the territory to only critical or emergency condition inasmuch as chronic diseases are frequently brought about by inappropriate management of acute problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信