THE EVOCATIVE POWER OF TOURISM STUDIES: POSITIVE INTERRUPTION, INTERDEPENDENCE, AND IMAGING FORWARD TODAY

IF 0.5 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
{"title":"THE EVOCATIVE POWER OF TOURISM STUDIES: POSITIVE INTERRUPTION, INTERDEPENDENCE, AND IMAGING FORWARD TODAY","authors":"","doi":"10.3727/109830421x16257465701963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this third of three cousin manuscripts on the call for disruptive qualitative research approaches, further treatment is proffered on the concerns and irritations that ‘soft science’ / 'subtle science' social scientists (and humanists, and posthumanists) are troubled by today. While the opening paper (by Hollinshead, Suleman, and Nair here in Tourism, Culture and Communication *) laid out the general case for the fit of disruptive qualitative research advances cum dissident interpretive research overtures in Tourism Studies to help atone for the field's long-recognised biases towards highly-economic / linear / empirical outlooks, the second paper (by Hollinshead, Suleman, and Vellah **) constituted a consolidation of the advanced social justice orientations being aired across the trio of manuscripts. In this third of the three bedfellow articles, the authors (Hollinshead, Suleman, and Lo) now provide further critique on the soft science constructions and the subtle science thinking that have been promoted within the landmark text on advanced qualitative and interpretive praxis by Brown, Carducci, and Kuby (entitled Disrupting Qualitative Inquiry). In this third manuscript, the need for such dissident developments within Tourism Studies is provided with respect to a number (ten) of common ontological issues encountered in research into tourism/travel today, such as the difficulty in researching the shadowy and indistinct 'unique ways' in which foreign peoples differ from each other. At the end of this third manuscript, a further fifteen terms are made manifest for the cumulative glossary being developed across the three companion manuscripts. These terms include ‘critical ethnography' (vis-a-vis the revised cognitive practices of tourism) and 'unsettlement' (vis-à-vis the rhetorics of futurity of tourism). This third paper — like its two predecessors — is notably Deleuzian in hue, although readers should spot the conceptual mark of (Arturo) Escobar (and considerations of pluriversality which emanate from 'The South') in places. * The Unsettlement of Tourism Studies: Positive Decolonisation, Deep Listening, and Dethinking today (Hollinshead, Suleman, and Nair [In Press: TCC])** The Reimagination of Tourism Studies: Positive Renewal, Restoration, and Revival Today (Hollinshead, Suleman, and Vellah [In Press: TCC])","PeriodicalId":41836,"journal":{"name":"TOURISM CULTURE & COMMUNICATION","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TOURISM CULTURE & COMMUNICATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3727/109830421x16257465701963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this third of three cousin manuscripts on the call for disruptive qualitative research approaches, further treatment is proffered on the concerns and irritations that ‘soft science’ / 'subtle science' social scientists (and humanists, and posthumanists) are troubled by today. While the opening paper (by Hollinshead, Suleman, and Nair here in Tourism, Culture and Communication *) laid out the general case for the fit of disruptive qualitative research advances cum dissident interpretive research overtures in Tourism Studies to help atone for the field's long-recognised biases towards highly-economic / linear / empirical outlooks, the second paper (by Hollinshead, Suleman, and Vellah **) constituted a consolidation of the advanced social justice orientations being aired across the trio of manuscripts. In this third of the three bedfellow articles, the authors (Hollinshead, Suleman, and Lo) now provide further critique on the soft science constructions and the subtle science thinking that have been promoted within the landmark text on advanced qualitative and interpretive praxis by Brown, Carducci, and Kuby (entitled Disrupting Qualitative Inquiry). In this third manuscript, the need for such dissident developments within Tourism Studies is provided with respect to a number (ten) of common ontological issues encountered in research into tourism/travel today, such as the difficulty in researching the shadowy and indistinct 'unique ways' in which foreign peoples differ from each other. At the end of this third manuscript, a further fifteen terms are made manifest for the cumulative glossary being developed across the three companion manuscripts. These terms include ‘critical ethnography' (vis-a-vis the revised cognitive practices of tourism) and 'unsettlement' (vis-à-vis the rhetorics of futurity of tourism). This third paper — like its two predecessors — is notably Deleuzian in hue, although readers should spot the conceptual mark of (Arturo) Escobar (and considerations of pluriversality which emanate from 'The South') in places. * The Unsettlement of Tourism Studies: Positive Decolonisation, Deep Listening, and Dethinking today (Hollinshead, Suleman, and Nair [In Press: TCC])** The Reimagination of Tourism Studies: Positive Renewal, Restoration, and Revival Today (Hollinshead, Suleman, and Vellah [In Press: TCC])
旅游研究的唤起力:积极的中断、相互依存和展望今天
在呼吁颠覆性定性研究方法的三份同类手稿中的第三份中,对“软科学”/“微妙科学”社会科学家(以及人文主义者和后人文主义者)今天所困扰的问题和愤怒进行了进一步的处理。虽然第一篇论文(由Hollinshead、Suleman和Nair撰写的《旅游、文化与传播》*)概述了旅游研究中颠覆性质的研究进展与不同的解释性研究提议相结合的总体案例,以帮助弥补该领域长期以来公认的高度经济/线性/实证前景的偏见,第二篇论文(由Hollinshead、Suleman,和维拉(Vellah **)构成了对先进社会正义取向的巩固,这些取向贯穿了三本手稿。在这三篇同室文章的第三篇中,作者(Hollinshead, Suleman和Lo)现在对布朗、卡杜奇和库比(题为“扰乱定性探究”)关于高级定性和解释性实践的里程碑式文本中所提倡的软科学结构和微妙科学思维进行了进一步的批评。在这第三份手稿中,针对当今旅游/旅行研究中遇到的一些(十个)常见本体论问题,提供了对旅游研究中这种不同发展的需求,例如在研究外国人彼此不同的模糊和模糊的“独特方式”方面的困难。在这第三个手稿的末尾,进一步的15个术语是为在三个同伴手稿中开发的累积术语表而显示的。这些术语包括“批判性人种学”(相对于修订后的旅游认知实践)和“不定居”(相对于-à-vis旅游业未来的修辞)。这第三篇论文——就像它的前两篇一样——在色彩上明显是德勒兹式的,尽管读者应该在某些地方发现(阿图罗)埃斯科瓦尔的概念标记(以及来自“南方”的多元化的考虑)。*旅游研究的不稳定:积极的去殖民化,深度倾听,和去思考今天(Hollinshead, Suleman, and Nair [In Press: TCC])**旅游研究的重新想象:积极的更新,恢复,和复兴今天(Hollinshead, Suleman, and Vellah [In Press: TCC])
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
TOURISM CULTURE & COMMUNICATION
TOURISM CULTURE & COMMUNICATION HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Tourism, Culture & Communication is the longest established international refereed journal that is dedicated to the cultural dimensions of tourism. The editors adopt a purposefully broad scope that welcomes readers and contributors from diverse disciplines and who are receptive in a wide variety of research methods. While potential cultural issues and identities are unlimited, there is a requirement that their consideration should relate to the tourism and hospitality domain. Tourism, Culture & Communication provides readers with multidisciplinary perspectives that consider topics and fields extending beyond national and indigenous cultures as they are traditionally understood and recognized. Coverage may extend to issues such as cultural dimensions of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), gender and tourism, managing tourists with disabilities, sport tourism, or age-specific tourism. Contributions that draw upon the communications literature to explain the tourism phenomenon are also particularly welcome. Beyond the focus on culture and communications, the editors recognize the important interrelationships with economies, society, politics, and the environment. The journal publishes high-quality research and applies a double-blind refereeing process. Tourism, Culture & Communication consists of main articles, major thematic reviews, position papers on theory and practice, and substantive case studies. A reports section covers specific initiatives and projects, “hot topics,” work-in-progress, and critical reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信