Introduction to Special Issues on Cross-Cultural Aspects of Self-Help/Mutual Aid

自我保健 Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI:10.2190/SH.5.1.D
T. Borkman
{"title":"Introduction to Special Issues on Cross-Cultural Aspects of Self-Help/Mutual Aid","authors":"T. Borkman","doi":"10.2190/SH.5.1.D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The special call for papers on the cross-cultural aspects of self-help/mutual aid began in mid-2007 with the solicitation of manuscripts from a variety of social science listservs and professional associations including ones in anthropology, sociology, public health, and community psychology. Ten interesting papers have survived the blind peer review and revise and resubmit process and will be published in three special issues of this journal. The issues are truly international as we have authors from Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, Norway, Sweden, and the United States; their research includes those countries as well as Malawi, Africa. My vision for these special issues was inspired by several papers presented at the International Conference on Self-Help/Mutual Aid in Ottawa, Canada in 1992. First, Benjamin Gidron and Mark Chesler’s (1994) paper “ Universal and Particular Attributes of Self-Help: A Framework for International and Intranational Analysis” was and remains the first broad and inclusive framework for investigating self-help/mutual aid comparatively and globally. While the research on self-help/mutual aid during the last three decades has increased our understanding of its variety, its internal processes and its benefits to participants, most research known to us and our readers has been conducted within one country, especially the United States, Canada or Europe. In contrast, the systematic comparative study of self-help/mutual aid in different cultural, social, and health care contexts which Gidron and Chesler advocated is in its infancy. These special issues address those lacunae.","PeriodicalId":64356,"journal":{"name":"自我保健","volume":"24 1","pages":"9-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"自我保健","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/SH.5.1.D","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The special call for papers on the cross-cultural aspects of self-help/mutual aid began in mid-2007 with the solicitation of manuscripts from a variety of social science listservs and professional associations including ones in anthropology, sociology, public health, and community psychology. Ten interesting papers have survived the blind peer review and revise and resubmit process and will be published in three special issues of this journal. The issues are truly international as we have authors from Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, Norway, Sweden, and the United States; their research includes those countries as well as Malawi, Africa. My vision for these special issues was inspired by several papers presented at the International Conference on Self-Help/Mutual Aid in Ottawa, Canada in 1992. First, Benjamin Gidron and Mark Chesler’s (1994) paper “ Universal and Particular Attributes of Self-Help: A Framework for International and Intranational Analysis” was and remains the first broad and inclusive framework for investigating self-help/mutual aid comparatively and globally. While the research on self-help/mutual aid during the last three decades has increased our understanding of its variety, its internal processes and its benefits to participants, most research known to us and our readers has been conducted within one country, especially the United States, Canada or Europe. In contrast, the systematic comparative study of self-help/mutual aid in different cultural, social, and health care contexts which Gidron and Chesler advocated is in its infancy. These special issues address those lacunae.
关于自助/互助的跨文化方面的专题介绍
关于自助/互助的跨文化方面的论文特别征集始于2007年中期,从各种社会科学listservs和专业协会征集手稿,包括人类学、社会学、公共卫生和社区心理学。10篇有趣的论文通过了同行的盲审和修改再提交过程,将发表在本刊的三期特刊上。这些问题是真正的国际化,因为我们有来自澳大利亚,加拿大,德国,日本,挪威,瑞典和美国的作者;他们的研究包括这些国家以及非洲的马拉维。我对这些特刊的看法是受到1992年在加拿大渥太华举行的国际自助/互助会议上发表的几篇论文的启发。首先,本杰明·吉德隆和马克·切斯勒(1994)的论文“自助的普遍和特殊属性:国际和国内分析框架”是并且仍然是第一个广泛和包容的框架,用于比较和全球范围内研究自助/互助。虽然在过去的三十年里,关于自助/互助的研究增加了我们对它的多样性、它的内部过程和它对参与者的好处的理解,但我们和读者所知道的大多数研究都是在一个国家内进行的,尤其是美国、加拿大或欧洲。相比之下,Gidron和Chesler所倡导的自助/互助在不同文化、社会和卫生保健背景下的系统比较研究还处于起步阶段。这些特别问题解决了这些空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20554
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书