A Legal Advisor's Responsibility to the International Community: When Is Legal Advice a War Crime?

Ellia Ciammaichella
{"title":"A Legal Advisor's Responsibility to the International Community: When Is Legal Advice a War Crime?","authors":"Ellia Ciammaichella","doi":"10.5750/DLJ.V18I1.311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Practically every attorney in every state of the United States of America takes an oath to uphold the US and that state’s Constitution. Upon taking the oath, most US lawyers become an officer of the court (“judicial officer”). As an officer of the court they are held to a higher standard of integrity and candor as is required by that state’s professional responsibility rules. As such, although an attorney is an advocate for his client, in some situations, an attorney must set aside his role as advocate and assert his role as judicial officer to maintain the integrity of the judicial system and uphold the US and state Constitution. The constant tension between an attorney’s role as judicial officer and advocate occurs because giving advice about the law an attorney’s main purpose and often that advice may further criminal conduct. However, as Professor Newman eloquently put it, “[n]either the status of ‘lawyer’ nor the obligation to provide access to the law should exempt lawyers from the criminal liabilities which face everyone else.” While Professor Newman was specifically referring to a lawyer’s responsibility in the domestic sphere, this is equally applicable to a legal advisor’s responsibility to the international community. Concededly, an attorney does not take an oath to uphold international law. However, because a lawyer should not be exempt from the law, each and every attorney, like everyone else, should be legally responsible to the international community. This article argues that there are some limited situations where a lawyer, specifically a government legal advisor, has certain basic legal responsibilities to the international community that trump his responsibility to his government. As the Nuremberg trials emphasized, no government official is immune from an international crime simply because he is acting within his official capacity. Rather, because the State cannot act without people to act on","PeriodicalId":83444,"journal":{"name":"Valparaiso University law review. Valparaiso University. School of Law","volume":"23 1","pages":"1143-1164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Valparaiso University law review. Valparaiso University. School of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/DLJ.V18I1.311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Practically every attorney in every state of the United States of America takes an oath to uphold the US and that state’s Constitution. Upon taking the oath, most US lawyers become an officer of the court (“judicial officer”). As an officer of the court they are held to a higher standard of integrity and candor as is required by that state’s professional responsibility rules. As such, although an attorney is an advocate for his client, in some situations, an attorney must set aside his role as advocate and assert his role as judicial officer to maintain the integrity of the judicial system and uphold the US and state Constitution. The constant tension between an attorney’s role as judicial officer and advocate occurs because giving advice about the law an attorney’s main purpose and often that advice may further criminal conduct. However, as Professor Newman eloquently put it, “[n]either the status of ‘lawyer’ nor the obligation to provide access to the law should exempt lawyers from the criminal liabilities which face everyone else.” While Professor Newman was specifically referring to a lawyer’s responsibility in the domestic sphere, this is equally applicable to a legal advisor’s responsibility to the international community. Concededly, an attorney does not take an oath to uphold international law. However, because a lawyer should not be exempt from the law, each and every attorney, like everyone else, should be legally responsible to the international community. This article argues that there are some limited situations where a lawyer, specifically a government legal advisor, has certain basic legal responsibilities to the international community that trump his responsibility to his government. As the Nuremberg trials emphasized, no government official is immune from an international crime simply because he is acting within his official capacity. Rather, because the State cannot act without people to act on
法律顾问对国际社会的责任:法律咨询何时构成战争罪?
实际上,美国每个州的每个律师都宣誓维护美国和该州的宪法。在宣誓后,大多数美国律师成为法院官员(“司法官员”)。作为法院的工作人员,他们被要求达到更高的正直和坦率标准,这是该州职业责任规则所要求的。因此,尽管律师是其当事人的辩护人,但在某些情况下,律师必须抛开辩护人的角色,坚持自己作为司法官员的角色,以维护司法系统的完整性,维护美国和州宪法。律师作为司法官员的角色与辩护律师的角色之间经常存在紧张关系,因为提供法律建议是律师的主要目的,而这种建议往往可能会助长犯罪行为。然而,正如纽曼教授雄辩地指出的那样,“无论是‘律师’的地位,还是提供法律援助的义务,都不应使律师免除其他人所面临的刑事责任。”虽然纽曼教授具体提到律师在国内领域的责任,但这同样适用于法律顾问对国际社会的责任。当然,律师并不宣誓维护国际法。然而,由于律师不应免受法律的约束,每一位律师都应像其他人一样,对国际社会负有法律责任。本文认为,在某些有限的情况下,律师,特别是政府法律顾问,对国际社会负有一定的基本法律责任,而不是对其政府的责任。正如纽伦堡审判所强调的那样,任何政府官员都不能仅仅因为在其官方职权范围内行事而免于国际罪行。更确切地说,因为没有人民的行动,国家就无法行动
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信