Cost-effectiveness of Combination Therapy of Anticoagulants/antiplatelets with Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Systematic Review

YeongAe Lee, Sun-Hong Kwon, Na-Hyun Kim, Eui-Kyung Lee
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of Combination Therapy of Anticoagulants/antiplatelets with Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Systematic Review","authors":"YeongAe Lee, Sun-Hong Kwon, Na-Hyun Kim, Eui-Kyung Lee","doi":"10.17480/psk.2022.66.5.292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anticoagulants/antiplatelets are effective in preventing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, as an adverse effect, the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) leads to additional costs due to increased treatment and decreased quality of life. Accordingly, the administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is recommended to prevent UGIB. We conducted a systematic review of economic evaluations of PPI co-therapy for patients taking long-term anticoagulants/ antiplatelets to prevent CVDs to examine the cost effectiveness of PPI co-therapy. We searched literature from PubMed and EMBASE with keywords including types of economic evaluations and active ingredients of anticoagulants and antiplatelets on 13/07/2022. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review. As a result, six economic evaluation studies were identified. All studies compared PPI co-therapy with low-dose aspirin to prevent CVDs. We confirmed the cost-effectiveness of PPI co-therapy with the respective incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in each base case. In the sensitivity analyses, the PPI cost and adherence influenced the ICER the most. The quality of reporting, which was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist, was 87-96%. In the present study, we found that PPI co-therapy was cost-effective and tended to improve the patient’s life years and quality-adjusted life years. These results can be used as evidence for further economic evaluation studies to verify the costeffectiveness of anticoagulants/antiplatelets and PPI co-therapy.","PeriodicalId":23923,"journal":{"name":"Yakhak Hoeji","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yakhak Hoeji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17480/psk.2022.66.5.292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anticoagulants/antiplatelets are effective in preventing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, as an adverse effect, the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) leads to additional costs due to increased treatment and decreased quality of life. Accordingly, the administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is recommended to prevent UGIB. We conducted a systematic review of economic evaluations of PPI co-therapy for patients taking long-term anticoagulants/ antiplatelets to prevent CVDs to examine the cost effectiveness of PPI co-therapy. We searched literature from PubMed and EMBASE with keywords including types of economic evaluations and active ingredients of anticoagulants and antiplatelets on 13/07/2022. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review. As a result, six economic evaluation studies were identified. All studies compared PPI co-therapy with low-dose aspirin to prevent CVDs. We confirmed the cost-effectiveness of PPI co-therapy with the respective incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in each base case. In the sensitivity analyses, the PPI cost and adherence influenced the ICER the most. The quality of reporting, which was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist, was 87-96%. In the present study, we found that PPI co-therapy was cost-effective and tended to improve the patient’s life years and quality-adjusted life years. These results can be used as evidence for further economic evaluation studies to verify the costeffectiveness of anticoagulants/antiplatelets and PPI co-therapy.
抗凝血/抗血小板联合质子泵抑制剂治疗的成本-效果:一项系统综述
抗凝剂/抗血小板在预防心血管疾病(cvd)方面是有效的。然而,作为一种不良反应,上消化道出血(UGIB)的风险由于治疗增加和生活质量下降而导致额外的费用。因此,建议使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)来预防UGIB。我们对长期服用抗凝/抗血小板药物预防心血管疾病的患者进行PPI联合治疗的经济评估进行了系统回顾,以检查PPI联合治疗的成本效益。我们于2022年7月13日检索PubMed和EMBASE的相关文献,关键词包括抗凝血剂和抗血小板药物的经济评价类型和有效成分。两位独立的审稿人进行了系统的审查。结果,确定了六项经济评价研究。所有的研究都比较了PPI联合治疗与低剂量阿司匹林预防心血管疾病的效果。在每个基本病例中,我们用各自的增量成本-效果比(ICER)确认了PPI联合治疗的成本-效果。在敏感性分析中,PPI成本和依从性对ICER影响最大。使用综合卫生经济评价报告标准清单评估的报告质量为87-96%。在本研究中,我们发现PPI联合治疗具有成本效益,并倾向于改善患者的生命年和质量调整生命年。这些结果可以作为进一步经济评估研究的证据,以验证抗凝血剂/抗血小板和PPI联合治疗的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信