The development of aerobic capacity: a comparison of continuous and interval training.

L. W. Gregory
{"title":"The development of aerobic capacity: a comparison of continuous and interval training.","authors":"L. W. Gregory","doi":"10.1080/10671315.1979.10615601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Untrained college males were randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups or a control group. There were five, seven, and nine subjects in the control, interval, and continuous groups, respectively. Training consisted of jogging or running on a quarter-mile track for a distance of 2 miles, 5 days a week for 6 weeks. The continuous group trained at an intensity of 162 beats per minute (bpm), while the interval group trained at 174 bpm. A minimum of three 4-minute work intervals and a work/rest ratio of 1:1 were utilized by the interval group. Significant (p < .01) within-group (pre- versus posttraining) differences were found in the experimental groups for oxygen uptake (ml/kg·minute) at 180 bpm and Balke treadmill performance. Analysis of covariance demonstrated significant (p < .05) differences in aerobic capacity and treadmill performance among groups. Post hoc comparisons revealed significant (p < .05) differences between the control group and each experimental group. No significant dif...","PeriodicalId":76424,"journal":{"name":"Research quarterly","volume":"39 1","pages":"199-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10671315.1979.10615601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Abstract Untrained college males were randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups or a control group. There were five, seven, and nine subjects in the control, interval, and continuous groups, respectively. Training consisted of jogging or running on a quarter-mile track for a distance of 2 miles, 5 days a week for 6 weeks. The continuous group trained at an intensity of 162 beats per minute (bpm), while the interval group trained at 174 bpm. A minimum of three 4-minute work intervals and a work/rest ratio of 1:1 were utilized by the interval group. Significant (p < .01) within-group (pre- versus posttraining) differences were found in the experimental groups for oxygen uptake (ml/kg·minute) at 180 bpm and Balke treadmill performance. Analysis of covariance demonstrated significant (p < .05) differences in aerobic capacity and treadmill performance among groups. Post hoc comparisons revealed significant (p < .05) differences between the control group and each experimental group. No significant dif...
有氧能力的发展:连续训练和间歇训练的比较。
未经训练的大学男生被随机分为两个实验组或对照组。对照组、间歇组和连续组分别有5名、7名和9名受试者。训练包括慢跑或在1 / 4英里的跑道上跑2英里,每周5天,持续6周。连续组以每分钟162拍的强度训练,而间歇组以每分钟174拍的强度训练。间隔组使用至少3次4分钟的工作间隔和1:1的工作/休息比。实验组180 bpm摄氧量(ml/kg·min)和Balke跑步机性能组内(训练前后)差异显著(p < 0.01)。协方差分析显示,组间有氧能力和跑步机性能差异显著(p < 0.05)。事后比较显示对照组和实验组之间有显著差异(p < 0.05)。没有显著差异……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信