The War in Former Yugoslavia and Religion

IF 0.5 0 RELIGION
Srdjan Vrcan
{"title":"The War in Former Yugoslavia and Religion","authors":"Srdjan Vrcan","doi":"10.1080/09637499408431664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IIt is a legitimate, intriguing and urgent challenge to contemporary sociological research to enquire into the role of religion in the Yugoslav crisis. The question involves more than simply the relationship between religion and war: it involves the earlier and wider question of the role of religion in deepening social divisions and cleavages until they reach the point of fracture and in exacerbating social conflicts until they reach maximum incandescence. It also involves the question of the rela­ tionship of religious confessions to each other, and to the otherness of the others, in an area with mixed population, muIticonfessional, multinational and multicultural. Two fundamental a priori objections may of course be made to asking the question at all. Firstly, some will point out that the war has been characterised as a religious one by the propaganda apparatus of one or other of the conflicting parties with the purely propagandistic aim of concealing the real nature of the war and creating (at least) confusion in international public opinion. It is more or less obvious, however, that this war has not been a religious war. It is evidently a political war, caused by politi­ cal strategies which since the beginning of the Yugoslav crisis have been on a colli­ sion course. It is a war which fully confirms the well-known formula of Klausewitz that war is but a continuation of politics by other means. However, this does not mean that religion has nothing to do with the war. It is also more or less obvious that the three major confessions of the region, Catholicism, Orthodoxy and Islam, have all been implicated and involved in the conflict in some way and to some degree. Here we see an analogy with the civil war in Lebanon and the chronic conflict in Northern Ireland. In both these cases the wars have not been 'religious' in terms of the classical definition of a 'holy war'; I but at the same time it has been obvious that religion has not been a purely passive onlooker but has been actively engaged in the conflict. Consequently at an impressionistic level the assertions of F. Vreg sound a convincing note: Amongst the demons of destruction of the processes of cultural rapproche­ ment in the European area have been not only growing ethnicism, which frequently turns into the malignant tumour of nationalism, but also reli­ gious mysticism. We have seen a brutal eruption not only of national feel­ ings with their political symbols, but of religious feelings and symbols too, and this has been wrongly understood as a religious rebirth. Croatian soldiers wear not only HDZ badges, but Catholic crosses too; Serbian soldiers do not carry photographs of Milo~evic but Orthodox crosses. Muslim fundamentalists and mujaheddins kill under the slogan of Allah.","PeriodicalId":41271,"journal":{"name":"Politics and Religion Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics and Religion Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09637499408431664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

IIt is a legitimate, intriguing and urgent challenge to contemporary sociological research to enquire into the role of religion in the Yugoslav crisis. The question involves more than simply the relationship between religion and war: it involves the earlier and wider question of the role of religion in deepening social divisions and cleavages until they reach the point of fracture and in exacerbating social conflicts until they reach maximum incandescence. It also involves the question of the rela­ tionship of religious confessions to each other, and to the otherness of the others, in an area with mixed population, muIticonfessional, multinational and multicultural. Two fundamental a priori objections may of course be made to asking the question at all. Firstly, some will point out that the war has been characterised as a religious one by the propaganda apparatus of one or other of the conflicting parties with the purely propagandistic aim of concealing the real nature of the war and creating (at least) confusion in international public opinion. It is more or less obvious, however, that this war has not been a religious war. It is evidently a political war, caused by politi­ cal strategies which since the beginning of the Yugoslav crisis have been on a colli­ sion course. It is a war which fully confirms the well-known formula of Klausewitz that war is but a continuation of politics by other means. However, this does not mean that religion has nothing to do with the war. It is also more or less obvious that the three major confessions of the region, Catholicism, Orthodoxy and Islam, have all been implicated and involved in the conflict in some way and to some degree. Here we see an analogy with the civil war in Lebanon and the chronic conflict in Northern Ireland. In both these cases the wars have not been 'religious' in terms of the classical definition of a 'holy war'; I but at the same time it has been obvious that religion has not been a purely passive onlooker but has been actively engaged in the conflict. Consequently at an impressionistic level the assertions of F. Vreg sound a convincing note: Amongst the demons of destruction of the processes of cultural rapproche­ ment in the European area have been not only growing ethnicism, which frequently turns into the malignant tumour of nationalism, but also reli­ gious mysticism. We have seen a brutal eruption not only of national feel­ ings with their political symbols, but of religious feelings and symbols too, and this has been wrongly understood as a religious rebirth. Croatian soldiers wear not only HDZ badges, but Catholic crosses too; Serbian soldiers do not carry photographs of Milo~evic but Orthodox crosses. Muslim fundamentalists and mujaheddins kill under the slogan of Allah.
前南斯拉夫战争与宗教
探究宗教在南斯拉夫危机中的作用,是当代社会学研究面临的一个合理、有趣和紧迫的挑战。这个问题涉及的不仅仅是宗教与战争之间的关系:它还涉及到一个更早、更广泛的问题,即宗教在加深社会分裂和分裂,直到它们达到破裂的地步,并加剧社会冲突,直到它们达到最白热化的程度方面所起的作用。它还涉及到在一个人口混合、多教派、多民族和多元文化的地区,宗教信仰彼此之间以及与他人之间的关系问题。当然,提出这个问题可能会有两个基本的先天的反对意见。首先,有些人会指出,冲突一方或另一方的宣传机构将这场战争定性为一场宗教战争,其纯粹的宣传目的是掩盖战争的真实性质,并(至少)在国际舆论中制造混乱。然而,或多或少可以明显看出,这场战争并不是一场宗教战争。这显然是一场政治战争,是由自南斯拉夫危机开始以来一直处于冲突过程中的政治战略引起的。这场战争充分证实了克劳塞维茨那句著名的公式:战争不过是政治的另一种方式的继续。然而,这并不意味着宗教与战争无关。同样或多或少明显的是,该地区的三大教派——天主教、东正教和伊斯兰教——都以某种方式和某种程度上卷入了这场冲突。我们在这里看到了黎巴嫩内战和北爱尔兰长期冲突的相似之处。这两场战争都不属于"宗教战争"经典定义下的"宗教战争"但与此同时,很明显,宗教并不是一个纯粹被动的旁观者,而是积极地参与了冲突。因此,在印象主义的层面上,F. Vreg的断言听起来令人信服:在破坏欧洲地区文化和解进程的恶魔中,不仅是日益增长的种族主义,它经常变成民族主义的恶性肿瘤,而且还有宗教神秘主义。我们不仅看到了带有政治象征的民族感情的野蛮爆发,也看到了宗教感情和象征的野蛮爆发,而这被错误地理解为宗教的重生。克罗地亚士兵不仅佩带民主联盟徽章,还佩带天主教十字架;塞尔维亚士兵不携带米洛耶维奇的照片,而是携带东正教十字架。穆斯林原教旨主义者和圣战者打着安拉的旗号杀人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信