Clinical and Vascular Outcome in Internal Carotid Artery Versus Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusions After Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator

I. Linfante, R. Llinas, M. Selim, C. Chaves, Sandeep Kumar, R. Parker, L. Caplan, G. Schlaug
{"title":"Clinical and Vascular Outcome in Internal Carotid Artery Versus Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusions After Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator","authors":"I. Linfante, R. Llinas, M. Selim, C. Chaves, Sandeep Kumar, R. Parker, L. Caplan, G. Schlaug","doi":"10.1161/01.STR.0000021001.18101.A5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose— Early reperfusion is a predictor of good outcome in acute ischemic stroke. We investigated whether middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions have a better clinical outcome and proportion of recanalization compared with internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion after standard treatment with intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Patients— In a retrospective analysis of our prospective stroke database between January 7, 1998, and January 30, 2002, we identified 36 consecutive patients who were treated with IV tPA within 3 hours after symptom onset of a stroke in the distribution of a documented ICA or MCA occlusion. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was recorded before tPA, at 24 hours, 3 days, and 3 months after stroke. Three-month outcome was recorded by modified Rankin scale. Magnetic resonance angiography or computed tomographic angiography was obtained before tPA. The presence of recanalization was assessed by transcranial Doppler and/or magnetic resonance angiography within 3 days after stroke onset. Results— Nineteen patients had MCA occlusion, and 17 had ICA-plus-MCA occlusion before tPA. Although there was no difference in age and NIHSS at day 0 between the 2 groups, the MCA group had a lower day 3 NIHSS score compared with the ICA group (P =0.006) in an ANCOVA. In addition, patients who had a MCA occlusion had lower day 1 and 3 NIHSS scores compared with the ICA group (P =0.04 and P =0.03, respectively; Wilcoxon rank sum). Similarly, NIHSS was significantly lower in patients who recanalized on days 1 and 3 (P =0.004 and P =0.003 respectively, Wilcoxon rank sum). When we adjusted for NIHSS score at day 0 in an ANCOVA, the adjusted mean was lower in the group that recanalized compared with the group that did not recanalize (P <0.001). There was a significant difference between the proportion of recanalization in the MCA group (15 of 17 recanalized, 88%) at 3 days after tPA compared with that of the ICA group (5 of 16 recanalized, 31%;P =0.001, Fisher exact test). The 3-month modified Rankin scale was not different between the 2 groups. Conclusions— Despite comparable age and NIHSS scores before IV tPA, MCA occlusions have lower day 1 and 3 NIHSS scores and higher proportion of recanalization compared with ICA occlusions. A combined IV/intra-arterial or mechanical thrombolysis may be needed to achieve early recanalization in ICA occlusions.","PeriodicalId":22274,"journal":{"name":"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"52 1","pages":"2066-2071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"259","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000021001.18101.A5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 259

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Early reperfusion is a predictor of good outcome in acute ischemic stroke. We investigated whether middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions have a better clinical outcome and proportion of recanalization compared with internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion after standard treatment with intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Patients— In a retrospective analysis of our prospective stroke database between January 7, 1998, and January 30, 2002, we identified 36 consecutive patients who were treated with IV tPA within 3 hours after symptom onset of a stroke in the distribution of a documented ICA or MCA occlusion. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was recorded before tPA, at 24 hours, 3 days, and 3 months after stroke. Three-month outcome was recorded by modified Rankin scale. Magnetic resonance angiography or computed tomographic angiography was obtained before tPA. The presence of recanalization was assessed by transcranial Doppler and/or magnetic resonance angiography within 3 days after stroke onset. Results— Nineteen patients had MCA occlusion, and 17 had ICA-plus-MCA occlusion before tPA. Although there was no difference in age and NIHSS at day 0 between the 2 groups, the MCA group had a lower day 3 NIHSS score compared with the ICA group (P =0.006) in an ANCOVA. In addition, patients who had a MCA occlusion had lower day 1 and 3 NIHSS scores compared with the ICA group (P =0.04 and P =0.03, respectively; Wilcoxon rank sum). Similarly, NIHSS was significantly lower in patients who recanalized on days 1 and 3 (P =0.004 and P =0.003 respectively, Wilcoxon rank sum). When we adjusted for NIHSS score at day 0 in an ANCOVA, the adjusted mean was lower in the group that recanalized compared with the group that did not recanalize (P <0.001). There was a significant difference between the proportion of recanalization in the MCA group (15 of 17 recanalized, 88%) at 3 days after tPA compared with that of the ICA group (5 of 16 recanalized, 31%;P =0.001, Fisher exact test). The 3-month modified Rankin scale was not different between the 2 groups. Conclusions— Despite comparable age and NIHSS scores before IV tPA, MCA occlusions have lower day 1 and 3 NIHSS scores and higher proportion of recanalization compared with ICA occlusions. A combined IV/intra-arterial or mechanical thrombolysis may be needed to achieve early recanalization in ICA occlusions.
静脉注射组织纤溶酶原激活剂后颈内动脉与大脑中动脉闭塞的临床和血管预后
背景与目的——早期再灌注是急性缺血性脑卒中预后良好的预测指标。我们研究了在静脉(IV)组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)标准治疗后,与颈内动脉(ICA)闭塞相比,大脑中动脉(MCA)闭塞是否有更好的临床结果和再通比例。患者:在1998年1月7日至2002年1月30日的前瞻性卒中数据库的回顾性分析中,我们确定了36例连续患者,他们在卒中症状发作后3小时内接受静脉tPA治疗,分布在记录的ICA或MCA闭塞的分布中。分别在tPA前、卒中后24小时、3天和3个月记录美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分。采用改良Rankin量表记录3个月疗效。术前行磁共振血管造影或计算机断层血管造影。卒中发作后3天内通过经颅多普勒和/或磁共振血管造影评估再通的存在。结果:19例患者有MCA闭塞,17例患者在tPA前有ica + MCA闭塞。虽然两组患者的年龄和第0天的NIHSS没有差异,但在ANCOVA中,MCA组第3天的NIHSS评分低于ICA组(P =0.006)。此外,与ICA组相比,MCA闭塞患者的第1天和第3天NIHSS评分较低(P =0.04和P =0.03;Wilcoxon秩和)。同样,在第1天和第3天再通的患者NIHSS显著降低(P =0.004和P =0.003, Wilcoxon秩和)。当我们在ANCOVA中调整第0天的NIHSS评分时,再通组的调整平均值低于未再通组(P <0.001)。在tPA后3天,MCA组(17例再通15例,88%)与ICA组(16例再通5例,31%,P =0.001, Fisher精确检验)的再通比例有显著差异。两组3个月改良Rankin量表差异无统计学意义。结论-尽管IV tPA前的年龄和NIHSS评分相当,但与ICA闭塞相比,MCA闭塞的第1天和第3天NIHSS评分较低,再通比例较高。可能需要联合静脉/动脉内溶栓或机械溶栓来实现ICA闭塞的早期再通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信