{"title":"Use of Bibliometrics-Related Terms, their Evolution, and the Growth of Metrics in Science","authors":"Yves Fassin, Ronald Rousseau","doi":"10.5530/jscires.12.2.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". ABSTRACT This article analyses the evolution of the most-used terms referring to the (broad) field of bibliometrics. It compares the number of publications on bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics, web(o)metrics, altmetrics, and the science of science, in three international databases, the Web of Science, Scopus, and Dimensions. We found that the relative number of documents using one of the metrics-related terms is showing a more than exponential increase. This illustrates the increasing importance of metrics in the world of science. While most terms separately show a clear increase in use, web(o)metrics and perhaps, informetrics, seem to have reached their top. Bibliometrics and scientometrics are the most-used terms, with, nowadays, the term bibliometrics being used about five times more than the term scientometrics. Any comprehensive bibliometric study should make use of a combination of related keywords to cover the whole field of study.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.2.048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
. ABSTRACT This article analyses the evolution of the most-used terms referring to the (broad) field of bibliometrics. It compares the number of publications on bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics, web(o)metrics, altmetrics, and the science of science, in three international databases, the Web of Science, Scopus, and Dimensions. We found that the relative number of documents using one of the metrics-related terms is showing a more than exponential increase. This illustrates the increasing importance of metrics in the world of science. While most terms separately show a clear increase in use, web(o)metrics and perhaps, informetrics, seem to have reached their top. Bibliometrics and scientometrics are the most-used terms, with, nowadays, the term bibliometrics being used about five times more than the term scientometrics. Any comprehensive bibliometric study should make use of a combination of related keywords to cover the whole field of study.
. 本文分析了文献计量学(广义)领域中最常用术语的演变。它比较了在web of science、Scopus和Dimensions这三个国际数据库中关于文献计量学、科学计量学、信息计量学、web(o)计量学、替代计量学和科学科学的出版物数量。我们发现,使用某个指标相关术语的文档的相对数量呈指数级增长。这说明了指标在科学界的重要性日益增加。虽然大多数术语单独显示出使用量的明显增加,但web(o)指标,或许还有信息指标,似乎已经达到了顶峰。文献计量学(Bibliometrics)和科学计量学(scientometrics)是最常用的术语,如今,文献计量学(Bibliometrics)的使用频率是科学计量学(scientometrics)的五倍。任何综合性文献计量学研究都应该利用相关关键词的组合来覆盖整个研究领域。