Effect of placental location on intra-uterine growth restriction and gestational hypertension

Samuel Archibong Efanga, Akintunde Olusijibomi Akintomide, Samson Omini Paulinus, Okon Asuquo Okon
{"title":"Effect of placental location on intra-uterine growth restriction and gestational hypertension","authors":"Samuel Archibong Efanga, Akintunde Olusijibomi Akintomide, Samson Omini Paulinus, Okon Asuquo Okon","doi":"10.4314/gjpas.v29i1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between uterine placental location and fetal growth restriction and gestational hypertension. \nMATERIALS AND METHOD: A prospective cross-sectional study done in the Department of Radiology of the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital (UCTH), Calabar, within a 4-month period. The study involved a total of 100 singleton pregnant women between 20 to 40 weeks of gestation who were aged 20 to 39 years. Analysis of the data was done using the statistical package for social science (SPSS) version 20 Inc. Chicago, IL. \nRESULTS: The frequency distribution of the placental locations were: anterior – 35%, postero-fundal – 36%, antero-fundal – 18% and posterior – 11%. The highest mean head circumference to abdominal circumference ratio (HC/AC) was seen in subjects with posterior placental location (1.03 ± 0.09), lowest mean estimated fetal weight (EFW) was seen in subjects with antero-fundal placental location (1.87 ± 0.92 kg) while the highest mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure were seen in subjects with postero-fundal placental location (113.89 ± 10.50 mmHg and 66.61 ± 7.07 mmHg) respectively. The lowest mean HC/AC was noted in subjects with anterior placental location (1.01 ± 0.08), the highest EFW was noted in subjects with postero-fundal placental location (2.26 ± 1.03 kg) while the lowest mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure were noted in subjects with posterior placental location (109.09 ± 5.39 mmHg and 61.82 ± 4.05 mmHg) respectively. There was no significant correlation between placental location and HC/AC, EFW, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.744, p = 0.567, p = 0.671, p = 0.936) respectively. \nCONCLUSION: Placental location in the uterus has no relationship with intrauterine growth restriction and the development of gestational hypertension in the second half of singleton pregnancies. \n ","PeriodicalId":12516,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gjpas.v29i1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between uterine placental location and fetal growth restriction and gestational hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A prospective cross-sectional study done in the Department of Radiology of the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital (UCTH), Calabar, within a 4-month period. The study involved a total of 100 singleton pregnant women between 20 to 40 weeks of gestation who were aged 20 to 39 years. Analysis of the data was done using the statistical package for social science (SPSS) version 20 Inc. Chicago, IL. RESULTS: The frequency distribution of the placental locations were: anterior – 35%, postero-fundal – 36%, antero-fundal – 18% and posterior – 11%. The highest mean head circumference to abdominal circumference ratio (HC/AC) was seen in subjects with posterior placental location (1.03 ± 0.09), lowest mean estimated fetal weight (EFW) was seen in subjects with antero-fundal placental location (1.87 ± 0.92 kg) while the highest mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure were seen in subjects with postero-fundal placental location (113.89 ± 10.50 mmHg and 66.61 ± 7.07 mmHg) respectively. The lowest mean HC/AC was noted in subjects with anterior placental location (1.01 ± 0.08), the highest EFW was noted in subjects with postero-fundal placental location (2.26 ± 1.03 kg) while the lowest mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure were noted in subjects with posterior placental location (109.09 ± 5.39 mmHg and 61.82 ± 4.05 mmHg) respectively. There was no significant correlation between placental location and HC/AC, EFW, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.744, p = 0.567, p = 0.671, p = 0.936) respectively. CONCLUSION: Placental location in the uterus has no relationship with intrauterine growth restriction and the development of gestational hypertension in the second half of singleton pregnancies.  
胎盘位置对子宫内生长受限和妊娠期高血压的影响
目的:探讨子宫胎盘位置与胎儿生长受限及妊娠期高血压的关系。材料和方法:在卡拉巴大学教学医院(UCTH)放射科进行的一项前瞻性横断面研究,为期4个月。该研究共涉及100名怀孕20至40周、年龄在20至39岁之间的单胎孕妇。数据的分析是使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)版本20 Inc.。结果:胎盘位置的频率分布为:前位- 35%,后基底位- 36%,前基底位- 18%,后基底位- 11%。平均头围/腹围比(HC/AC)以胎盘后位最高(1.03±0.09),平均估计胎儿体重(EFW)以胎盘前位最低(1.87±0.92 kg),平均收缩压和舒张压以胎盘后位最高(113.89±10.50 mmHg和66.61±7.07 mmHg)。平均HC/AC在胎盘前位组最低(1.01±0.08),EFW在胎盘后位组最高(2.26±1.03 kg),平均收缩压和舒张压在胎盘后位组最低(109.09±5.39 mmHg和61.82±4.05 mmHg)。胎盘位置与HC/AC、EFW、收缩压、舒张压均无显著相关性(p = 0.744, p = 0.567, p = 0.671, p = 0.936)。结论:单胎妊娠后半期胎盘在子宫内的位置与宫内生长受限及妊娠高血压的发生无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信