Causal Inference and Analysis of Surgery Cancellation Risks

Azra Alizadeh, Milad Eshkevari, M. Pashaei, M. Rezaee
{"title":"Causal Inference and Analysis of Surgery Cancellation Risks","authors":"Azra Alizadeh, Milad Eshkevari, M. Pashaei, M. Rezaee","doi":"10.22038/PSJ.2020.38946.1218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The provision of services in hospitals is the final level of the health care system chain, which usually provides the patients with advanced medical services, such as surgery. On the other hand, the cancellation of elective surgeries is one of the problems, which reduces the quality of service delivery and decreases hospital's efficiency and patients' satisfaction followed by increases in patients' costs. This study presented an approach based on a fuzzy inference system to better assess these hazards and eliminate the related risks and investigate effective factors in the cancellation of elective surgeries. Materials and Methods The present study conducted a case study in Shahid Arefian Hospital Urmia, Iran, during 2016-2017. Principal factors of surgery cancellations were collected from surgery documents in the hospital. These factors were divided into five classes, including paraclinical, clinical, systematic, surgeon, and patient. The hazards identified in these classes caused surgery cancellation. They were identified using the contribution of an expert team, including operating room supervisors, female and male surgery hospitalization supervisors, as well as two physicians. Results According to the results, the proposed approach was more appropriate for creating discrimination between surgery cancellation hazards, compared to the traditional risk priority number (RPN) method. Surgeon fatigue, high PPT and PT, and airway problems were the first to third important hazards with RPNs equal to 120, 105, and 96, respectively. On the other hand, according to obtained results, not having internal medicine specialist counseling, low thyroid stimulating hormone, and unavailability of beds at intensive care units were three important and priority potential hazards with FRPNs equal to 8, 8, and 6, respectively. Conclusion The proposed approach can better map hospital experts’ opinions to the fuzzy-based risk assessment system since it employs linguistic variables by hospitals’ experts, compared to conventional approaches. Moreover, it can help the hospital managements apply hospital resources to maximise their impacts on improving hospital efficiency.","PeriodicalId":16681,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and quality improvement","volume":"39 1","pages":"3-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and quality improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/PSJ.2020.38946.1218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The provision of services in hospitals is the final level of the health care system chain, which usually provides the patients with advanced medical services, such as surgery. On the other hand, the cancellation of elective surgeries is one of the problems, which reduces the quality of service delivery and decreases hospital's efficiency and patients' satisfaction followed by increases in patients' costs. This study presented an approach based on a fuzzy inference system to better assess these hazards and eliminate the related risks and investigate effective factors in the cancellation of elective surgeries. Materials and Methods The present study conducted a case study in Shahid Arefian Hospital Urmia, Iran, during 2016-2017. Principal factors of surgery cancellations were collected from surgery documents in the hospital. These factors were divided into five classes, including paraclinical, clinical, systematic, surgeon, and patient. The hazards identified in these classes caused surgery cancellation. They were identified using the contribution of an expert team, including operating room supervisors, female and male surgery hospitalization supervisors, as well as two physicians. Results According to the results, the proposed approach was more appropriate for creating discrimination between surgery cancellation hazards, compared to the traditional risk priority number (RPN) method. Surgeon fatigue, high PPT and PT, and airway problems were the first to third important hazards with RPNs equal to 120, 105, and 96, respectively. On the other hand, according to obtained results, not having internal medicine specialist counseling, low thyroid stimulating hormone, and unavailability of beds at intensive care units were three important and priority potential hazards with FRPNs equal to 8, 8, and 6, respectively. Conclusion The proposed approach can better map hospital experts’ opinions to the fuzzy-based risk assessment system since it employs linguistic variables by hospitals’ experts, compared to conventional approaches. Moreover, it can help the hospital managements apply hospital resources to maximise their impacts on improving hospital efficiency.
手术取消风险的原因推断与分析
医院提供的服务是医疗保健系统链条的最后一层,通常为患者提供先进的医疗服务,如手术。另一方面,选择性手术的取消是问题之一,它降低了服务质量,降低了医院的效率和患者的满意度,从而增加了患者的成本。本研究提出了一种基于模糊推理系统的方法,以更好地评估这些风险,消除相关风险,并探讨取消选择性手术的有效因素。材料与方法本研究于2016-2017年在伊朗乌尔米娅的Shahid Arefian医院进行病例研究。从医院的手术资料中收集手术取消的主要因素。这些因素分为5类,包括临床旁因素、临床因素、系统因素、外科因素和患者因素。在这些类别中确定的危害导致手术取消。他们是通过一个专家小组的贡献来确定的,该小组包括手术室主管、女性和男性外科住院主管以及两名医生。结果与传统的风险优先级数(RPN)方法相比,该方法更适合于对手术取消风险进行区分。外科医生疲劳、高PPT和高PT以及气道问题是第一至第三大危险,rpn分别为120、105和96。另一方面,根据获得的结果,没有内科专家咨询、促甲状腺激素水平低和重症监护病房床位不足是三个重要和优先的潜在危险,FRPNs分别为8、8和6。结论与传统方法相比,该方法采用了医院专家的语言变量,可以更好地将医院专家的意见映射到基于模糊的风险评估系统中。此外,它可以帮助医院管理层运用医院资源,以最大限度地提高医院效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信