Development and analysis of students’ use of online revision quizzes in GEES teaching

T. Stott
{"title":"Development and analysis of students’ use of online revision quizzes in GEES teaching","authors":"T. Stott","doi":"10.11120/PLAN.2012.00260066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Revision Quizzes (RQ) in the Blackboard (Bb) Virtual Learning Environment have been used to support student learning in Outdoor Education (OE) programmes at Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU) since 2003. Now several OE Bb modules are populated with revision quizzes which students use for formative assessment. There has been a gradual move towards including summative online tests (SOTs) as part of the range of final summative module assessment tasks (usually as a partial replacement for, or a supplement to, written examinations, thereby increasing the assessment diversity for students). In this project, ten-minute RQs were developed for 16 topics taught in a first year (Level 4) Introductory Earth Science and Climatology module at LJMU. These RQs were made available to students in Blackboard (Bb) from the start of the module. Data exported from Bb Grade Centre show an increase in RQ activity leading up to two SOTs 28 and 90 days into the module, with activity peaking the day before both SOTS. Eighty two percent of students enrolled on the module engaged with the RQs, each student attempting an average of 20 RQs (or 1.25 attempts per RQ). One student made 222 RQ attempts. Pearson correlation coefficients calculated for RQ attempts and mean score (RQ mean) vs. performance in selected module assessment tasks showed the RQ mean to be highly correlated with SOT scores, written exam paper scores and final module totals. The number of attempts at RQs is not as useful a predictor of students’ performance as the mean RQ score. However, when compared with lecture/field trip attendance, neither of the RQ measures were as good at predicting students’ performance. Students’ comments recorded during focus group discussions described how students used the RQs in their independent study in a variety of different ways which suited their own study habits, revealed their lack of previous experience of being tested in this way, showed how they were able to work at their own pace and demonstrated how they seemed to gain confidence from taking the RQs ‘again and again’. Using RQs in their independent study not only helped performance in the SOTs but helped performance in a written examination and across the module as a whole.","PeriodicalId":85255,"journal":{"name":"People & the planet","volume":"104 1","pages":"66 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"People & the planet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11120/PLAN.2012.00260066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Revision Quizzes (RQ) in the Blackboard (Bb) Virtual Learning Environment have been used to support student learning in Outdoor Education (OE) programmes at Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU) since 2003. Now several OE Bb modules are populated with revision quizzes which students use for formative assessment. There has been a gradual move towards including summative online tests (SOTs) as part of the range of final summative module assessment tasks (usually as a partial replacement for, or a supplement to, written examinations, thereby increasing the assessment diversity for students). In this project, ten-minute RQs were developed for 16 topics taught in a first year (Level 4) Introductory Earth Science and Climatology module at LJMU. These RQs were made available to students in Blackboard (Bb) from the start of the module. Data exported from Bb Grade Centre show an increase in RQ activity leading up to two SOTs 28 and 90 days into the module, with activity peaking the day before both SOTS. Eighty two percent of students enrolled on the module engaged with the RQs, each student attempting an average of 20 RQs (or 1.25 attempts per RQ). One student made 222 RQ attempts. Pearson correlation coefficients calculated for RQ attempts and mean score (RQ mean) vs. performance in selected module assessment tasks showed the RQ mean to be highly correlated with SOT scores, written exam paper scores and final module totals. The number of attempts at RQs is not as useful a predictor of students’ performance as the mean RQ score. However, when compared with lecture/field trip attendance, neither of the RQ measures were as good at predicting students’ performance. Students’ comments recorded during focus group discussions described how students used the RQs in their independent study in a variety of different ways which suited their own study habits, revealed their lack of previous experience of being tested in this way, showed how they were able to work at their own pace and demonstrated how they seemed to gain confidence from taking the RQs ‘again and again’. Using RQs in their independent study not only helped performance in the SOTs but helped performance in a written examination and across the module as a whole.
初中英语教学中学生在线复习测验的开发与分析
自2003年以来,利物浦约翰摩尔斯大学(LJMU)在黑板(Bb)虚拟学习环境中使用复习测验(RQ)来支持学生在户外教育(OE)项目中的学习。现在,几个OE Bb模块都加入了学生用来进行形成性评估的复习测验。已逐步将总结性在线考试(SOTs)作为总结性模块最终评估任务的一部分(通常作为笔试的部分替代或补充,从而增加了对学生的评估多样性)。在这个项目中,我们为LJMU第一年(四级)地球科学与气候学导论模块的16个主题设计了10分钟问答。这些rq从模块开始就在Blackboard (Bb)中提供给学生。从Bb级中心导出的数据显示,进入模块后的第28天和第90天,RQ活动增加,导致两次SOTs,活动在两次SOTs的前一天达到峰值。该模块中82%的学生参与了RQ测试,每个学生平均尝试20个RQ(或每个RQ 1.25次)。一名学生做了222次RQ测试。RQ尝试次数和平均分数(RQ平均值)与选定模块评估任务中的表现计算的Pearson相关系数显示,RQ平均值与SOT分数,笔试分数和最终模块总数高度相关。RQ的尝试次数并不能像RQ平均分那样有效地预测学生的表现。然而,当与讲座/实地考察出勤率相比时,两种RQ方法都不能很好地预测学生的表现。在焦点小组讨论中记录的学生评论描述了学生如何在独立学习中以各种不同的方式使用rq,这些方式适合他们自己的学习习惯,揭示了他们之前缺乏以这种方式进行测试的经验,展示了他们如何能够按照自己的节奏工作,并展示了他们如何从“一次又一次”的rq中获得信心。在他们的独立学习中使用rq不仅有助于他们在sot中的表现,还有助于他们在笔试和整个模块中的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书