The index of harm: A measure for comparing occupational risk across industries

Kenneth A. Solomon, Kirsten A. Alesch
{"title":"The index of harm: A measure for comparing occupational risk across industries","authors":"Kenneth A. Solomon,&nbsp;Kirsten A. Alesch","doi":"10.1016/0376-6349(89)90003-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents an index of harm methodology that compares occupational risk among workers exposed to radiological and nonradiological harms. It extends the work of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) by considering American rather than European and Japanese industry groups, by treating the relative importance of various occupational harms as a parameter rather than an arbitrary constant, and by identifying several ways in which both the methodology and the database could be improved. In the analysis, we examine the risk affects of six occupational harms — three nonradiological (death, accidental injury, and disease or illness) and three radiological (somatic effects, genetic effects, and somatic effects to the fetuses or embryos of pregnant women). We performed our analysis under five different assumptions about the relative importance of averting of the six harms in question. The results of this analysis show that radiological workers exposed to the current industry average of 0.35 rem/year are among the safest of all industry groupings, and the riskiest industries appear to be mining; agriculture, fishing, and farming; construction; transportation; and manufacturing, roughly in that order.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 19-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(89)90003-5","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0376634989900035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper presents an index of harm methodology that compares occupational risk among workers exposed to radiological and nonradiological harms. It extends the work of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) by considering American rather than European and Japanese industry groups, by treating the relative importance of various occupational harms as a parameter rather than an arbitrary constant, and by identifying several ways in which both the methodology and the database could be improved. In the analysis, we examine the risk affects of six occupational harms — three nonradiological (death, accidental injury, and disease or illness) and three radiological (somatic effects, genetic effects, and somatic effects to the fetuses or embryos of pregnant women). We performed our analysis under five different assumptions about the relative importance of averting of the six harms in question. The results of this analysis show that radiological workers exposed to the current industry average of 0.35 rem/year are among the safest of all industry groupings, and the riskiest industries appear to be mining; agriculture, fishing, and farming; construction; transportation; and manufacturing, roughly in that order.

危害指数:一种比较各行业职业风险的指标
本文提出了一种危害指数方法,比较暴露于放射性和非放射性危害的工人的职业风险。它扩展了国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)的工作,考虑了美国而不是欧洲和日本的工业集团,将各种职业危害的相对重要性作为一个参数而不是一个任意常数,并确定了可以改进方法和数据库的几种方法。在分析中,我们检查了六种职业危害的风险影响——三种非放射性(死亡、意外伤害和疾病或疾病)和三种放射性(对胎儿或孕妇胚胎的躯体影响、遗传影响和躯体影响)。我们在五种不同的假设下进行了我们的分析,假设避免六种危害的相对重要性。分析结果表明,目前行业平均每年0.35雷姆的辐射量是所有行业中最安全的,而最危险的行业似乎是采矿业;农业、渔业和农业;建设;交通运输;制造业,大致是这个顺序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信