Kenneth King and Meera Venkatachalam (eds), India’s Development Diplomacy and Soft Power in Africa. Woodbridge and Rochester NY: James Currey (pb £25/US$36.95 – 978 1 84701 274 6). 2021, v + 219 pp.

Vineet Thakur
{"title":"Kenneth King and Meera Venkatachalam (eds), India’s Development Diplomacy and Soft Power in Africa. Woodbridge and Rochester NY: James Currey (pb £25/US$36.95 – 978 1 84701 274 6). 2021, v + 219 pp.","authors":"Vineet Thakur","doi":"10.1017/S0001972023000293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"baffle students of South African radical politics. Lodge attempts to resolve – or at least provide the best-known information on – several historical controversies, such as the Comintern’s actual impact on the Party and Mandela’s membership. He offers a balanced and complex analysis of the Party’s oscillation between class-based struggle (with a focus on white workers) and its engagement in the national liberation movement (with an emphasis on cooperation with non-white nationalist organizations), also demonstrating how racialism sometimes played a role in the early Party. He delicately dissects the Party’s relations and influence within the ANC, brilliantly indicating that, despite the communist overrepresentation within the ANC’s upper echelons, South African communists should not be treated as a unified group, as ‘their personal loyalties and their political intentions were probably more complicated’ (p. 429). The SACP–ANC intimate alliance is detailed with the finest nuance. Yet I believe that here lies the main lacuna in this otherwise extremely impressive project. The alliance is exceptional, not least because it has endured for seven decades and virtually turned the SACP into an auxiliary force within the ANC. This alliance is well described by Lodge, but its exceptionality is not explained sufficiently. What brought the SACP to decide to virtually minimize its separate identity for so long – indeed, until the present day? Why is it so tightly and piously linked to the ANC, despite the latter’s changing forms and South Africa’s shifting realities? Were there, after 1950, other alternative routes the Party might have taken? It reads almost as if this tight ANC–SACP alliance was inevitable. Lodge explains well how, by the 1950s, the communists came to prefer anti-colonial nationalism over class struggle, but this ideological decision – as well as the camaraderie during the anti-apartheid struggle in exile – does not fully explain why relations with the ANC became so exceptional and so long-lasting, even long into the post-apartheid era. Nevertheless, Lodge has produced a historical masterpiece that presents the ultimate authoritative word on the history of communism in South Africa. The bookshelves of anyone interested in South African history or the global history of communism would not be complete without this work.","PeriodicalId":80373,"journal":{"name":"Africa : notiziario dell'Associazione fra le imprese italiane in Africa","volume":"97 1","pages":"311 - 313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa : notiziario dell'Associazione fra le imprese italiane in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001972023000293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

baffle students of South African radical politics. Lodge attempts to resolve – or at least provide the best-known information on – several historical controversies, such as the Comintern’s actual impact on the Party and Mandela’s membership. He offers a balanced and complex analysis of the Party’s oscillation between class-based struggle (with a focus on white workers) and its engagement in the national liberation movement (with an emphasis on cooperation with non-white nationalist organizations), also demonstrating how racialism sometimes played a role in the early Party. He delicately dissects the Party’s relations and influence within the ANC, brilliantly indicating that, despite the communist overrepresentation within the ANC’s upper echelons, South African communists should not be treated as a unified group, as ‘their personal loyalties and their political intentions were probably more complicated’ (p. 429). The SACP–ANC intimate alliance is detailed with the finest nuance. Yet I believe that here lies the main lacuna in this otherwise extremely impressive project. The alliance is exceptional, not least because it has endured for seven decades and virtually turned the SACP into an auxiliary force within the ANC. This alliance is well described by Lodge, but its exceptionality is not explained sufficiently. What brought the SACP to decide to virtually minimize its separate identity for so long – indeed, until the present day? Why is it so tightly and piously linked to the ANC, despite the latter’s changing forms and South Africa’s shifting realities? Were there, after 1950, other alternative routes the Party might have taken? It reads almost as if this tight ANC–SACP alliance was inevitable. Lodge explains well how, by the 1950s, the communists came to prefer anti-colonial nationalism over class struggle, but this ideological decision – as well as the camaraderie during the anti-apartheid struggle in exile – does not fully explain why relations with the ANC became so exceptional and so long-lasting, even long into the post-apartheid era. Nevertheless, Lodge has produced a historical masterpiece that presents the ultimate authoritative word on the history of communism in South Africa. The bookshelves of anyone interested in South African history or the global history of communism would not be complete without this work.
Kenneth King和Meera Venkatachalam主编,《印度在非洲的发展外交和软实力》。纽约伍德布里奇和罗切斯特:詹姆斯·柯里(25英镑/ 36.95美元- 978 1 84701 274),2021,v + 219页。
让研究南非激进政治的学生感到困惑。洛奇试图解决——或者至少提供最著名的信息——几个历史争议,比如共产国际对党的实际影响和曼德拉的成员身份。他对党在阶级斗争(关注白人工人)和参与民族解放运动(强调与非白人民族主义组织的合作)之间的摇摆进行了平衡而复杂的分析,也展示了种族主义有时如何在早期的党中发挥作用。他细致地剖析了该党在非国大内部的关系和影响,出色地指出,尽管共产党在非国大高层中占多数,但南非共产党人不应被视为一个统一的团体,因为“他们的个人忠诚和政治意图可能更为复杂”(第429页)。SACP-ANC的亲密联盟有着最细微的细节。然而,我认为这是这个令人印象深刻的项目的主要缺陷。这个联盟是特殊的,尤其是因为它已经持续了70年,实际上把南非共产党变成了非国大的辅助力量。洛奇很好地描述了这个联盟,但它的特殊性没有得到充分的解释。是什么让SACP决定在这么长时间内——事实上,直到今天——实际上最小化其独立身份?尽管非国大的形式在不断变化,南非的现实也在不断变化,为什么它与非国大的关系如此紧密而虔诚?一九五〇年以后,党还有没有别的路线可以走呢?从上面看来,ANC-SACP的紧密联盟似乎是不可避免的。洛奇很好地解释了,到20世纪50年代,共产党人如何开始倾向于反殖民主义的民族主义,而不是阶级斗争,但这一意识形态的决定——以及流亡期间反种族隔离斗争中的同志情谊——并不能完全解释为什么与非国大的关系变得如此特殊和持久,甚至一直延续到后种族隔离时代。尽管如此,洛奇还是写出了一部历史杰作,对南非共产主义的历史给出了最权威的评价。任何对南非历史或全球共产主义历史感兴趣的人,如果没有这本书,他们的书架上都不会有完整的书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信