Adequacy Rate of Magnesium Citrate Bowel Preparation in a Large Retrospective Cohort.

M. Alsamman, S. Leung, Abdelmoniem Moustafa, M. Abeid, G. Baird, Samir A. Shah
{"title":"Adequacy Rate of Magnesium Citrate Bowel Preparation in a Large Retrospective Cohort.","authors":"M. Alsamman, S. Leung, Abdelmoniem Moustafa, M. Abeid, G. Baird, Samir A. Shah","doi":"10.14309/01.ajg.0000590312.35628.6e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nMagnesium Citrate (MC) is not FDA approved as a colonoscopy preparation. Advantages include low cost, small volume and accessibility without prescription. We retrospectively evaluated bowel preparations used in a private gastroenterology practice. The sample size is the largest for any similar studies (n =19,173).\n\n\nMETHODS\nElectronic Medical Records were queried for colonoscopies between 2010-2016. Bowel preps, indications (screening vs. other) and preparation adequacy were all recorded. Adequacy rates were calculated and compared using generalized linear modeling. Data were analyzed using SAS.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe most common prep used was MC 2 bottles; screening (n=6,064, with 98.94% adequacy) and non-screening (n=3,251, with 99.29% adequacy), followed by MC 3 bottles; screening (n=2,757 with 90.35% adequacy), and non-screening (n=1,925 with 92.92% adequacy).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nMC bowel preparation is adequate, well tolerated, and inexpensive. In a large retrospective analysis, it compares favorably to other preparations.","PeriodicalId":21256,"journal":{"name":"Rhode Island medical journal","volume":"62 1","pages":"46-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhode Island medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0000590312.35628.6e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Magnesium Citrate (MC) is not FDA approved as a colonoscopy preparation. Advantages include low cost, small volume and accessibility without prescription. We retrospectively evaluated bowel preparations used in a private gastroenterology practice. The sample size is the largest for any similar studies (n =19,173). METHODS Electronic Medical Records were queried for colonoscopies between 2010-2016. Bowel preps, indications (screening vs. other) and preparation adequacy were all recorded. Adequacy rates were calculated and compared using generalized linear modeling. Data were analyzed using SAS. RESULTS The most common prep used was MC 2 bottles; screening (n=6,064, with 98.94% adequacy) and non-screening (n=3,251, with 99.29% adequacy), followed by MC 3 bottles; screening (n=2,757 with 90.35% adequacy), and non-screening (n=1,925 with 92.92% adequacy). CONCLUSION MC bowel preparation is adequate, well tolerated, and inexpensive. In a large retrospective analysis, it compares favorably to other preparations.
大型回顾性队列中柠檬酸镁肠道准备的充分率。
柠檬酸镁(MC)未被FDA批准作为结肠镜检查制剂。优点是成本低,体积小,无需处方即可获得。我们回顾性地评估了在私人胃肠病学实践中使用的肠道制剂。本研究样本量是同类研究中最大的(n = 19173)。方法查询2010-2016年结肠镜检查的电子病历。记录了肠道准备、适应症(筛查与其他)和准备的充分性。利用广义线性模型计算和比较充分率。数据采用SAS分析。结果使用最多的制剂为mc2瓶;筛选(n= 6064,充分性98.94%)和未筛选(n= 3251,充分性99.29%),其次是mc3瓶;筛查组(n= 2757,充分性为90.35%)和非筛查组(n= 1925,充分性为92.92%)。结论mc肠道准备是充分的、耐受性良好的、廉价的。在一项大型回顾性分析中,它优于其他制剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信