G. Mishra, N. Goel, Sudeep Gupta, S. Laskar, Apoorva V. Tiloda, Ankita A. Bhagwat, V. Kulkarni, H. Shaikh, C. Pramesh, S. Tandon, Sandeep S. Sawakare, M. Sengar, S. Biswas, S. Epari, O. Shetty, S. Desai, R. Badwe
{"title":"Efficacy of screening cancer patients at hospital entrance for COVID-19 with a questionnaire and thermal scanning: An audit","authors":"G. Mishra, N. Goel, Sudeep Gupta, S. Laskar, Apoorva V. Tiloda, Ankita A. Bhagwat, V. Kulkarni, H. Shaikh, C. Pramesh, S. Tandon, Sandeep S. Sawakare, M. Sengar, S. Biswas, S. Epari, O. Shetty, S. Desai, R. Badwe","doi":"10.25259/ijms_193_2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nAlthough commonly practiced, the accuracy, effectiveness, and safety of screening patients for COVID-19 at hospital entrances is not well documented.\n\n\n\nWe performed a retrospective analysis of single institution data involving screening patients for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection at hospital entrances by trained health personnel, with thermal scanning and administration of a standard questionnaire eliciting risk factors and symptoms of COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 positivity among patients screened positive and negative and among personnel involved in screening were estimated.\n\n\n\nBetween May 22, 2020, and July 4, 2020, a total of 20152 patients involving 54955 hospital visits were screened at hospital entrances of whom 668 (3.31%, 95% CI 3.07–3.57) were screened positive for suspected COVID-19 and 19484 (96.69%, 95% CI 96.44–96.93) were screened negative. Among patients screened positive, of the 638 patients with available records, 109 (17.08%, 95% CI 14.24–20.23) were confirmed to be SARS-CoV-2 positive by polymerase chain reaction test, 288 (45.14%, 95% CI 41.23–49.10) were negative, 71 (11.13%, 95% CI 8.79–13.83) were not tested after secondary assessment, and 170 (26.65%, 95% CI 23.25–30.26) patients declined the test. Among screen negative patients, 162 (0.83%, 95% CI 0.71–0.97) were SARS-CoV-2 positive. Of the 104 personnel involved in screening, 03 (2.88%, 95% CI 0.60–8.20) were confirmed to be SARS-CoV-2 positive during study period.\n\n\n\nScreening patients with a combination of thermal scanning and a standard questionnaire for COVID-19 has a high positive predictive value for detecting this infection with low risk of SARS-COV-2 transmission to the involved health personnel.\n","PeriodicalId":13277,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of medical sciences","volume":"360 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijms_193_2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although commonly practiced, the accuracy, effectiveness, and safety of screening patients for COVID-19 at hospital entrances is not well documented.
We performed a retrospective analysis of single institution data involving screening patients for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection at hospital entrances by trained health personnel, with thermal scanning and administration of a standard questionnaire eliciting risk factors and symptoms of COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 positivity among patients screened positive and negative and among personnel involved in screening were estimated.
Between May 22, 2020, and July 4, 2020, a total of 20152 patients involving 54955 hospital visits were screened at hospital entrances of whom 668 (3.31%, 95% CI 3.07–3.57) were screened positive for suspected COVID-19 and 19484 (96.69%, 95% CI 96.44–96.93) were screened negative. Among patients screened positive, of the 638 patients with available records, 109 (17.08%, 95% CI 14.24–20.23) were confirmed to be SARS-CoV-2 positive by polymerase chain reaction test, 288 (45.14%, 95% CI 41.23–49.10) were negative, 71 (11.13%, 95% CI 8.79–13.83) were not tested after secondary assessment, and 170 (26.65%, 95% CI 23.25–30.26) patients declined the test. Among screen negative patients, 162 (0.83%, 95% CI 0.71–0.97) were SARS-CoV-2 positive. Of the 104 personnel involved in screening, 03 (2.88%, 95% CI 0.60–8.20) were confirmed to be SARS-CoV-2 positive during study period.
Screening patients with a combination of thermal scanning and a standard questionnaire for COVID-19 has a high positive predictive value for detecting this infection with low risk of SARS-COV-2 transmission to the involved health personnel.
尽管这种做法很普遍,但在医院入口处对患者进行COVID-19筛查的准确性、有效性和安全性并没有得到很好的记录。我们对单个机构的数据进行了回顾性分析,这些数据涉及由训练有素的卫生人员在医院入口处筛查严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)感染患者,并使用热扫描和标准问卷调查,以了解COVID-19的危险因素和症状。估计筛查阳性和阴性患者以及参与筛查人员的SARS-CoV-2阳性情况。2020年5月22日至7月4日期间,在医院入口处共筛查了20152例患者,涉及54955次就诊,其中668例(3.31%,95% CI 3.07-3.57)为疑似COVID-19阳性,19484例(96.69%,95% CI 96.44-96.93)为阴性。在筛查阳性的638例有记录的患者中,聚合酶链反应试验确诊SARS-CoV-2阳性109例(17.08%,95% CI 14.24 ~ 20.23),阴性288例(45.14%,95% CI 41.23 ~ 49.10),二次评估后未检测71例(11.13%,95% CI 8.79 ~ 13.83),拒绝检测170例(26.65%,95% CI 23.25 ~ 30.26)。在筛查阴性患者中,162例(0.83%,95% CI 0.71-0.97)为SARS-CoV-2阳性。在参与筛查的104名人员中,有03人(2.88%,95% CI 0.60-8.20)在研究期间被确认为SARS-CoV-2阳性。结合热扫描和标准问卷筛查患者COVID-19,对相关卫生人员发现这种低风险的SARS-COV-2感染具有较高的阳性预测价值。