THE ANALYSIS OF CONTEXTS OF COPING WITH STRESS, EXPERIENCED BY SOCIAL WELFARE PROFESSIONALS: EXPERIENCE OF LITHUANIA AND SCANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES

IF 0.4 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
Daiva Alifanovienė, Odeta Šapelytė, Darius Gerulaitis
{"title":"THE ANALYSIS OF CONTEXTS OF COPING WITH STRESS, EXPERIENCED BY SOCIAL WELFARE PROFESSIONALS: EXPERIENCE OF LITHUANIA AND SCANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES","authors":"Daiva Alifanovienė, Odeta Šapelytė, Darius Gerulaitis","doi":"10.21277/SW.V2I7.315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with stress and coping with the stress experienced by social welfare professionals in different social and cultural context. The comparison of inter-professional stressogenity shows that the greatest stress is experienced by the representatives of social sphere professions. The main aim of the article is to disclose the contexts of possibilities for coping with stress experienced by social welfare professionals in Lithuania and Scandinavian countries. Specialists’ (N=12) experience was analysed employing the qualitative data collection method (semi-structured written interview), using  open-ended questions according to assessment areas foreseen by the researchers. Reconstructing the context of coping with stress experienced by specialists of social welfare professions of these countries, certain differences showed up: Lithuanian social welfare professionals use the most affordable ways for stress coping in the intrapersonal (physical and emotional) area. Due to a more favourable socio-economic situation in the country, Scandinavian informants have a wider range of stress management possibilities in terms of affordability, content and choice.","PeriodicalId":41093,"journal":{"name":"Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21277/SW.V2I7.315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article deals with stress and coping with the stress experienced by social welfare professionals in different social and cultural context. The comparison of inter-professional stressogenity shows that the greatest stress is experienced by the representatives of social sphere professions. The main aim of the article is to disclose the contexts of possibilities for coping with stress experienced by social welfare professionals in Lithuania and Scandinavian countries. Specialists’ (N=12) experience was analysed employing the qualitative data collection method (semi-structured written interview), using  open-ended questions according to assessment areas foreseen by the researchers. Reconstructing the context of coping with stress experienced by specialists of social welfare professions of these countries, certain differences showed up: Lithuanian social welfare professionals use the most affordable ways for stress coping in the intrapersonal (physical and emotional) area. Due to a more favourable socio-economic situation in the country, Scandinavian informants have a wider range of stress management possibilities in terms of affordability, content and choice.
社会福利专业人员应对压力的情境分析:立陶宛和斯堪的纳维亚国家的经验
本文探讨了不同社会文化背景下社会福利工作者所经历的压力以及应对压力的方法。跨专业压力源性的比较表明,社会领域专业代表承受的压力最大。本文的主要目的是揭示立陶宛和斯堪的纳维亚国家社会福利专业人员应对压力的可能性背景。采用定性数据收集方法(半结构化书面访谈)对专家(N=12)的经验进行分析,根据研究人员预见的评估领域使用开放式问题。重建这些国家社会福利专业人员应对压力的背景,发现了一定的差异:立陶宛社会福利专业人员在个人(身体和情感)领域使用最经济实惠的方式应对压力。由于该国的社会经济状况较好,斯堪的纳维亚的举报人在负担能力、内容和选择方面有更广泛的压力管理可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信